BoxRec

Cygnus475 wrote:

Purse Bid Shakedown wrote:

Cygnus475 wrote:
Very few boxers are "the man" when they retire. Most boxers keep coming back and end up broke or punch drunk. Ggg isn't a 40 year old man who's cleared out his division so again, BAD EXAMPLE. He doesn't have the luxury to cherry pick and put his feet on the table because he still has a lot to prove.

To be fair, Floyd probably got irritated all these young guys kept ducking each other hoping to win the mayweather sweepstakes fighting weak competition.

As for when the last time he was the best at welter...uh, maybe last may when he beat the p4p champ pacquiao??? Pac had beaten bradley, may beat maidana and canelo, everyone else had gotten the crap kicked out of them besides thurman.

Kovalev is about to fight ward and has been trying to make a fight with Stevenson. If he beats ward there is absolutelyno arguing who the top p4p fighter is. Kovalev has Hopkins on his resume for crying out loud.

Question: who has a better resume, wilder or triple g?

As for missing the point, no, if you've been reading the thread I've been making that point from the beginning. If canelo loses or gets stripped ggg is top dog at middleweight and he doesn't necessarily need to fight all these contenders I'm pretty sure he'd beat anyway. I literally already said that a few posts ago.

OK great, you got something right. But Floyd beat Pac 3 months before retiring. Youre saying he stopped being The Man in those 3 months? Either way after beating Pac he only had 1-2 current top 10 scalps, so surely not the Man, per your requirements?

So you concede GGG is the most dominant champ in boxing, until Kovalev Ward at least. Great, you're already making progress. Now let's get past the next hurdle: yes GGG has a much better resume than Wilder.

What? Am I just not good at explaining myself or do you just suck horribly at reading comprehension?

Floyd was the man at welter but then he fought berto and ignored his mandatories to retire on top. With him being 40 it was a little bit understandable. The difference is Floyd can come back today and still be right back where he was 10 months ago because he's that good. He's earned it. No one was within 100 yards of being within his tier.

I was saying the opposite. You clearly didn't read or understand my posts. Having 1-2 scalps you missed when you've been dominating 20 years is completely different from missing 5 scalps when you'vebeen dominating 5 years. Its far less of a black mark. And again ggg is still in his prime.

Um, when did I say ggg was the most dominant champ? I said kovalev should be consider the higher p4p fighter like 3 times now. Try to keep up.

Wladmir, kovalev, and chocalatito have been way more dominant and have far less to prove. I would argue Crawford and wilder are on the same peg as him. But if canelo loses or vacates I'll be more than happy to put ggg as top 5.

Mind explaining how ggg is sooo much better than wilder...???

No you're not good at explaining yourself, that's what everyone is telling you. So for current divisional rankings you go 20 years 5 not enough? It's not 1-2 missed scalps, Floyd had 1-2 wins over the current top 10 when he beat Pac. That's 8-9 missed scalps, much to prove. Canelo was not at welter, look it up, expert.

You didn't say Kovalev was more dominant, you talked about his future fights. But I wouldn't argue either way, close call. Top 2 most dominant champ in boxing works. Klitschko lost, right? You watch much boxing?

GGG is unified, with 7 Ring top 10 scalps, and dominant at his weight. Wilder neither, with 1 top 10 scalp. Why would you need help with this?

So your giving floyd a pass for being 40 yet kovalev rates so high because he has Hopkins scalp, a 50 year old, is that what you wrote, 2nd if GGG fought Lara and KOd him you would be the 1st to say he was a blown up JMW, why do you think all of the intelligent posters on here are all saying Lara needs to fight at MW before fighting GGG, have you noticed the heat canelo is copping for fighting khan, exactly the same thing, you obviously haven't had ANYTHING to do with boxing and it shows in your ignorant posting

Purse Bid Shakedown wrote:

Cygnus475 wrote:

Purse Bid Shakedown wrote: OK great, you got something right. But Floyd beat Pac 3 months before retiring. Youre saying he stopped being The Man in those 3 months? Either way after beating Pac he only had 1-2 current top 10 scalps, so surely not the Man, per your requirements?

