Hatton v DLH Wouldn't sell out Wembley, would it? Be
-
King Tubby
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6306
- Joined: 16 Nov 2007, 06:52
Hatton v DLH Wouldn't sell out Wembley, would it? Be
the equivalent of Liverpool playing a pre season friendly in Malaysia or somewhere.
If Calzaghe v Kessler can attract over 50,000, why not.
The average sports fan probably doesn't know who Kessler is, but they may have heard of DLH.
Provided they don't take the pss with ticket prices, and put on a good undercard (hopefully GBP fighters v UK fighters), I'd expect this to attract 70,000+
The average sports fan probably doesn't know who Kessler is, but they may have heard of DLH.
Provided they don't take the pss with ticket prices, and put on a good undercard (hopefully GBP fighters v UK fighters), I'd expect this to attract 70,000+
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6150
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
-
Greg Nicholas
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 516
- Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 19:21
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
-
Greg Nicholas
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 516
- Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 19:21
Fcuk the DLH fight! Thats a fight for the yanks and for Rickys bank balance, what's wrong with a meaningful fight with Witter or Cotto?
DLH's lost 3 of his last 5 and one of those wins came from a gift decision against Felix Sturm. The yanks seem to cream themselves everytime DLH farts, I don't see why us Brits should be following suit
DLH's lost 3 of his last 5 and one of those wins came from a gift decision against Felix Sturm. The yanks seem to cream themselves everytime DLH farts, I don't see why us Brits should be following suit
-
Greg Nicholas
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 516
- Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 19:21
If Ricky was truly interested in fighting Witter or Cotto, he would have in place of Maussa, Collazo, Urango or a shot Castillo.. he didn't, because he knows they'd probably stop him and he's a money fighter..
Last edited by Greg Nicholas on 06 Dec 2007, 07:08, edited 1 time in total.
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
-
Greg Nicholas
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 516
- Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 19:21
Rickys took a risk in fighting PBF, hopefully he'll continue the trend after Mayweather, but I doubt it. However the risk to his legacy when fighting Mayweather is minimal due to PBF's stature in boxing, where as the proper risks his legacy are against the likes of Witter.)Greg Nicholas wrote:If Ricky was truly interested in fighting Witter or Cotto, he would have in place of Maussa, Collazo, Urango or a shot Castillo.. he didn't, because he knows they'd probably stop him and he's a money fighter..
WIN, lose or draw on Saturday, I certainly won't be calling for Hatton-DLH
-
Greg Nicholas
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 516
- Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 19:21
But he's fighting the best fighter in the world - you just said it yourself - so you are contradicting yourself about Hatton only being a money fighter (and by implication not takiing risks).Greg Nicholas wrote:He's getting £10000000 to fight the 'best p4p fighter in the world'.. some risk..
Which is it? You can't have it both ways.
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6150
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
-
Greg Nicholas
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 516
- Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 19:21
How is it a risk fighting the 'best p4p fighter'..? Noone gave him a prayer when the fight was made, infact noone was even interested because they thought it would be so one-sided and pointless, it took Ricky being confident in interviews to generate interest.. so he was in a no-lose sitution.. and now this purse is just hideous.. if Ricky does lose convincingly then everyone should wash their hands with him, because apparently Mayweather 'doesn't stand a chance', and that's all that generated interest (and his bank balance)..
-
Dirk Kelly
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4971
- Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13
Top PostChambers2 wrote:Fcuk the DLH fight! Thats a fight for the yanks and for Rickys bank balance, what's wrong with a meaningful fight with Witter or Cotto?
DLH's lost 3 of his last 5 and one of those wins came from a gift decision against Felix Sturm. The yanks seem to cream themselves everytime DLH farts, I don't see why us Brits should be following suit
Agree with you on this Chambers - Hatton -V- Cotto would be great!
...but Witter v Hatton wouldn't. Witter needs at least one more high profile win before he can even consider being in Hatton's league. Plus the money would be shit as it wouldn't appeal to the Yanks.Stegsie wrote:Top PostChambers2 wrote:Fcuk the DLH fight! Thats a fight for the yanks and for Rickys bank balance, what's wrong with a meaningful fight with Witter or Cotto?
DLH's lost 3 of his last 5 and one of those wins came from a gift decision against Felix Sturm. The yanks seem to cream themselves everytime DLH farts, I don't see why us Brits should be following suit![]()
Agree with you on this Chambers - Hatton -V- Cotto would be great!
Like it or not, they drive the numbers for a boxers bank balance.