No you're not the only one - 'The Fight' veers from bits of very engaging, insightful prose which are evocative of boxing to lengthy spells of overwriting.fatton wrote:I take it I'm the only one who thought "The Fight" was dull and too wordy then?
It reminded me of Michael Murray's autobiography, far too concerned with sounding clever than being a decent read. I accept most people will see the above line as a terrible slur on Mailer but sorry "The Fight" just didn't do it for me although I accept I could quite possibly be in a minority of 1.
RIP Norman though, I did enjoy some of his other stuff and clearly he was a great character.
However, you must be completely insane to compare the book to Murray's autobiography (no offence intended).
My favourite Mailer anecdote is when he crazily agreed to chair a discussion on feminism, recorded live in New York. I don't think I saw another male face there but some real heavyweight female hitters were and feminism seemed to be at its height - you know, the likes of Germaine Greer were incredibly popular.
Mailer had absolutely zero support and if any of the so-called intellectual women piped up - even if what they were saying was shite - they were cheered to the rafters. Every utterance from Mailer, even if nondescript, was greeted with derision.
At one point, Mailer (remembering this was recorded live for telly and there were hundreds of bra burners there) just said, "I'm not going to sit here and let you harridans harangue me...tug my forelock and say 'Yes'm'. F*ck you!"
I paraphrase but it was class.
R.I.P. Norman Mailer - one crazy, talented guy.