So you concede GGG is the most dominant champ in boxing, until Kovalev Ward at least. Great, you're already making progress. Now let's get past the next hurdle: yes GGG has a much better resume than Wilder.

What? Am I just not good at explaining myself or do you just suck horribly at reading comprehension?

Floyd was the man at welter but then he fought berto and ignored his mandatories to retire on top. With him being 40 it was a little bit understandable. The difference is Floyd can come back today and still be right back where he was 10 months ago because he's that good. He's earned it. No one was within 100 yards of being within his tier.

I was saying the opposite. You clearly didn't read or understand my posts. Having 1-2 scalps you missed when you've been dominating 20 years is completely different from missing 5 scalps when you'vebeen dominating 5 years. Its far less of a black mark. And again ggg is still in his prime.

Um, when did I say ggg was the most dominant champ? I said kovalev should be consider the higher p4p fighter like 3 times now. Try to keep up.

Wladmir, kovalev, and chocalatito have been way more dominant and have far less to prove. I would argue Crawford and wilder are on the same peg as him. But if canelo loses or vacates I'll be more than happy to put ggg as top 5.

Mind explaining how ggg is sooo much better than wilder...???

No you're not good at explaining yourself, that's what everyone is telling you. So for current divisional rankings you go 20 years 5 not enough? It's not 1-2 missed scalps, Floyd had 1-2 wins over the current top 10 when he beat Pac. That's 8-9 missed scalps, much to prove. Canelo was not at welter, look it up, expert.

You didn't say Kovalev was more dominant, you talked about his future fights. But I wouldn't argue either way, close call. Top 2 most dominant champ in boxing works. Klitschko lost, right? You watch much boxing?

GGG is unified, with 7 Ring top 10 scalps, and dominant at his weight. Wilder neither, with 1 top 10 scalp. Why would you need help with this?

Whoa, whoah, Floyd missed 8 scalps and still had "much" to prove at welter?!?

Please list the 8 fighters he missed out on.

Yes Klitschko lost but once again you haven't read the thread. I said it was a lopsided fight and now they're having an immediate rematch because not a lot of people are sold on fury. Do you watch boxing...?

So your giving floyd a pass for being 40 yet kovalev rates so high because he has Hopkins scalp, a 50 year old, is that what you wrote, 2nd if GGG fought Lara and KOd him you would be the 1st to say he was a blown up JMW, why do you think all of the intelligent posters on here are all saying Lara needs to fight at MW before fighting GGG, have you noticed the heat canelo is copping for fighting khan, exactly the same thing, you obviously haven't had ANYTHING to do with boxing and it shows in your ignorant posting

Because Hopkins has been in shape and performing well at 50 with a win over shumenov and looking good even in his losing effort against kovalev.

Mayweather is not the same fighter 10 years ago or even 5 years ago.

As for lara don't assume things. Ive actually boxed before and moving up 6-8 lbs is no big deal I would give ggg his props if he beat lara I've already said that.

No people make a big deal out of Khan vs Canelo because canelo is a blasted light heavyweight when he rehydrates and is naturally bigger. On top of that he was supposed to have fought ggg ages ago and picks a guy with a weak chin who moved up in weight. It would be like tommy hearns moved up to heavyweight and fought holmes.

