Posted: 17 Jun 2005, 06:11
blown up lightweights or old fighter or nit, prior to Ndou they are still sterner tests than what junior has been facing mate.
"Good names but if you look at their records going into the fights, they were shot to bits," Hobson said
search wrote:The fact is, since Witter is too dangerous for Hatton, Hatton fans like J are saying that Witter doesn't "deserve" to fight Hatton. Nevermind that he is British, European and Commonwealth champion, Hattons biggest domestic rival who many think would spark Hatton and who beat Ndou betteer than Cotto or Mitchell did.
Biased garbage. Anybody who says Witter doesn't "deserve" a shot at Hatton is a Hatton nuthugger
Surely knockdowns are part of the game?J wrote:thats debatalbe without the knocdowns Witter would hav l ost, Cotto and mitchell controlled the fight all the way through more or less not just for 4 rounds.
Strange you accuse other people of being biased when your posts themselves are obviously not that neutral either.
MW, I actually disagree. It would set the boxing community buzzing but Witter doesn't have anything like the visibility of Hatton, Benn and Eubank or Lewis and Bruno. This is probably in no small part due to FW and him not being the best of mates. Whilst as a boxing fan I'd love to see this fight Witter's had one decent showing at US / world level and that won't have registered massively.MightyWarrior wrote:Have to admit, while it might not appeal to Showtime, a Hatton/Witter showdown would set the UK buzzing like nothing we've seen since Benn/Eubank - PUT UP OR SHUT UP.
And also have to admit, if I were in FW's position, it's not a fight I'd be looking to make in a hurry either.
Yes I guess that's true - let's hope ITV can swing things round a bitCoconut wrote:MW, I actually disagree. It would set the boxing community buzzing but Witter doesn't have anything like the visibility of Hatton, Benn and Eubank or Lewis and Bruno. This is probably in no small part due to FW and him not being the best of mates. Whilst as a boxing fan I'd love to see this fight Witter's had one decent showing at US / world level and that won't have registered massively.MightyWarrior wrote:Have to admit, while it might not appeal to Showtime, a Hatton/Witter showdown would set the UK buzzing like nothing we've seen since Benn/Eubank - PUT UP OR SHUT UP.
And also have to admit, if I were in FW's position, it's not a fight I'd be looking to make in a hurry either.
A Witter fight would only be made if Hatton was looking for a payday after losing or if Witter managed to get himself a big belt.
The fact is that when Witter fought a true title holder he stank the place out, he then fought 15 opponents of dubious calibre, then beats NDou in a close fight.search wrote:No you said they controlled Ndou throughout. Nice to se you left out the judge who scored the Mitchell ndou fight 115-113. And you take ONE judges scorecard from the Cotto Ndou fight while the other two had it 115-113. I don't think you even saw the Mitchell Ndou fight but Mitchell won it 115-113 at best. The Cotto fight was also 115-113 but clearer for Cotto. Barry mcGuigan had Ndou beating Mitchell and Darke had it a draw I believe. I can't rememeber who it was but Watt or McCrory had Cotto winning 115-113.J wrote:what for fucks sake
can you not converse properly?
I said it was debatable.
Cotto was 117-11 on one of the judges scorecards its open to interpetation as we know. Mitchell was 118-110 on one judge and 117-112 for aonther so fornicate knows what fight you were watching.
Witter did not control the whole fight and towards the latter rounds was getitng a bit of a pasting until he found a beautiful shot that stopped Ndou in his tracks.
Im just saying he didnt command Ndou any better than the other guys.
which is fair enough comment.
Neither of them could knock Ndou down like Witter did and Witter wasn't in as much trouble as Mitchell was and wasn't getting caught late like much more than Cotto was.
You can't even admit that Witter beat Ndou much more convincingly than Cotto or Mitchell did.
What an idiot
N'dou is no better an opponent than Ben Tackie was for Hatton.search wrote:OK.KO Atrist wrote:The fact is that when Witter fought a true title holder he stank the place out, he then fought 15 opponents of dubious calibre, then beats NDou in a close fight.search wrote: No you said they controlled Ndou throughout. Nice to se you left out the judge who scored the Mitchell ndou fight 115-113. And you take ONE judges scorecard from the Cotto Ndou fight while the other two had it 115-113. I don't think you even saw the Mitchell Ndou fight but Mitchell won it 115-113 at best. The Cotto fight was also 115-113 but clearer for Cotto. Barry mcGuigan had Ndou beating Mitchell and Darke had it a draw I believe. I can't rememeber who it was but Watt or McCrory had Cotto winning 115-113.
