well then, i agree there. it will be hard work for eitherMattyp151 wrote:Not to change subject, but I had Pavlik in that one as well, so I don't think your opinion is crazy. However, to say what Magri said that Hatton is going to take him out is just as crazy as saying easy work for Floyd at this point. It's going to be very difficult for both guys, and just because the fight starts in one direction doesn't mean it can't go in another around round 6.Autobarn wrote:Floyd got stung with a straight left or two.Mattyp151 wrote: Mitchell didn;t touch Floyd at all in that fight, you're on crack. That was 6 rounds of Sharmba being out of his league and getting picked apart. Corley's shot was no better or worse than Judah's double jab striaght left that backed Floyd up, notice what happened immediately after each...Nothing, Floyd snuffed the follow up with his defense.
Yes, Hatton has a chance, but those clinches that Castillo got into won't be there with Floyd. He doesn't try to clinch much, it's mostly pucnhing while going backwards from corner to corner, and moving when you touch the ropes.
I notice you didn't mention how Floyd buckled Oscar's knees in the 5th with his back against the ropes though...
Sure, Floyd can hurt fighters - he hits correclty and solidly enough.
I'm so not getting sucked into this reactinary Mayweather can't be beat shite. I was practically ridiculed for having the bare faced audacity for saying that Pavlik could beat Miranda.
All the top p4p guys can get beaten, Mosley, Forrest, Jones Jr, Hopkins, Tszyu etc etc
2007, vintage year for boxing?
Re: 2007, vintage year for boxing?
Few moreShirow wrote:For entertainment, spectacle & anticipation 2007 has been the best i can remember.
So far this year we have had
Hatton v Castillo
Pavlik v Taylor
Cotto v Judah
Katsidis v Earl
Marquez v Barrera
Marquez v Vazquez
De La Hoya v Mayweather
Donaire v Darchinyan
Linares v Larios
Williams v Margarito
Johannsen v Burns
Sprott v Harrison
Limond v Khan
And we've got these to look forward to
Pavlik v Taylor
Pacquiao v Barrera II
Calzaghe v Kessler
Marquez v Vazquez II
Hatton v Mayweather
Khan v Earl (maybe not i've just read)
Mosley v Cotto
Have i missed any out?
Ponce De Leon vs Bautista
Cazares vs Calderon
Witter vs Harris
Marquez vs Barrios
Maskaev vs Peter
Ibragimov vs Chagaev (unification)
Diaz vs Diaz (unification)
Klitschko returning against McCline
Unbelievable year for boxing!
Re: 2007, vintage year for boxing?
Take off the first 3rd of the year, we're looking at THEE best year in Boxing in quite some time.lvlarc wrote:Few moreShirow wrote:For entertainment, spectacle & anticipation 2007 has been the best i can remember.
So far this year we have had
Hatton v Castillo
Pavlik v Taylor
Cotto v Judah
Katsidis v Earl
Marquez v Barrera
Marquez v Vazquez
De La Hoya v Mayweather
Donaire v Darchinyan
Linares v Larios
Williams v Margarito
Johannsen v Burns
Sprott v Harrison
Limond v Khan
And we've got these to look forward to
Pavlik v Taylor
Pacquiao v Barrera II
Calzaghe v Kessler
Marquez v Vazquez II
Hatton v Mayweather
Khan v Earl (maybe not i've just read)
Mosley v Cotto
Have i missed any out?
Ponce De Leon vs Bautista
Cazares vs Calderon
Witter vs Harris
Marquez vs Barrios
Maskaev vs Peter
Ibragimov vs Chagaev (unification)
Diaz vs Diaz (unification)
Klitschko returning against McCline
Unbelievable year for boxing!
Ah yeah, a few of those I forgot...either way, Boxing has definitely had an upswing in 07.lvlarc wrote:One of the best no doubt, 1st 3rd of the year was quality also with..
Peter vs Toney II
Dawson vs Adamek
Mosley vs Collazo
Marquez vs Vazquez
Green vs Miranda
Mormeck vs Bell II
Mundine vs Soliman (Superfight in Oz)
Marquez vs Barrera
Valuev losing to Chagaev
Arce vs Mijares
Diaz vs Freitas