The more you write the more your lack of knowledge shows, you move the goalposts to suit your agenda when it comes to Hopkins and floyd, name me on fighter who has dragged a fighter up from a division below, beaten him and has been applauded for it, it doesn't happen, if canelo and his team thought they had a good chance of beating GGG the fight would have already happened, loeffner said in an articl not long ago that he has never had any offer from Lara's management, can you name 1 better MW

Pureist wrote:The more you write the more your lack of knowledge shows, you move the goalposts to suit your agenda when it comes to Hopkins and floyd, name me on fighter who has dragged a fighter up from a division below, beaten him and has been applauded for it, it doesn't happen, if canelo and his team thought they had a good chance of beating GGG the fight would have already happened, loeffner said in an articl not long ago that he has never had any offer from Lara's management, can you name 1 better MW

Again you are talking about lara as if he's moving up from featherweight. Lara would be moving up 6 lbs at best. If you think he should take a couple fights at that weight first fine, idc.

All I'm saying is if he's such a joke why is ranked #1 in his division and why did canelo feel the pressure to fight him? If he was a joke oscar would have advised ginger head to ignore him but the boxing works made a big deal out of it. This is common knowledge. To quote Manny Pacquiao "if I'm so easy to beat, take the fight and prove it".

Moving on,

I didn't shift the goalposts I was very clear. If Floyd looked like the same phenomenal matador who embarrassed canelo and fought an impressive war with cotto I'd give him all kinds of hell for picking berto and retiring. He has obviously slowed down in foot speed, timing and reflexes. He hasn't looked that good his last three fights, maidana is B+ ar best and mayweather struggled for all 24 rounds. Hopkins on the other hand continued to look amazing and consistent with no sign of slowing down. Age is relative. At 38 Ali got beat up by spinks, Foreman went to war with a prime holyfield.

No I can't name anyone other than Canelo at middle who I think has more than a 50% chance of beating ggg. We're going in circles, I said half a dozen times if he loses or gets stripped ggg is without a doubt #1 at middle and a top ten if not top five p4p. In the meantime canelo has the better resume whether you like it or not and there isnt much you can do to convince me otherwise. Boxing is about what you've DONE.

>Still waiting for someone to explain how ggg is leagues ahead of wilder.

>still waiting for the 8 so called scalps mayweather missed that ruined his reputation at welter

Cygnus475 wrote:

Purse Bid Shakedown wrote:

Cygnus475 wrote:
What? Am I just not good at explaining myself or do you just suck horribly at reading comprehension?

Floyd was the man at welter but then he fought berto and ignored his mandatories to retire on top. With him being 40 it was a little bit understandable. The difference is Floyd can come back today and still be right back where he was 10 months ago because he's that good. He's earned it. No one was within 100 yards of being within his tier.

I was saying the opposite. You clearly didn't read or understand my posts. Having 1-2 scalps you missed when you've been dominating 20 years is completely different from missing 5 scalps when you'vebeen dominating 5 years. Its far less of a black mark. And again ggg is still in his prime.

Um, when did I say ggg was the most dominant champ? I said kovalev should be consider the higher p4p fighter like 3 times now. Try to keep up.

Wladmir, kovalev, and chocalatito have been way more dominant and have far less to prove. I would argue Crawford and wilder are on the same peg as him. But if canelo loses or vacates I'll be more than happy to put ggg as top 5.

Mind explaining how ggg is sooo much better than wilder...???

No you're not good at explaining yourself, that's what everyone is telling you. So for current divisional rankings you go 20 years 5 not enough? It's not 1-2 missed scalps, Floyd had 1-2 wins over the current top 10 when he beat Pac. That's 8-9 missed scalps, much to prove. Canelo was not at welter, look it up, expert.

You didn't say Kovalev was more dominant, you talked about his future fights. But I wouldn't argue either way, close call. Top 2 most dominant champ in boxing works. Klitschko lost, right? You watch much boxing?

GGG is unified, with 7 Ring top 10 scalps, and dominant at his weight. Wilder neither, with 1 top 10 scalp. Why would you need help with this?

Whoa, whoah, Floyd missed 8 scalps and still had "much" to prove at welter?!?

Please list the 8 fighters he missed out on.

Yes Klitschko lost but once again you haven't read the thread. I said it was a lopsided fight and now they're having an immediate rematch because not a lot of people are sold on fury. Do you watch boxing...?

