BoxRec

Captain Hook wrote:PS This thread became very bizarre very quickly!

Jeff Thomas wrote:

tonysaprano wrote:

Jeff Thomas wrote: What 'degree's' did you do?

Well it wasnt english lit as you can tell First one, psychology, aye dont laugh, I dont know why either, fuckin bored the tits off me but had to finish it, got a 2/2, then went back a few years later and done a joint Physiology/sports science,got a 2/1, although I couldnt take any modules over so had to start again from scratch, pisser. Looking back on it I wish I just got a job in a gym and learned on the job from someone really good, , cause 70% of stuff you get there aint relevant when you get out. What you doing anyways??

I'm doing management and I have recently qualified as a personal trainer. I'm hoping to perhaps undetake a strength and condtioning to degree next year to run along side the final year of my management degree but I have to balance that with family, and running my own business.


You never referenced during your degree's? It was hardly a citation but using a piece of writing or theory to back up your own idea's is the foundation of every piece of work I do. Even in finance. Thats how it works here pal, all suggestions need to be backed up with relevant reading and/or opinions from proffessionals that support the writers findings. I struggle to see how you could write a piece on psychology without citing aprevious piece of work or evidence?

big lennox wrote:

SexySouthPaw wrote:Respect to Kerry Kayes he knows his stuff thats the reason he has been so successful in his business life.
LEE BEARD ,the question is who the F+?K is he?
He is the WIZARD OF OZ of boxing ,all smoke and mirrors.
The reason he is behind so many prospects is that fact if u blow smoke up someones arse for long enough they start to believe their own hype.
Lee Beard will ruin a few prospects careers before the day is done.

This sounds a bit harsh.Is this from personal experience? He seems like a decent bloke and everyone has to start out somewhere, and if he has the confidence of Hatton and Guzman, he must be doing something right.

King Geedorah wrote:

SexySouthPaw wrote:

big lennox wrote: This sounds a bit harsh.Is this from personal experience? He seems like a decent bloke and everyone has to start out somewhere, and if he has the confidence of Hatton and Guzman, he must be doing something right.

Actually he messed up with Guzman as Guzman failed to make the weight

Nonsense. You can lead the horse to water but you can't force it to drink, especially if the horse in question has some complete arsehead bringing him 7 Up late at night.

Kayes did loads for boxers. Many more fighters understand nutrition and the benefits of hydration due to his work. He was used as a scapegoat by a few of the people around Guzman.