It's next Friday the 7th.....


Piss poor post AlbertAlbert wrote:A lot of people are saying this is a close fight, I have to agree with that.
What I cannot bear to hear is whoever the winner is you can nail your house money, and life savings on him calling out Hatton or Mayweather and that is a joke.
This fight is between 2 good boxers beyond their better years who would have no chance against either Mayweather or Hatton. Witter would have done 3 or 4 years ago but for whatever reason in my opinion he has not progressed one little bit. Look at his record, look at the struggles he has had then tell me Witter is at the top of his game and deserves a place anywhere in the top 15 pound for pound best boxers in the world.
Anyone who wishes to argue just look at what the boxing fans think of this fight, just look at what the general public think of this fight, if people genuinally thought Witter was top notch and going places then why oh why is it not in a bigger arena and why oh why if Witter is that much in the forefront of peoples minds isn't the fight a pay per view fight.
Its not because when people sit down and think rationally about this fight, they are a little intrigued about the outcome after they will probably use the DVD recording of the fight to send them to sleep in the future.
Has Witter's chin really been tested enough at the top level to say that confidently though? He ran as soon as he tasted Zab's power and the biggest puncher he's faced sine then it N'dou and IMO Harris hits harder and is a better fighter than him.hitman_hatton1 wrote:no way.sweetscience wrote:harris KO
good odds to 6/1
witter's always had a good chin.
Chambers2 wrote:Personally I can't see Harris stopping Witter, because you won't hit Junior if he doesn't want to get hit
The odds ain't great, but I've had to back Witter to win by KO rounds 5-8. Harris is getting KTFO!!!!!
![]()
Who else is saying that Witter shouldn't call out Hatton and Mayweather, if he beats Harris? Most champions call for the BIG fights, why shouldn't Witter? I'd be more pissed off if he didn't want to test himself against the bestAlbert wrote:Search and Chambers,
You 2 identified my post as a poor one. Looking at the other replies it seems the majority are in agreement with me.