So your giving floyd a pass for being 40 yet kovalev rates so high because he has Hopkins scalp, a 50 year old, is that what you wrote, 2nd if GGG fought Lara and KOd him you would be the 1st to say he was a blown up JMW, why do you think all of the intelligent posters on here are all saying Lara needs to fight at MW before fighting GGG, have you noticed the heat canelo is copping for fighting khan, exactly the same thing, you obviously haven't had ANYTHING to do with boxing and it shows in your ignorant posting

Because Hopkins has been in shape and performing well at 50 with a win over shumenov and looking good even in his losing effort against kovalev.

Mayweather is not the same fighter 10 years ago or even 5 years ago.

As for lara don't assume things. Ive actually boxed before and moving up 6-8 lbs is no big deal I would give ggg his props if he beat lara I've already said that.

No people make a big deal out of Khan vs Canelo because canelo is a blasted light heavyweight when he rehydrates and is naturally bigger. On top of that he was supposed to have fought ggg ages ago and picks a guy with a weak chin who moved up in weight. It would be like tommy hearns moved up to heavyweight and fought holmes.

Damn you're clueless. So 50 year old Hopkins was closer to prime than 40 year old p4p #1 Floyd?

I couldn't have been clearer, when Floyd beat Pac he hadn't faced 8-9 of the Ring top 10 at welter, as of may 2015. This is easy to check.

How can Klitschko be a dominant champ if he's not a champ at all? I suspect your problems go way beyond a total lack of knowledge of boxing

Cygnus475 wrote:

Pureist wrote:The more you write the more your lack of knowledge shows, you move the goalposts to suit your agenda when it comes to Hopkins and floyd, name me on fighter who has dragged a fighter up from a division below, beaten him and has been applauded for it, it doesn't happen, if canelo and his team thought they had a good chance of beating GGG the fight would have already happened, loeffner said in an articl not long ago that he has never had any offer from Lara's management, can you name 1 better MW

Again you are talking about lara as if he's moving up from featherweight. Lara would be moving up 6 lbs at best. If you think he should take a couple fights at that weight first fine, idc.

All I'm saying is if he's such a joke why is ranked #1 in his division and why did canelo feel the pressure to fight him? If he was a joke oscar would have advised ginger head to ignore him but the boxing works made a big deal out of it. This is common knowledge. To quote Manny Pacquiao "if I'm so easy to beat, take the fight and prove it".

Moving on,

I didn't shift the goalposts I was very clear. If Floyd looked like the same phenomenal matador who embarrassed canelo and fought an impressive war with cotto I'd give him all kinds of hell for picking berto and retiring. He has obviously slowed down in foot speed, timing and reflexes. He hasn't looked that good his last three fights, maidana is B+ ar best and mayweather struggled for all 24 rounds. Hopkins on the other hand continued to look amazing and consistent with no sign of slowing down. Age is relative. At 38 Ali got beat up by spinks, Foreman went to war with a prime holyfield.

No I can't name anyone other than Canelo at middle who I think has more than a 50% chance of beating ggg. We're going in circles, I said half a dozen times if he loses or gets stripped ggg is without a doubt #1 at middle and a top ten if not top five p4p. In the meantime canelo has the better resume whether you like it or not and there isnt much you can do to convince me otherwise. Boxing is about what you've DONE.

>Still waiting for someone to explain how ggg is leagues ahead of wilder.

>still waiting for the 8 so called scalps mayweather missed that ruined his reputation at welter

This is too obvious but I took the time to give you this elementary lesson above. You missed it, forgot, or had trouble processing?

Purse Bid Shakedown wrote:

Cygnus475 wrote:

Purse Bid Shakedown wrote: No you're not good at explaining yourself, that's what everyone is telling you. So for current divisional rankings you go 20 years 5 not enough? It's not 1-2 missed scalps, Floyd had 1-2 wins over the current top 10 when he beat Pac. That's 8-9 missed scalps, much to prove. Canelo was not at welter, look it up, expert.

