Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
-
No Tomorrow
- Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Would be awesome if Hopkins got the stoppage. That'd be huge
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
MachoTime wrote:Ditto. Or is it he looks like he has the lack of "Eye of The Tiger"columbo wrote:Is it me or is Shumenov looking very gaunt?
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
This is gonna be a complete stinker I can sense it...
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
1-0 Shumenov
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Omg Shumenov stinks.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
I rarely score rounds even, but I couldn't find any reason to score that 1st round for anybody.
10-10
10-10
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17241
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
First round to Shumenov. I hope the rest of the fight isn't like the first because if it is we are in for one boring and brutal fight.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
1-0 Shumenov but not much to split them.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
10-10
Neither fighter did anything worth shouting about, took Hopkins a minute to throw a punch.
Neither fighter did anything worth shouting about, took Hopkins a minute to throw a punch.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
I thought Shumenov landed some more jabsgilgamesh wrote:I rarely score rounds even, but I couldn't find any reason to score that 1st round for anybody.
10-10
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
9-9 no?gilgamesh wrote:I rarely score rounds even, but I couldn't find any reason to score that 1st round for anybody.
10-10
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
2-0 Shumenov .... just on output more than anything. Not much going on at all.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
I don't think so, but like I said I rarely score rounds even.MachoTime wrote:9-9 no?gilgamesh wrote:I rarely score rounds even, but I couldn't find any reason to score that 1st round for anybody.
10-10
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17241
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
2nd to Shumenov also. He did slightly better than Hopkins.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
I agree.columbo wrote:2-0 Shumenov .... just on output more than anything. Not much going on at all.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
20-19 Shumenov for me, and yeah not much happening.columbo wrote:2-0 Shumenov .... just on output more than anything. Not much going on at all.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
20-19 Shumenov
Nicked it purely on workrate, Hopkins landed a couple of right hands but nothing else.
Nicked it purely on workrate, Hopkins landed a couple of right hands but nothing else.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Shumenov is composed, should use hos jab more
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
30-28 Shumenov
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17241
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
3rd to Hopkins.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Found that 3rd round to score. Probably Hopkins as he scored the more eye catching shots. Hopkins seems to be only throwing about 5 punches per round though!
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
29-29
Hopkins landed some clean punches, including a good right hand while Shumenov was complaining, another close round.
Hopkins landed some clean punches, including a good right hand while Shumenov was complaining, another close round.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Both of these guys would/will get massacred by Stevenson and Kovalev though I think.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Hopkins starting to get into a bit of a groove now.