Secondsout once again blowing off their chosen one!

oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Post by oliverfennell »

boxingchatter wrote:Talking of race-hate in boxing? Was anyone there at O2 to hear Amir get a load of abuse from Mitchell supporters? Did it actually happen?

Couldn't hear it on TV but Star wrote it was pretty bad.
Didn't hear any. There was some friendly banter between Khan's Asian fans and a band of Limond support in an adjacent block of seats, but nothing sinister.
jonp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2081
Joined: 29 Mar 2007, 12:44

Post by jonp »

I was sitting inbetween those fans directly and it was quite funny nothing nasty you could see Khans fans laughing as the Scots got into it.
jonp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2081
Joined: 29 Mar 2007, 12:44

Post by jonp »

boxingchatter wrote:
jonp wrote:
boxingchat wrote:
I sort of concede that one but nevertheless the 'Bacon Dodger' comment was still uncalled for.Jewish people consider their religion and race to be one and the same so your comments may offend.

Who was the British and Jewish promoter out of interest?
Dont realy care too much but saying its his religion not his race is a weak arguement.
Call some slant eyes (features)Cotton picker (Job)Frog (animal)Bog hopper (not sure)Raghead (clothing)
None of these are mentioning race but try using and them and ul be banned pretty quick,so why would bacon dodger be any differnt?
It is not a weak argument, just a sophisticated one.

You can dislike/disagree with a belief/religion a person has without hating or disliking the person (and I don‘t know Greenberg, he may be a nice kid, but he‘s a crap fighter). Likewise not having any respect for an institution does not automatically follow I don’t have respect for any particular individual who has that belief or follows that religion.

Again, I wasn’t being racist towards Greenberg. Merely I think religion - all of them, even the cool ones like Jason and the Argonaughts - are stupid. If Evander Holyfield etc can spout pro-religious crap in the ring, don’t dump on me for making on dumb comment on a forum.

If anything, Greenberg is the racist as evidenced here by his very own cheerleader Clive Bernath http://www.secondsout.com/UK/news.cfm?ccs=228&cs=20083
So you think the above names i wrote are ok to use in everyday language and will not offend then?
They are the same as yours not mentioning race but aimed at a certain section of people.If you agree that the names iv put are ok to use then bacond dodger is no different.
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Post by m1kee50 »

People were cu nting off my people before the average Englishman had ever seen a black bloke - but admittedly after the Jews....

I think you can say anything you like in jest. I certainly dont think pork-dodger is wrong, anymore for a Jew than a Lesbian!
Albert
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 419
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 14:43

Post by Albert »

What has all this got to do with boxing?

Yeah criticise Greenburg until the cows come home but all the rest of it really has no relevance to this forum.
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Post by m1kee50 »

Albert wrote:What has all this got to do with boxing?

Yeah criticise Greenburg until the cows come home but all the rest of it really has no relevance to this forum.

true. As steve said in another thread - Belshaw + Greenberg = quality boxer
boxingchat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1934
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 05:26

Post by boxingchat »

Albert wrote:What has all this got to do with boxing?

Yeah criticise Greenburg until the cows come home but all the rest of it really has no relevance to this forum.

Cows? Are they sacred Cows?
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45233
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

~ MIKEE ~ wrote:People were cu nting off my people before the average Englishman had ever seen a black bloke - but admittedly after the Jews....

I think you can say anything you like in jest. I certainly dont think pork-dodger is wrong, anymore for a Jew than a Lesbian!
You must be a mick then....
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Post by m1kee50 »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
~ MIKEE ~ wrote:People were cu nting off my people before the average Englishman had ever seen a black bloke - but admittedly after the Jews....

I think you can say anything you like in jest. I certainly dont think pork-dodger is wrong, anymore for a Jew than a Lesbian!
You must be a mick then....
Im not fussed, its all in the past and we are calling it a draw lol, but it gets my goat when people moan about racism

- the Jews because they are dishing a bit out themselves now, but not against the mighty Germans, oh no, a poor bunch of arabs who got evicted in '48

- and the blacks because in percentage terms we got fucked worse than they did im convinced of it.

But by and large (this post being the exception) I and most other Irish people dont make a song and dance over it..... we even came and built your roads for you!

felt good to get that off my chest lol
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45233
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

You didn't build roads for me mate, my dad was one of the thousands of paddies who came over to work on building sites in the mid fifties. :TU:
Southpaw Stylist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1484
Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 04:50

Post by Southpaw Stylist »

Someone enlighten me, what's a "mick"?
lowersmiths
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by lowersmiths »

DavidPayne wrote:Is Jim Royale what they call Quarterpounders in your neck of the woods?
i enjoyed it mr keepmoat, but i seem to be in the minority
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Post by DavidPayne »

Thanks Codfather.

It takes a more discerning mind to enjoy these things.
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Post by m1kee50 »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:You didn't build roads for me mate, my dad was one of the thousands of paddies who came over to work on building sites in the mid fifties. :TU:
I dont mean no offence, it was a general 'you'
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Post by m1kee50 »

Southpaw Stylist wrote:Someone enlighten me, what's a "mick"?
Mildly offensive term for Irishman, usually the Catholic Variety.... the French call the English Rosbifs, that sort of level of name-calling
Post Reply