You didn't say Kovalev was more dominant, you talked about his future fights. But I wouldn't argue either way, close call. Top 2 most dominant champ in boxing works. Klitschko lost, right? You watch much boxing?

GGG is unified, with 7 Ring top 10 scalps, and dominant at his weight. Wilder neither, with 1 top 10 scalp. Why would you need help with this?

Whoa, whoah, Floyd missed 8 scalps and still had "much" to prove at welter?!?

Please list the 8 fighters he missed out on.

Yes Klitschko lost but once again you haven't read the thread. I said it was a lopsided fight and now they're having an immediate rematch because not a lot of people are sold on fury. Do you watch boxing...?

So your giving floyd a pass for being 40 yet kovalev rates so high because he has Hopkins scalp, a 50 year old, is that what you wrote, 2nd if GGG fought Lara and KOd him you would be the 1st to say he was a blown up JMW, why do you think all of the intelligent posters on here are all saying Lara needs to fight at MW before fighting GGG, have you noticed the heat canelo is copping for fighting khan, exactly the same thing, you obviously haven't had ANYTHING to do with boxing and it shows in your ignorant posting

Because Hopkins has been in shape and performing well at 50 with a win over shumenov and looking good even in his losing effort against kovalev.

Mayweather is not the same fighter 10 years ago or even 5 years ago.

As for lara don't assume things. Ive actually boxed before and moving up 6-8 lbs is no big deal I would give ggg his props if he beat lara I've already said that.

No people make a big deal out of Khan vs Canelo because canelo is a blasted light heavyweight when he rehydrates and is naturally bigger. On top of that he was supposed to have fought ggg ages ago and picks a guy with a weak chin who moved up in weight. It would be like tommy hearns moved up to heavyweight and fought holmes.

Damn you're clueless. So 50 year old Hopkins was closer to prime than 40 year old p4p #1 Floyd?

I couldn't have been clearer, when Floyd beat Pac he hadn't faced 8-9 of the Ring top 10 at welter, as of may 2015. This is easy to check.

How can Klitschko be a dominant champ if he's not a champ at all? I suspect your problems go way beyond a total lack of knowledge of boxing

Mayweather was on a steeper decline than Hopkins but he still had better competition overall.

So let me get this straight.

Ggg doesn't need to waste his time constantly fighting the top ten ranked young undefeated fighters and gets off the hook if he can beat the #1 guy canelo.

But according to you, mayweather had unfinished business at welter even though he beat the top dog at welter pacquiao???

I'm aware Klitschko isn't the current champion, you're pretending to misunderstand me on purpose. I said it wasn't a blow out and a lot of people aren't convinced by fury. You act like I'm just making this stuff up. One close, unconvincing decision=/=getting the crap beat out of you convincingly. The latter doesn't apply to fury v Klitschko. Happens all the time in boxing. No one was convinced by spinks vs Holmes or Ali vs Liston and the public and the sanctioning bodies demanded a rematch. This is the last time I will explain this.

Purse Bid Shakedown wrote:

Cygnus475 wrote:

Pureist wrote:The more you write the more your lack of knowledge shows, you move the goalposts to suit your agenda when it comes to Hopkins and floyd, name me on fighter who has dragged a fighter up from a division below, beaten him and has been applauded for it, it doesn't happen, if canelo and his team thought they had a good chance of beating GGG the fight would have already happened, loeffner said in an articl not long ago that he has never had any offer from Lara's management, can you name 1 better MW

Again you are talking about lara as if he's moving up from featherweight. Lara would be moving up 6 lbs at best. If you think he should take a couple fights at that weight first fine, idc.

All I'm saying is if he's such a joke why is ranked #1 in his division and why did canelo feel the pressure to fight him? If he was a joke oscar would have advised ginger head to ignore him but the boxing works made a big deal out of it. This is common knowledge. To quote Manny Pacquiao "if I'm so easy to beat, take the fight and prove it".

