Mitchell V Khan: And the winner is?

101boxing · Post by **101boxing** » 16 Jul 2007, 10:11

who do you fancy?

Taking into consideration Khans weight advantage and generally being much bigger, who would you tip for this one should it happen?

Technically i think Mitchell is a better fighter, but the size and power of Khan could tip it his way.

Mitchell for me.

Dirk Kelly · Post by **Dirk Kelly** » 16 Jul 2007, 10:15

Tough one this, think maybe too close to call but will be a slug fest while it lasted.

Phenomenal-Nutrition · Post by **Phenomenal-Nutrition** » 16 Jul 2007, 10:34

Mitchells defense is Gatti-esque, close your eyes throw your hand in front of you and your bound to find mitchell. His punch is probably a bit better than Limmond BUT his timing is nowhere near as good so he won't land as flush as Limmond. Khan mid round stoppage

dr_devious · Post by **dr_devious** » 17 Jul 2007, 08:13

Pick em, both have decent power and speed and crap defences. Whoever lands well first probably

Albert · Post by **Albert** » 17 Jul 2007, 17:36

Has Mitchell been decked by a non puncher?

rhino222 · Post by **rhino222** » 17 Jul 2007, 17:41

but has mitchell fought anyone who is/was 29-1 or whatever limmond was going into the fight.

lets not take anything away from willie, he is a good technician with cute boxing skills, he is a test for anyone at any reasonable level.

Albert · Post by **Albert** » 17 Jul 2007, 17:56

rhino222 wrote:but has mitchell fought anyone who is/was 29-1 or whatever limmond was going into the fight.

lets not take anything away from willie, he is a good technician with cute boxing skills, he is a test for anyone at any reasonable level.

But to get decked by him and badl shaken where no one would have grumbled if Khan had got stopped?