Legal proceedings

Post Reply
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6244
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Post by JCS »

This is classic. Maybe you should e-mail or private message the site owner, rather then air this out on a public forum.

However, its more interesting for the lot of us.. so please continue in this thread.

Which info is false? Specifically?
Matt
Editor
Editor
Posts: 2290
Joined: 28 Dec 2001, 20:00

Post by Matt »

Is this when you are posing as "Greg Nicholas" in the wiki and adding self to manager/trainer/and promoter or when you are "Matthew Sanderson" and adding all the manager/trainer/promoters that I suppose are "false".

If Eubank's manager sues it may be you that is facing the libel charges.
Matt Ropis
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 21 Aug 2007, 18:02

Post by Matt Ropis »

Hey Matthew you,ve got the same christian name as me could your Lawyer work pro bono for me to make them get my record straight.
Matt Ropis
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Post by AntonS »

Yep! Class action is the way to go. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Marina
Editor
Editor
Posts: 655
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 18:20

Post by Marina »

Which are your user names in the wiki?
There is no material on that page from you unless you have multiple user names.
stac
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 502
Joined: 08 Jan 2002, 20:00

Post by stac »

libel is so hard to prove....fair comment and justification usually great defences......
wouter
Editor
Editor
Posts: 4801
Joined: 04 Feb 2002, 20:00

Post by wouter »

Matthew Sanderson wrote:Trainers, managers, promoters, amateur, family, all that info is mine take it down. Take it off.
You've copyrighted Eubank's family? :D
jomothepure
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2660
Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 08:43

Re: Legal proceedings

Post by jomothepure »

Matthew Sanderson wrote: I suggest you delete all the info in the encyclopedia (that I typed, by the way) because it is simply not true.
Am I tripping or somthing? You're saying the content should be deleted because it's false. You're also saying that you wrote it. Ergo you wrote the false information? In which case shouldn't John Regan get the solicitors onto you? I don't get it
scottmallon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 499
Joined: 08 Aug 2005, 20:41

Post by scottmallon »

Matthew Sanderson wrote:Trainers, managers, promoters, amateur, family, all that info is mine take it down. Take it off.
Shut up and go away already. Your rubbish posts have absolutely no specific information and yet you're foolish enough to think that just because you say something's false it will be taken off? Provide specifics and PROOF and then I'd say you come off less like an idiot.
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Post by claudevsq »

Only true... that guy is a great laugh, though... this forum's always relaxing me coming home from work! :TU:

Greetings from Luxembourg to everyone!
scottmallon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 499
Joined: 08 Aug 2005, 20:41

Post by scottmallon »

Matthew Sanderson wrote:It's my material, check the IP's, get it off please.
Just what I expected....
Post Reply