Moving on,

I didn't shift the goalposts I was very clear. If Floyd looked like the same phenomenal matador who embarrassed canelo and fought an impressive war with cotto I'd give him all kinds of hell for picking berto and retiring. He has obviously slowed down in foot speed, timing and reflexes. He hasn't looked that good his last three fights, maidana is B+ ar best and mayweather struggled for all 24 rounds. Hopkins on the other hand continued to look amazing and consistent with no sign of slowing down. Age is relative. At 38 Ali got beat up by spinks, Foreman went to war with a prime holyfield.

No I can't name anyone other than Canelo at middle who I think has more than a 50% chance of beating ggg. We're going in circles, I said half a dozen times if he loses or gets stripped ggg is without a doubt #1 at middle and a top ten if not top five p4p. In the meantime canelo has the better resume whether you like it or not and there isnt much you can do to convince me otherwise. Boxing is about what you've DONE.

>Still waiting for someone to explain how ggg is leagues ahead of wilder.

>still waiting for the 8 so called scalps mayweather missed that ruined his reputation at welter

This is too obvious but I took the time to give you this elementary lesson above. You missed it, forgot, or had trouble processing?

Actually you never explained why ggg is better than wilder. Quote an unedited post of yours where you've done so and I'll concede.

Here's the bottom line:

You look at ring's middleweight rankings TODAY, and lil g, who has held a version of the belt
for half a decade, has only managed to fight 2 guys in the top ten (only 1 of the top 8)

Here is Ring's welter standings at the end of 2014:

Floyd Mayweather Jr., Champion

Manny Pacquiao
Kell Brook
Amir Khan
Timothy Bradley
Juan Manuel Marquez
Shawn Porter
Keith Thurman
Robert Guerrero
Marcos Rene Maidana
Diego Gabriel Chaves

As you can see, Floyd had fought 3 of the top 10 and his next fight was against the # 2 guy

No one should compare lil g's mixture of journeymen, and b-levels with the elite guys Floyd fights anyway.

That total of 2 guys in the top 10 lil g has fought? It's a career high.

Going back to when he won a belt, you will only find one guy in the top 10 that lil g
managed to fight by the end of each beltholding year.

Which means a guy that fights 4 or 5 times a year mostly avoids top tier competition.

Which is exactly the problem I have with him.

Why did you use 2014 kooli need I ask

Purse Bid Shakedown wrote:

Cygnus475 wrote:

Purse Bid Shakedown wrote: OK great, you got something right. But Floyd beat Pac 3 months before retiring. Youre saying he stopped being The Man in those 3 months? Either way after beating Pac he only had 1-2 current top 10 scalps, so surely not the Man, per your requirements?

So you concede GGG is the most dominant champ in boxing, until Kovalev Ward at least. Great, you're already making progress. Now let's get past the next hurdle: yes GGG has a much better resume than Wilder.

What? Am I just not good at explaining myself or do you just suck horribly at reading comprehension?

Floyd was the man at welter but then he fought berto and ignored his mandatories to retire on top. With him being 40 it was a little bit understandable. The difference is Floyd can come back today and still be right back where he was 10 months ago because he's that good. He's earned it. No one was within 100 yards of being within his tier.

I was saying the opposite. You clearly didn't read or understand my posts. Having 1-2 scalps you missed when you've been dominating 20 years is completely different from missing 5 scalps when you'vebeen dominating 5 years. Its far less of a black mark. And again ggg is still in his prime.

Um, when did I say ggg was the most dominant champ? I said kovalev should be consider the higher p4p fighter like 3 times now. Try to keep up.

Wladmir, kovalev, and chocalatito have been way more dominant and have far less to prove. I would argue Crawford and wilder are on the same peg as him. But if canelo loses or vacates I'll be more than happy to put ggg as top 5.

