British Top 30 P4P August 2007

stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27497
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

Loftgroov wrote:Gavin Rees is above Carl Froch on what basis?
Gavin Rees has beaten a top #7 fighter in his devision... Froch hasn't.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Post by Horse »

stujones wrote:
Loftgroov wrote:Gavin Rees is above Carl Froch on what basis?
Gavin Rees has beaten a top #7 fighter in his devision... Froch hasn't.
That is pretty much it.
Loftgroov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3712
Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 10:48

Post by Loftgroov »

Hmmm... How come sometimes rankings are adjudged to be meaningless (contrived and engineered by governing bodies) and at other times used to underpin how good someone is for the sake of argument?

Froch is more of a talent than Rees. I suppose it depends what the criteria are for these rankings.
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Post by m1kee50 »

Horse wrote:
stujones wrote:
Loftgroov wrote:Gavin Rees is above Carl Froch on what basis?
Gavin Rees has beaten a top #7 fighter in his devision... Froch hasn't.
That is pretty much it.
Mbaye is on a par with Tatevosyan IMO in terms of overall talent
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

M'Baye the night he fought Rees was on a par with Peter Buckley.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Post by Horse »

Loftgroov wrote:Hmmm... How come sometimes rankings are adjudged to be meaningless (contrived and engineered by governing bodies) and at other times used to underpin how good someone is for the sake of argument?
We are talking about independent rankings, rather than sanctioning bodies rankings. Surely they have some meaning?
Loftgroov wrote:Froch is more of a talent than Rees. I suppose it depends what the criteria are for these rankings.
Perhaps I should have put Rees below Froch and Eastman, due to their much better overall records. But Rees beat a reigning "big four" World champion and now holds the WBA belt, so I had to have him somewhere near the top, and I thought the spot above Eastman looked about right.

Where would you have put him on my list?
Albert
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 419
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 14:43

Post by Albert »

Carl Froch not higher?

What is Scott Harrison still doing there.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Post by Horse »

~ MIKEE ~ wrote:
Horse wrote:
stujones wrote: Gavin Rees has beaten a top #7 fighter in his devision... Froch hasn't.
That is pretty much it.
Mbaye is on a par with Tatevosyan IMO in terms of overall talent
But M'baye had the WBA title and was highly ranked. Tatevosyan had lost numerous times and was not highly ranked.
nickd wrote:M'Baye the night he fought Rees was on a par with Peter Buckley.
Yes M'baye was crap.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Post by Horse »

Albert wrote:Carl Froch not higher?
No.
Albert wrote:What is Scott Harrison still doing there.
Not much.
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Post by m1kee50 »

Horse wrote:
~ MIKEE ~ wrote:
Horse wrote: That is pretty much it.
Mbaye is on a par with Tatevosyan IMO in terms of overall talent
But M'baye had the WBA title and was highly ranked. Tatevosyan had lost numerous times and was not highly ranked.
nickd wrote:M'Baye the night he fought Rees was on a par with Peter Buckley.
Yes M'baye was crap.
fair enough, i was jsut saying
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Post by Horse »

~ MIKEE ~ wrote:
Horse wrote:
~ MIKEE ~ wrote:Mbaye is on a par with Tatevosyan IMO in terms of overall talent
But M'baye had the WBA title and was highly ranked. Tatevosyan had lost numerous times and was not highly ranked.
fair enough, i was jsut saying
I appreciate your thoughts on the matter. I have not seen much of Tatevosyan so I would not know.
Post Reply