Fighters Who Came From Way Back To Win
-
dagosd2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 8638
- Joined: 01 Sep 2007, 03:31
Fighters Who Came From Way Back To Win
Criteria:Fighters who were down early or way behind on points to come back to win the fight.
I'll jump on an obvious one. Moore/Durelle I. I saw the replay the other night. What got me is the way the back of Archie's head hit the canvas. Ouch! I've never seen a fighter get up from something like that. No wonder Durelle said Moore was the best he ever fought.
I'm sure you guys have a lot more fights to contribute
I'll jump on an obvious one. Moore/Durelle I. I saw the replay the other night. What got me is the way the back of Archie's head hit the canvas. Ouch! I've never seen a fighter get up from something like that. No wonder Durelle said Moore was the best he ever fought.
I'm sure you guys have a lot more fights to contribute
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Marciano-Walcott
probably the greatest example I can think of where not a single round was won by the challenger [even though he was the favorite to win], and then the most famous kayo in history occured.
Louis-Walcott 2 is another good example, as Louis was far behind on points, and then came the kayo in the 11th round. Conn-Louis also deserves a good mention, though it wasnt as wide as some people make it out to be, it was quite competitive.
Louis-Walcott 2 is another good example, as Louis was far behind on points, and then came the kayo in the 11th round. Conn-Louis also deserves a good mention, though it wasnt as wide as some people make it out to be, it was quite competitive.
-
Diamond WEAPON
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1729
- Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32
Toney-Nunn (Toney was losing big on all scorecards and unleashed a furious amount of punches in the 11th to put him away),
Pavlik-Taylor (Looked like Taylor was about to expose Pavlik in the 2nd when he rocked the shit out of him only to be KO'd himself 5 rounds later)
Chavez-Taylor (One of the most obvious ones, where Taylor was outlanding Chavez constantly throughout the entire fight and Chavez finally finished taking him apart and stopping him with 2 seconds left).
Pavlik-Taylor (Looked like Taylor was about to expose Pavlik in the 2nd when he rocked the shit out of him only to be KO'd himself 5 rounds later)
Chavez-Taylor (One of the most obvious ones, where Taylor was outlanding Chavez constantly throughout the entire fight and Chavez finally finished taking him apart and stopping him with 2 seconds left).
-
Ambling Alp
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3627
- Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31
Homocide-What do you mean not a single round was won by the challenger? Two judges gave Marciano 4 rounds, and one gave him 5. It was a competitive fight. I thought you were a Marciano fan?HomicideHenry wrote:Marciano-Walcottprobably the greatest example I can think of where not a single round was won by the challenger [even though he was the favorite to win], and then the most famous kayo in history occured.
![]()
Louis-Walcott 2 is another good example, as Louis was far behind on points, and then came the kayo in the 11th round. Conn-Louis also deserves a good mention, though it wasnt as wide as some people make it out to be, it was quite competitive.
Last edited by Ambling Alp on 08 Dec 2007, 13:18, edited 1 time in total.
-
Ambling Alp
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3627
- Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Agreed about Marciano-Walcott I. I have that fight & there's no way it was anything close to a shut-out. In fact, time has distorted how far ahead Walcott was. No question he was leading, but it was not a mismatch on the cards. The same is true about the first Louis-Conn encounter. People will tell you Conn was in an unbeatable position & schooling Louis but the reality --- quite apart from the myth --- is that it was quite close & very competitive, it was still possible for Louis to win without a knockout.
Marciano-Walcott I was come-from-behind but it wasn't a one-sided contest.
Marciano-Walcott I was come-from-behind but it wasn't a one-sided contest.
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
See, I think IMO this is another Marciano-Walcott I situation. At the end of the seventh, I had Foreman up 4-3. Quite possibly Ali could be in front on someone's scorecard at the time.observer1 wrote:Ali v Foreman, Rumble in the Jungle
The revisionist history doesn't really fit the actual bout. Foreman was largely ineffectual with his punches, landing partially or missing altogether. In contrast, though Ali wasn't as busy, he was quite precise, & cut through Foreman's defense very well. The main reason I had Foreman ahead was on the basis that he was forcing the fight & also because he did not break off one single exchange all night. It was Ali forcing the clinches & that counted against him, however for the cleaner punching & superior ring generalship Ali had it all the way.
Whatever the case, that was actually a very close fight on the cards at the time of the knockout (& this comes from a die-hard Big George supporter).
What might have been, had he won that fight...
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
-
scartissue
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1893
- Joined: 31 Mar 2002, 20:00
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15683
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Say what??? Foreman winning the fight???Goodnight, Irene wrote:See, I think IMO this is another Marciano-Walcott I situation. At the end of the seventh, I had Foreman up 4-3. Quite possibly Ali could be in front on someone's scorecard at the time.observer1 wrote:Ali v Foreman, Rumble in the Jungle
The revisionist history doesn't really fit the actual bout. Foreman was largely ineffectual with his punches, landing partially or missing altogether. In contrast, though Ali wasn't as busy, he was quite precise, & cut through Foreman's defense very well. The main reason I had Foreman ahead was on the basis that he was forcing the fight & also because he did not break off one single exchange all night. It was Ali forcing the clinches & that counted against him, however for the cleaner punching & superior ring generalship Ali had it all the way.
Whatever the case, that was actually a very close fight on the cards at the time of the knockout (& this comes from a die-hard Big George supporter).
What might have been, had he won that fight...
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
foreman was winning the fight... history has made peole beleive ali did nothing but lay against the ropes for seven rounds and when foreman was tired started to throw some hits but on the contrary ali was still putting rounds in the bank so if he couldnt knock foreman out he could take a points win. it was one of the most masterfully thought out fights ever that victory in my opinion beats any other heavyweights victory the thing to remember is people where worried about ali being killed or badly braindamaged(i guess they were right eventualliy very very unfortunatly) they gave him less of a chance than he had been given against liston the only possibility of a bigger upset was tyson vs douglas but that was tysons fault he didnt train properly foreman trained hard for ali and was in prime physical shapeelmersalsa wrote:Say what??? Foreman winning the fight???Goodnight, Irene wrote:See, I think IMO this is another Marciano-Walcott I situation. At the end of the seventh, I had Foreman up 4-3. Quite possibly Ali could be in front on someone's scorecard at the time.observer1 wrote:Ali v Foreman, Rumble in the Jungle
The revisionist history doesn't really fit the actual bout. Foreman was largely ineffectual with his punches, landing partially or missing altogether. In contrast, though Ali wasn't as busy, he was quite precise, & cut through Foreman's defense very well. The main reason I had Foreman ahead was on the basis that he was forcing the fight & also because he did not break off one single exchange all night. It was Ali forcing the clinches & that counted against him, however for the cleaner punching & superior ring generalship Ali had it all the way.
Whatever the case, that was actually a very close fight on the cards at the time of the knockout (& this comes from a die-hard Big George supporter).
What might have been, had he won that fight...![]()
![]()