UK v's USA

Post Reply
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

UK v's USA

Post by sweetscience »

as us brits seemed to be kicking arse on the world scene what do you think the results would be if we pitted our best v's their best

as follows maybe:-

Skelton v Thompson
Haye v Cunningham
Calzaghe v Hopkins
Froch v Lacy
Duddy v Pavlik
Moore v Spinks/De Le Hoya
Hatton v PBF
Witter v Hopkins/Mallinargi
Khan/Thaxton/Earl v Diaz
Arthur v Rocky Jaurses
Matthews v Luevanno

i left the lower weights out cause neither have much depth

i think we would give them a bit of a kicking - i a might post this on the current scene just to rub there noses in it :TU:
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: UK v's USA

Post by oliverfennell »

sweetscience wrote:as us brits seemed to be kicking arse on the world scene what do you think the results would be if we pitted our best v's their best

as follows maybe:-

Skelton v Thompson
Haye v Cunningham
Calzaghe v Hopkins
Froch v Lacy
Duddy v Pavlik
Moore v Spinks/De Le Hoya
Hatton v PBF
Witter v Hopkins/Mallinargi
Khan/Thaxton/Earl v Diaz
Arthur v Rocky Jaurses
Matthews v Luevanno

i left the lower weights out cause neither have much depth

i think we would give them a bit of a kicking - i a might post this on the current scene just to rub there noses in it :TU:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27499
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: UK v's USA

Post by stujones »

sweetscience wrote:as us brits seemed to be kicking arse on the world scene what do you think the results would be if we pitted our best v's their best

as follows maybe:-

Skelton v Thompson
Haye v Cunningham
Calzaghe v Hopkins
Froch v Lacy
Duddy v Pavlik
Moore v Spinks/De Le Hoya
Hatton v PBF
Witter v Hopkins/Mallinargi
Khan/Thaxton/Earl v Diaz If you mean Juan.
Arthur v Rocky Jaurses
Matthews v Luevanno
i left the lower weights out cause neither have much depth

i think we would give them a bit of a kicking - i a might post this on the current scene just to rub there noses in it :TU:
Neri
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 01 May 2003, 00:41

Re: UK v's USA

Post by Neri »

Neri says wrote: Skelton v Thompson
Haye v Cunningham
Calzaghe v Hopkins
Froch v Lacy
Duddy v Pavlik
Moore v Spinks, Moore v De La Hoya
Hatton v PBF
Witter v Hopkins
Khan/Thaxton/Earl v Diaz
Arthur v Rocky Juarez DRAW
Matthews v Luevanno
Mario
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 358
Joined: 09 Oct 2006, 05:57

Re: UK v's USA

Post by Mario »

Skelton v Thompson
Haye v Cunningham
Calzaghe v Hopkins
Froch v Lacy
Duddy v Pavlik
Moore v Spinks/De Le Hoya MOORE OVER SPINKS
Hatton v PBF
Witter v Hopkins/Mallinargi
Khan/Thaxton/Earl v Diaz
Arthur v Rocky Juarez
Matthews v Luevanno
josh fg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 20:30

Re: UK v's USA

Post by josh fg »

sweetscience wrote:as us brits seemed to be kicking arse on the world scene what do you think the results would be if we pitted our best v's their best

as follows maybe:-

Skelton v Thompson
Haye v Cunningham
Calzaghe v Hopkins although if the odds are long enough I'm betting on BHOP
Froch v Lacy
Duddy v Pavlik are you fornicating kidding me
Moore v Spinks/De Le Hoya
Hatton v PBF
Witter v Hopkins/Mallinargi
Khan/Thaxton/Earl v Diaz don't know enough about Diaz
Arthur v Rocky Jaurses
Matthews v Luevanno don't know enough about both

i left the lower weights out cause neither have much depth

i think we would give them a bit of a kicking - i a might post this on the current scene just to rub there noses in it :TU:
HairyBoxe24
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 218
Joined: 04 Jul 2006, 19:28

Post by HairyBoxe24 »

Wouldn't post it on Currentscene, as many of ours would get knocked out.
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Post by Carbo »

Skelton v Thompson
Haye v Cunningham
Calzaghe v Hopkins
Froch v Lacy
Duddy v Pavlik
Moore v Spinks/De Le Hoya
Hatton v PBF
Witter v Hopkins/Mallinargi
Khan/Thaxton/Earl v Diaz
Arthur v Rocky Jaurses
Matthews v Luevanno
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Post by DavidPayne »

Williams v THOMPSON
HAYE v Cunningham
WOODS v Hopkins
CALZAGHE v Lacy
Eastman v PAVLIK
Moore v SPINKS
HATTON v Floyd
WITTER v Mallinargi
Thaxton v DIAZ
Arthur v JUAREZ
Matthews v LUEVENNO

5-6 to the USA. IF YOU PICK THE RIGHT TEAM.
Podmore_Birmingham
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 950
Joined: 18 Oct 2005, 09:38

Re: UK v's USA

Post by Podmore_Birmingham »

Skelton v Thompson
Haye v Cunningham
Calzaghe v Hopkins
Froch v Lacy
Elcock v Pavlik
Moore v Spinks
Hatton v PBF
Witter v Malignaggi
Thaxton v Diaz
Arthur v Rocky Juarez
Matthews v Luevanno

Tom Podmore.
Last edited by Podmore_Birmingham on 21 Nov 2007, 07:51, edited 1 time in total.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

Haye would flatten the awful Cunningham
Tykemania
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 540
Joined: 15 Nov 2007, 20:22

Post by Tykemania »

DavidPayne wrote:Williams v THOMPSON
HAYE v Cunningham
WOODS v Hopkins
CALZAGHE v Lacy
Eastman v PAVLIK
Moore v SPINKS
HATTON v Floyd
WITTER v Mallinargi
Thaxton v DIAZ
Arthur v JUAREZ
Matthews v LUEVENNO

5-6 to the USA. IF YOU PICK THE RIGHT TEAM.
Slightly amended, but if you pick the RIGHT team...

HAYE v Thompson
MACCARINELLI v Cunningham
CALZAGHE or WOODS v Hopkins
FROCH or CALZAGHE v Lacy
Elcock v PAVLIK
Moore v SPINKS***
HATTON v Floyd***
WITTER v Mallinargi
Thaxton v DIAZ
ARTHUR v Juarez
Matthews v LUEVENNO

Would make 7-4 to the Brits. The two I've asterisked are debateable - I wonder if Moore (or Bradley Price) might edge out Spinks, and Hatton to beat Floyd may well be aspirational. However, even allowing for two defeats, we still go over 6 to 5.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27499
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

I am a bit surprised that I am the only one to tip Cunnigham to beat the weight drained Haye we saw two weeks ago.

If they made it at 15 stone then I agree with you all, just think he is not going to reign very long should he stick to Cruiser. Cunnigham might not be as strong as Mormeck - but he is slick and quicker, and Mormeck was catching Haye too easily.
josh fg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 20:30

Post by josh fg »

I think those who put it Haye Thompson Enzo Cunningham were perhaps more realistic. Those could well be two british wins.
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Post by sweetscience »

josh fg wrote:I think those who put it Haye Thompson Enzo Cunningham were perhaps more realistic. Those could well be two british wins.
i agree with those two changes to my original list
Post Reply