1. Hatton
2. Calzaghe
3. Haye
4. Witter
5. Woods
6. Arthur
7. Maccarinelli
8. Froch
9. Moore
10. Rees
11. Lynes
12. Khan
13. Thaxton
14. Jennings
15. Cook
16. Pryce
17. Macklin
18. Johanneson
19. Mitchell
20. Dunne
British Pound For Pound Consensus Poll
Bugger! Dunne no12, put Elcock no14, and move everyone else down one so then Francis is ommitted, Earl stays at 13Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Could you clarify number 12 please Coco, Elcock or Dunne?Coco wrote:1. Calzaghe
2. Hatton
3. Haye
4. Witter
5. Woods
6. Maccrinelli
7. Rees
8. Arthur
9. Froch
10. Nicky Cook
11. Lynes
12. Elcock Bernard Dunne
13. Earl
14. John Duddy
15. Hunter
16. Moore
17. Khan
18. Pryce
19. Thaxton
20. Francis
10-20 was hard to do, i've ommitted Alexander and McCulloch thru inactivity, Skelton, Lockett, Mitchell, and Jennings were close to the list to
Bugger! Dunne no12, put Elcock no14, and move everyone else down one so then Francis is ommitted, Earl stays at 13Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Could you clarify number 12 please Coco, Elcock or Dunne?Coco wrote:1. Calzaghe
2. Hatton
3. Haye
4. Witter
5. Woods
6. Maccrinelli
7. Rees
8. Arthur
9. Froch
10. Nicky Cook
11. Lynes
12. Elcock Bernard Dunne
13. Earl
14. John Duddy
15. Hunter
16. Moore
17. Khan
18. Pryce
19. Thaxton
20. Francis
10-20 was hard to do, i've ommitted Alexander and McCulloch thru inactivity, Skelton, Lockett, Mitchell, and Jennings were close to the list to
Bugger! Dunne no12, put Elcock no14, and move everyone else down one so then Francis is ommitted, Earl stays at 13Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Could you clarify number 12 please Coco, Elcock or Dunne?Coco wrote:1. Calzaghe
2. Hatton
3. Haye
4. Witter
5. Woods
6. Maccrinelli
7. Rees
8. Arthur
9. Froch
10. Nicky Cook
11. Lynes
12. Elcock Bernard Dunne
13. Earl
14. John Duddy
15. Hunter
16. Moore
17. Khan
18. Pryce
19. Thaxton
20. Francis
10-20 was hard to do, i've ommitted Alexander and McCulloch thru inactivity, Skelton, Lockett, Mitchell, and Jennings were close to the list to
-
Dirk Kelly
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 4971
- Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13
Surely i'm going blind.... REE's ???
TOP 10 P4P in Britain ?
His combined list of opponents read as follows:-
W269 - L711
I appreciate he won that Hatton-discarded title from the Frenchman who inherited it, in what i can only say was a very weird fight indeed.
Im not a hater and would love him to do well - but i cannot see him above Jamie Moore or Carl Froch based on achievements so far as M'Baye was a load of pony anyway who lost against Kotelenik in my opinion in that 'draw'.... i wouldn't put him even above Colin Lynes or Ted Bami.. let alone Hunter or some of the others.
TOP 10 P4P in Britain ?
His combined list of opponents read as follows:-
W269 - L711
I appreciate he won that Hatton-discarded title from the Frenchman who inherited it, in what i can only say was a very weird fight indeed.
Im not a hater and would love him to do well - but i cannot see him above Jamie Moore or Carl Froch based on achievements so far as M'Baye was a load of pony anyway who lost against Kotelenik in my opinion in that 'draw'.... i wouldn't put him even above Colin Lynes or Ted Bami.. let alone Hunter or some of the others.
Yeah come on a lot of effort has gone into this over a number of weeks now so we know you are out there about the other topics on the form come on give us your top 20 and let's do this thing right! 
(there's some real shockers mind you, if your list is embarrassing don't worry, I guarantee there'll be a worse one somewhere!)
(there's some real shockers mind you, if your list is embarrassing don't worry, I guarantee there'll be a worse one somewhere!)
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
REVISED
1 Calzaghe
2 Hatton
3 Witter
4 Haye
5 Woods
6 Arthur
7 Maccarinelli
8 Lynes
9 Froch
10 Rees
11 Moore
12 Pryce
13 Thaxton
14 Hunter
15 Napa
16 Cook
17 Elcock
18 Williams
19 Matthews
20 Lockett
I'm sure it would be different tomorrow. McIntyre, Johannson, Jennings, Khan, Francis, Lockett et al....are worthy candidates. . No Eastman seems hard to fathom too, but he's not a winning fighter poresently. If he beats Duddy he could crack the top 12. Cook is hard to place too.
2 Hatton
3 Witter
4 Haye
5 Woods
6 Arthur
7 Maccarinelli
8 Lynes
9 Froch
10 Rees
11 Moore
12 Pryce
13 Thaxton
14 Hunter
15 Napa
16 Cook
17 Elcock
18 Williams
19 Matthews
20 Lockett
I'm sure it would be different tomorrow. McIntyre, Johannson, Jennings, Khan, Francis, Lockett et al....are worthy candidates. . No Eastman seems hard to fathom too, but he's not a winning fighter poresently. If he beats Duddy he could crack the top 12. Cook is hard to place too.
Last edited by DavidPayne on 29 Nov 2007, 07:09, edited 1 time in total.
Bami cannot be included as he isn't Bitish, Irish, or has fought for a British or Irish title. The decision was made earlier in this thread to exclude British Residents, as it could change at any time and was too complicated to maintain.DavidPayne wrote:1 Calzaghe
2 Hatton
3 Witter
4 Haye
5 Woods
6 Arthur
7 Maccarinelli
8 Lynes
9 Froch
10 Rees
11 Moore
12 Pryce
13 Thaxton
14 Hunter
15 Napa
16 Cook
17 Elcock
18 Bami
19 Williams
20 Matthews
I'm sure it would be different tomorrow. McIntyre, Johannson, Jennings, Khan, Francis, Lockett et al....are worthy candidates. Bami arguably lucky to be there given his activity. No Eastman seems hard to fathom too, but he's not a winning fighter poresently. If he beats Duddy he could crack the top 12. Cook is hard to place too.
Please let me know what you want to do.
Sorry mate.
-
Phenomenal-Nutrition
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 5185
- Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53