Also, we could only allow people with British location to vote (appreciate they don't do this on Current Scene but am concerned that Americans won't have seen the likes of Derry Matthews for debate).
Thoughts?
British Top 30 P4P November 2007
Do we vote on this list ala Current Scene. If not, maybe we should to give a better consensus view. I do think Scott Harrison staying there is a bit off, as he's been immobile for too long. Maybe have a rule that if they haven't fought in 12 months they become innactive (although this could be detrimental for injuries I guess).
Also, we could only allow people with British location to vote (appreciate they don't do this on Current Scene but am concerned that Americans won't have seen the likes of Derry Matthews for debate).
Thoughts?
Also, we could only allow people with British location to vote (appreciate they don't do this on Current Scene but am concerned that Americans won't have seen the likes of Derry Matthews for debate).
Thoughts?
I am Horse, how are you doing?Captain Hook wrote:Because:
a) Who are you?
Strange question, I chose 30 because having 10 would have only covered World class, having 20 would have only covered European class and above, but having 30 covers World, European and Domestic class.Captain Hook wrote:b) Why are there only 30 rather than 10, 25 or 30?
Half is ridiculous? Surely not. I question these statistics.Captain Hook wrote:c) Nobody on here agrees with half of it, the other half is ridiculous.
Which fighters have disappeared after a win?Captain Hook wrote:Fighters seem to go own or disappear out of it when they win!
Yes, please let me Captain.MIKEE wrote:Who are you? if he wants to put him up and provoke some discussion, let him...Captain Hook wrote:Because:
a) Who are you?
b) Why are there only 30 rather than 10, 25 or 30?
c) Nobody on here agrees with half of it, the other half is ridiculous.
Fighters seem to go own or disappear out of it when they win!
There is no vote, but if anyone posts their own list I combine it with mine to create a consensus list; however, I am not sure how many people see those lists (when they occur).Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Do we vote on this list ala Current Scene. If not, maybe we should to give a better consensus view. I do think Scott Harrison staying there is a bit off, as he's been immobile for too long. Maybe have a rule that if they haven't fought in 12 months they become innactive (although this could be detrimental for injuries I guess).
Also, we could only allow people with British location to vote (appreciate they don't do this on Current Scene but am concerned that Americans won't have seen the likes of Derry Matthews for debate).
Thoughts?
As for the "inactive rule": I am against it, as I feel if a fighter is inactive for a long time then they will fall out of the list eventually anyway; although, it may take longer than 12 months.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
...what a top 30 every week that makes no sense? What are you, his minder? Some sensitive souls on this site :)MIKEE wrote:Who are you? if he wants to put him up and provoke some discussion, let him...Captain Hook wrote:Because:
a) Who are you?
b) Why are there only 30 rather than 10, 25 or 30?
c) Nobody on here agrees with half of it, the other half is ridiculous.
Fighters seem to go own or disappear out of it when they win!
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
It is every Month actually, but point taken. :)Captain Hook wrote:Keep posting it then Horse, and we'll keep asking you why Scott Harrison is up there every week! What a debate.....
I was planning on taking him off after Christmas, but with the comeback talk I am going to see what comes of that before I take him off.Captain Hook wrote:Will you at least take him off if he does not fight before Xmas?