stujones wrote:Who was McGuigan's stat man for the Cotto vs Judah bill for Setanta - was there anyone. There seemed to be a live spat between Bunce and McGuigan and because McGuigan correctly (IMO) stated that the record of Zuniga suggested the Bunce opinion was wrong... Bunce then said stuff like "well you in the studio have the advantage of looking at Computers etc".... Thats more than likely correct.
Does this mean though that because Barry relies on notes and relies on nick other peoples work/opinions that he knows nowt about the sport.... Absolutely rediculous if you believe that. For me, knowledge of the sport is not if you know the date of when Sugar Ray Robinson fought Jake La Motta the second time or if you can analyse the information that fight fax provides - but if you can have a feel for a fight. If you know when a fighter is tiring, if you can see that a body shot (or something) is working and hurting etc etc. Can generally pick up what is going on in front of you. I don't care if you have never seen these two fighters in your life.
There a plenty of guys who have an excellent grasp of English and there are plenty of people who can read and remember fight records - people who actually know whats happening in front of them is not so common. McGuigan certainly knows that.
Well I think it was the Hatton-Castillo bill Stu wasn’t it? The spat started over the Zuniga- Echolls fight where Bunce wasn’t calling the action but giving opinions and anecdotes and saying that the fight should be stopped. McGuigan said something along the lines that Zuniga is a big puncher, obviously referring to his record, but hadn’t put Echolls over. Echolls was punching back throughout and, although his legs didn’t look great to begin with, everytime he took a decent shot Duke and Bunce were saying it was ridiculous that the fight wasn’t stopped. Then Bunce belted up and gave an anecdote that Echolls reminded him of some of those ex fighters that hang around Vegas hoping to get on the end of an entourage leading the next flavour of the month out. Whether he is right or wrong in that, there is no place for it live commentary IMO. It is totally out of order and disrespectful to both fighters and to the game. I think this rubbed McGuigan up the wrong way and I couldn’t have agreed more because I didn’t like it at the time either (I had an online spat with AB online at the time).
You would never get an ex-fighter saying something like that because they respect what it takes to be in there in the first place. McGuigan, if he understands anything, knows what it takes to start boxing at an early age, sacrifice much and achieve in the amateur game and go on to single mindedly produce as a professional (however brief that was).
As you rightly say, any boxing writer with a good or great grasp of the English language can swot up and retain knowledge, watch all the back catelogue of fights and everything in running and acquire a slant based on what the ‘great’ boxing writers of the past have written. There is much to be criticised in boxing, but it shouldn’t start with the raw material – the fighters themselves. There’s plenty of bollocks surrounding the sport for sharply honed critics to get their teeth into.
I don’t care for Bunce his voice irritates me, his tenor irritates me and what he has to say is peripheral to what interests me – the fight itself. I have more interest in a reasonably articulate ex world champion analysing a fight than someone that has never had the balls or inclination to lace a glove up (mind you Duke disappoints me a lot). I have no need for the colour that he provides, but I unselfishly acknowledge that he has a place in the game.