Collins just slagged Calzaghe on RTE

hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

kalambay was class.

he outboxed collins and graham first time around.

i agree that calzaghe would have beaten him though.

he outboxed mccallum which was the result of his career. :box: mccallum knew what he had in front of him 2nd time around though. :TU:

87 to 97 was stronger.

i'd still pick calzaghe over a lot of those guys though.
ArtOfWar
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1253
Joined: 24 Oct 2003, 11:54

Post by ArtOfWar »

Autobarn wrote:well, Calzaghe is in a strong era right now...
No he isn't.
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

ArtOfWar wrote:
Autobarn wrote:well, Calzaghe is in a strong era right now...
No he isn't.
not much out there for joe after kessler is there.

bernard hopkins who is 43 in january.

kelly pavlik has a likely rematch with taylor coming up.

u got chad dawson who looks the best at light heavy next to b-hop.

slim pickings. :roll:
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

Not strong? Calzaghe, Lacy, Kessler, Bute, Mundine (if he regains enough sight) Inkin, Froch, Braehmer, Pavlik (yes, next fight at 166 lbs and he'll never get back down to 160), Taylor, Miranda (more middles moving up), Allan Green (rebounding), Andrade, Beyer, Zuniga (coming off 2 career-best wins), not forgetting Pascal (making major strides, rated top 10 by Ring already) and Darren Barker & Karo Murat (on the way up)...need I say more?

Fvcking bollocks it's not strong.
ArtOfWar
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1253
Joined: 24 Oct 2003, 11:54

Post by ArtOfWar »

Autobarn wrote:Not strong? Calzaghe, Lacy, Kessler, Bute, Mundine (if he regains enough sight) Inkin, Froch, Braehmer, Pavlik (yes, next fight at 166 lbs and he'll never get back down to 160), Taylor, Miranda (more middles moving up), Allan Green (rebounding), Andrade, Beyer, Zuniga (coming off 2 career-best wins), not forgetting Pascal (making major strides, rated top 10 by Ring already) and Darren Barker & Karo Murat (on the way up)...need I say more?

Fvcking bollocks it's not strong.
After Calzaghe and Kessler there is a significant drop off. Lacy hasn't done shit since taking a beating from Calzaghe and it remains to be seen whether he can really bounce back. Bute is a young guy with bags of talent, but is still proving himself. Mundine is a inconsistent and after that you are clutching at straws. Pavlik and Taylor aren't super middles yet and who says Pavlik won't go back? It's not him that wants to fight at a catch weight it's Taylor.

The division is not weak, but it's not strong either.
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

ArtOfWar wrote:
Autobarn wrote:Not strong? Calzaghe, Lacy, Kessler, Bute, Mundine (if he regains enough sight) Inkin, Froch, Braehmer, Pavlik (yes, next fight at 166 lbs and he'll never get back down to 160), Taylor, Miranda (more middles moving up), Allan Green (rebounding), Andrade, Beyer, Zuniga (coming off 2 career-best wins), not forgetting Pascal (making major strides, rated top 10 by Ring already) and Darren Barker & Karo Murat (on the way up)...need I say more?

Fvcking bollocks it's not strong.
After Calzaghe and Kessler there is a significant drop off. Lacy hasn't done shit since taking a beating from Calzaghe and it remains to be seen whether he can really bounce back. Bute is a young guy with bags of talent, but is still proving himself. Mundine is a inconsistent and after that you are clutching at straws. Pavlik and Taylor aren't super middles yet and who says Pavlik won't go back? It's not him that wants to fight at a catch weight it's Taylor.

The division is not weak, but it's not strong either.
yeah what proven greats are around calzaghe???

some of those names are decent contenders.

but nothing that does anything for the legacy really.

where's the meat and 2 veg. :-?

fortunately hops is still out there.

but he'll be 43 soon. :roll:
ArtOfWar
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1253
Joined: 24 Oct 2003, 11:54

Post by ArtOfWar »

hitman_hatton1 wrote:
ArtOfWar wrote:
Autobarn wrote:Not strong? Calzaghe, Lacy, Kessler, Bute, Mundine (if he regains enough sight) Inkin, Froch, Braehmer, Pavlik (yes, next fight at 166 lbs and he'll never get back down to 160), Taylor, Miranda (more middles moving up), Allan Green (rebounding), Andrade, Beyer, Zuniga (coming off 2 career-best wins), not forgetting Pascal (making major strides, rated top 10 by Ring already) and Darren Barker & Karo Murat (on the way up)...need I say more?

Fvcking bollocks it's not strong.
After Calzaghe and Kessler there is a significant drop off. Lacy hasn't done shit since taking a beating from Calzaghe and it remains to be seen whether he can really bounce back. Bute is a young guy with bags of talent, but is still proving himself. Mundine is a inconsistent and after that you are clutching at straws. Pavlik and Taylor aren't super middles yet and who says Pavlik won't go back? It's not him that wants to fight at a catch weight it's Taylor.