Mind explaining how ggg is sooo much better than wilder...???

No you're not good at explaining yourself, that's what everyone is telling you. So for current divisional rankings you go 20 years 5 not enough? It's not 1-2 missed scalps, Floyd had 1-2 wins over the current top 10 when he beat Pac. That's 8-9 missed scalps, much to prove. Canelo was not at welter, look it up, expert.

You didn't say Kovalev was more dominant, you talked about his future fights. But I wouldn't argue either way, close call. Top 2 most dominant champ in boxing works. Klitschko lost, right? You watch much boxing?

GGG is unified, with 7 Ring top 10 scalps, and dominant at his weight. Wilder neither, with 1 top 10 scalp. Why would you need help with this?

Cygnus475 wrote:
Actually you never explained why ggg is better than wilder. Quote an unedited post of yours where you've done so and I'll concede.

Smh...

Ya'll still indulging novel boy? Why? Give him the and be done with it.

OK I was wrong about wilder.

Now address the rest. You know, your hilarious attempt to prove ggg has a better resume than mayweather.

No one said that reading comprehension expert, you stated GGG hasn't fought enough rated fighters, Floyd was used as an example, you have no idea

Pureist wrote:No one said that reading comprehension expert, you stated GGG hasn't fought enough rated fighters, Floyd was used as an example, you have no idea

Because it's not the same you imbecile.

Floyd has fought and beaten rated fighters and champions for 20 years.

He's also 40 yeas old. Ggg is 33 and the only decent fighter I can think of on his resume is lemiux. Mayweather is a household name and so are many of his opponents.

It was only in his last year as a fighter that he isn't cleaning out the top fighters of his division.

It's a bad example. You're grasping at straws. This is really pathetic if you need to drag down the best fighter of the last ten years to prop up little g.

Let's do a comparison then, first 34 fights of each, 1st floyd, via ring ranking as per year he fought each guy, he fought 8 top 10 contenders, had 23 stoppages and 11 UD, with one fight that he definitely lost, Castillo, was gifted that win, he had 2 belts in that time--------- GGG, same applies, ring ranking as per year he fought each guy, he fought 6 top 10 contenders, had 31 stoppages and 3 UD, he has 3 full belts and 1 interim belt------- really quite similar at the same point in career except that the KO% is much higher

Pureist wrote:Let's do a comparison then, first 34 fights of each, 1st floyd, via ring ranking as per year he fought each guy, he fought 8 top 10 contenders, had 23 stoppages and 11 UD, with one fight that he definitely lost, Castillo, was gifted that win, he had 2 belts in that time--------- GGG, same applies, ring ranking as per year he fought each guy, he fought 6 top 10 contenders, had 31 stoppages and 3 UD, he has 3 full belts and 1 interim belt------- really quite similar at the same point in career except that the KO% is much higher

Not sure if I should , , or

Pureist wrote:Why did you use 2014 kooli need I ask

Floyd retired in 2015. Using the rankings as of Dec 2014 is the best snapshot as far as who he'd already fought and who he should fight. If lil g had a similar snapshot today, we'd have already gotten some of the fights we should have seen a long time ago, and the future would be giving us the best fight at the weight- which we are guaranteed not to get since lil g is fighting so safe in the hopes of getting a big fight with Canelo (who is not necessarily the best middleweight challenge for g).

Wow Pureist, I was joking when I asked you to compare the careers of Floyd and ggg...didn't think you were stupid enough to actually do it.

I'm done. Y'all can circle jerk to triple g highlights, I don't care.

Wow, it seems you were wrong and the imbecile all this time, now crawl away with your tail between your legs sulking

Man, I see another new poster who just so happens to have a writing style and interest in the same subject material that our resident school teacher with multiple accounts has...interesting stuff!

Who was that idiot who always used different colors in every post, seems a lot like him aswell

There may be a hint of Rover as well.

Maybe I'm just pining away for the old days

Either way a troll exposed