Can you take down my material please

Post by **Marina** » 29 Aug 2007, 09:53

IF you tell me your user names I will. There is no material from 'Matthew Sanderson' on there.

Musashi · Post by **Musashi** » 29 Aug 2007, 09:57

Who is Matthew Sanderson?

jomothepure · Post by **jomothepure** » 29 Aug 2007, 10:22

jomothepure wrote:
Matthew Sanderson wrote: I suggest you delete all the info in the encyclopedia (that I typed, by the way) because it is simply not true.
Am I tripping or somthing? You're saying the content should be deleted because it's false. You're also saying that you wrote it. Ergo you wrote the false information? In which case shouldn't John Regan get the solicitors onto you? I don't get it

Post by **Marina** » 29 Aug 2007, 10:35

The info below reach was not entered by the user Matthew Sanderson. Therefor I am not deleting it.
I have told you that before. Stop claiming something that is not true.

Matt · Post by **Matt** » 29 Aug 2007, 11:16

Eubank's managers can be referenced too. So it's not as if the info is false. Matthew Sanderson is just bitter because he was banned.

jomothepure · Post by **jomothepure** » 29 Aug 2007, 13:50

Matthew Sanderson wrote: Take all the info below 'Reach: 185' off - http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Human:804

You mean this then?

Trainers: Maximo Pierret

Managers: Adonis Torres, Ronnie Davies, Barry Hearn

Promoters: Keith Miles, Barry Hearn, allegedly

Amateur Accomplishments
Winner of 1984 Spanish Golden Gloves
Boxing Family
Brothers - Peter Eubanks and Simon Eubanks (twins)
Cousin - Bobbie Joe Edwards

If that's the case, you're seriously mental. It cannot be copyrighted. Maybe there's something there that indicates it was you who wrote it, but, nevertheless, even so, you're mad. not to mention uptight. What do you want them to write? His manager was Timmy Mallet.

Person A writes that England won the 1966 world cup on a website.
Person B writes that England won the 1966 world cup on another website. Slightly later. Should person A sue person B?

Or, is this what you're trying to say...

Person A writes that England won the 1967 world cup on a website.
Person B writes that England won the 1967 world cup on another website. Slightly later. Ok, looks like person B might have copied person A. However, given the fact that person A got it wrong anyway, and that it's such a trifling matter, maybe person A shouldn't bother about it?