The division is not weak, but it's not strong either.
yeah what proven greats are around calzaghe???

some of those names are decent contenders.

but nothing that does anything for the legacy really.

where's the meat and 2 veg. :-?

fortunately hops is still out there.

but he'll be 43 soon. :roll:
Exactly. Everybody talks about the heavyweight division being weak, but the truth is every division from middleweight on up is weak. You've got one or two stand out guy's in each division and then it falls off. No real depth at all.
Deram
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 168
Joined: 25 Sep 2005, 22:55

Post by Deram »

Eubanks, Collins and Benn was an uncredibly strong era for British 168. Internationally, it was nothing out of the ordinary.

The current era is at least as strong and probably stronger.

But it is rare for any country to have such a hold on a division, so from a British point of view it was a great time - and notably it did not come because the standard was poor. It was a good standard those three had, so all credit were credit is due.
STP
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 937
Joined: 26 Feb 2007, 08:38

Post by STP »

Twinkle Toes wrote:
STP wrote:Kalambay was a MASTER. He schooled (yes, schooled) Herol Graham and Mike McCallum in their primes!!
Schooled Graham?

Are you actually attempting to be serious? - Graham was very unlucky not to take that fight, he was a good winner on my card.

It was a typical Italian decision.
The first fight ;)

Kalambay was never the same after the Nunn KO (Nunn closed his eyes and threw a window maker).
STP
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 937
Joined: 26 Feb 2007, 08:38

Post by STP »

Deram wrote:Eubanks, Collins and Benn was an uncredibly strong era for British 168. Internationally, it was nothing out of the ordinary.

The current era is at least as strong and probably stronger.

But it is rare for any country to have such a hold on a division, so from a British point of view it was a great time - and notably it did not come because the standard was poor. It was a good standard those three had, so all credit were credit is due.
Benn and also Eubank were in their pomps in the late 80s and early 90s, both of the guys only boxed for money at super-middleweight - hence defending a world title against nobodies and openly waiting as long as possible before even considering a Nunn or a Toney or a Jones.

But the difference is Calzaghe hasn't had a bum of the month club, he's had a bum of the year club! That's 12 times worse!

As for Collins, the guy couldn't tie Eubank's laces if Chris was near his best. Though he'd always make Benn quit because he could take the blows.
STP
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 937
Joined: 26 Feb 2007, 08:38

Post by STP »

And really who was Steve Collins before the Eubank fight? I'd heard of him, and do recall seeing him at Olympia on Eubank and Benn (Eubank against Lindell 'dont call me Larry' Holmes and Benn's great scrap with Southern Area-standard, chain-smoking cruiserweight Lou Gent) undercards looking ordinary. I don't recall seeing the Collins-Pyatt and I don't think ITV got good figures for it, either.
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

STP wrote:
Deram wrote:Eubanks, Collins and Benn was an uncredibly strong era for British 168. Internationally, it was nothing out of the ordinary.

The current era is at least as strong and probably stronger.

But it is rare for any country to have such a hold on a division, so from a British point of view it was a great time - and notably it did not come because the standard was poor. It was a good standard those three had, so all credit were credit is due.
Benn and also Eubank were in their pomps in the late 80s and early 90s, both of the guys only boxed for money at super-middleweight - hence defending a world title against nobodies and openly waiting as long as possible before even considering a Nunn or a Toney or a Jones.

But the difference is Calzaghe hasn't had a bum of the month club, he's had a bum of the year club! That's 12 times worse!

As for Collins, the guy couldn't tie Eubank's laces if Chris was near his best. Though he'd always make Benn quit because he could take the blows.
Rubbish. Prime Benn would have beaten Collins.
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3340
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Post by Twinkle Toes »

STP wrote: The first fight ;)

Kalambay was never the same after the Nunn KO (Nunn closed his eyes and threw a window maker).
Apologies - When I think of Kalambay and Graham, I auto think of that disgrace of a second fight :)

It says a lot that Collins was easily outpointed by Kalambay later on in the same year, and adds fuel to the fire that he did catch Eubank/Benn at just the right time.
ArtOfWar
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1253
Joined: 24 Oct 2003, 11:54

Post by ArtOfWar »

Deram wrote:Eubanks, Collins and Benn was an uncredibly strong era for British 168. Internationally, it was nothing out of the ordinary.

The current era is at least as strong and probably stronger.

But it is rare for any country to have such a hold on a division, so from a British point of view it was a great time - and notably it did not come because the standard was poor. It was a good standard those three had, so all credit were credit is due.
Are you kidding me? Jones, Toney, Barkley, Kalamby, McCallum, Nunn etc, nothing out of the ordinary? That era was as strong as the super middleweight division has ever been. Today's super middleweight division is not even close to what it was back then.
Post Reply