Brodie gets a belt

Post Reply
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Brodie gets a belt

Post by bennie »

MICHAEL Brodie will be awarded a World Boxing Council belt even though his magnificent scrap with Injin Chi last month ended in a farcical draw.

The WBC did itself no favours in the way it handled a brilliant contest at the Manchester Evening News Arena, when Korean hardman Chi was declared the winner - only for the verdict to be overturned and a majority draw declared 40 minutes after the final bell.

The two men are lined up for a re-match for the vacant title early next year, but in the meantime to compound the farce BOTH men will hold belts.

A problem arose because Chi, understandably upset at the way his hard-fought victory was quashed by a meeting of officials, was reluctant to hand the belt back afterwards.

WBC president Jose Sulaiman, letting discretion be the better part of valour, decided to let him keep it - and because the title remains vacant then decided that Brodie had better have a belt as well.

"I believe it's the first time in the history of the WBC that two fighters have held the belt at the same time," says Brodie's manager Jack Trickett.

Hopefully the whole sorry mess - which despoiled a fantastic contest - will be sorted out next year, with talks underway about a re-match.

Promoter Barry Hearn has already made an offer to Chi's people and is hopeful that the second fight can be brought back to Britain.

"We have made an offer and it looks like coming off, although nothing has been signed yet," says Trickett. "I know it will sell in Manchester. If it doesn't, there is no future for boxing."
mrbassie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1563
Joined: 26 Oct 2003, 00:55

Post by mrbassie »

Absurd.
Loftgroov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3712
Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 10:48

Post by Loftgroov »

Chi won that fight by 2 clear rounds (and I say that as a Brodie fan).

It's a disgrace he wasn't given the decision anyway, so it's hardly surprising he is reluctant to give back the belt.
The REAL McCoy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 280
Joined: 30 Aug 2003, 15:54

Post by The REAL McCoy »

What a joke :roll:
mrbassie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1563
Joined: 26 Oct 2003, 00:55

Post by mrbassie »

Loftgroov wrote:Chi won that fight by 2 clear rounds (and I say that as a Brodie fan).

It's a disgrace he wasn't given the decision anyway, so it's hardly surprising he is reluctant to give back the belt.
I also gave it to Chi by two, but I wouldn't say it's so clear cut, there was nothing really between them in the first nd the ninth and if you score those two rounds even then it's a draw.
Chambers
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 396
Joined: 10 Mar 2003, 12:11

Post by Chambers »

Loftgroov wrote:Chi won that fight by 2 clear rounds (and I say that as a Brodie fan).

It's a disgrace he wasn't given the decision anyway, so it's hardly surprising he is reluctant to give back the belt.
Agreed (I am also a Brodie Fan)
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13262
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

I thought you were going to say his ex-wife had showed up again..

What a great idea by the WBC - now they can have rival champs within their own organisation!

So this means the rematch is actualy a unification fight?

Surely this means PPV??? :D
Post Reply