Neither of them could knock Ndou down like Witter did and Witter wasn't in as much trouble as Mitchell was and wasn't getting caught late like much more than Cotto was.
You can't even admit that Witter beat Ndou much more convincingly than Cotto or Mitchell did.
What an idiot
You are shouting about Witters win over Ndou, but Ndou has NEVER beaten a world class fighter.
On the other hand Hatton has just stopped the NO1 man. Out fought him, out punched him and stopped him.
Hatton is the best in the WORLD mate, he has nothing to prove against Witter.
However, if Witter can pick up a decent title, Hatton may be in a generous mood and give him a shot, so Witter can finally earn a very good payday.
Other than that Witter has done nothing to earn a shot at the real world champion.
You only think he deserves a shot becasue he resides in the same country and you perceive some kind of domestic dispute as to superiority.
The fact is there is no dispute, Hatton is better and Witter could not live with him.
It sounds to me that Witter and his fans a becoming a little bitter and jealous.
Ndou is better than anyone on Hattons record bar Tszyu. Hatton DID beat Tszyu but that doesn't mean he can beat Witter and it certainly doesn't mean he is the best at 140 with the likes of Mayweather, Cotto, Harris, Witter etc.
TO say there is no dispute whether or not Hatton would beat Witter is once again stupid. If you really believe that there is "no dispute", then you are also an idiot. It may be YOUR opinion, but MANY MANY people feel differently.
THe fact that Witter is the hold the British title, the commonwealth title and the european title alone make him a credible opponent. for any lgiht welter. Coupled with his power and win over a credible performer in Ndou mean that he is without doubt a worthy adversary for at 140 pounder.
Hatton would never have got away with the tacitics he used against Tszyu in a USA ring too and don't forget that Tszyu had fought 3 rounds in 2 years and is 36.
How can you say that the BRITISH, EURPOEAN and COMMONWEALTH champion doesn't "deserve" a shot at a man who has, let's be honest, been ducking him for years and who has proved himself as a credible opponent in America.
Check-matesearch wrote:Well then how does Witter not "deserve a shot" then?J wrote:well if ndou qualifies Witter then Tackie qualifies Hatton.
not really hatton has the IBF and linear right to the title and number one postion.liamlion wrote:Check-matesearch wrote:Well then how does Witter not "deserve a shot" then?J wrote:well if ndou qualifies Witter then Tackie qualifies Hatton.
I'm not a idiot, I just know my boxing better than you do.search wrote:OK.KO Atrist wrote:The fact is that when Witter fought a true title holder he stank the place out, he then fought 15 opponents of dubious calibre, then beats NDou in a close fight.search wrote: No you said they controlled Ndou throughout. Nice to se you left out the judge who scored the Mitchell ndou fight 115-113. And you take ONE judges scorecard from the Cotto Ndou fight while the other two had it 115-113. I don't think you even saw the Mitchell Ndou fight but Mitchell won it 115-113 at best. The Cotto fight was also 115-113 but clearer for Cotto. Barry mcGuigan had Ndou beating Mitchell and Darke had it a draw I believe. I can't rememeber who it was but Watt or McCrory had Cotto winning 115-113.
Neither of them could knock Ndou down like Witter did and Witter wasn't in as much trouble as Mitchell was and wasn't getting caught late like much more than Cotto was.
You can't even admit that Witter beat Ndou much more convincingly than Cotto or Mitchell did.
What an idiot
You are shouting about Witters win over Ndou, but Ndou has NEVER beaten a world class fighter.
On the other hand Hatton has just stopped the NO1 man. Out fought him, out punched him and stopped him.
Hatton is the best in the WORLD mate, he has nothing to prove against Witter.
However, if Witter can pick up a decent title, Hatton may be in a generous mood and give him a shot, so Witter can finally earn a very good payday.
Other than that Witter has done nothing to earn a shot at the real world champion.
You only think he deserves a shot becasue he resides in the same country and you perceive some kind of domestic dispute as to superiority.
The fact is there is no dispute, Hatton is better and Witter could not live with him.
It sounds to me that Witter and his fans a becoming a little bitter and jealous.
Ndou is better than anyone on Hattons record bar Tszyu. Hatton DID beat Tszyu but that doesn't mean he can beat Witter and it certainly doesn't mean he is the best at 140 with the likes of Mayweather, Cotto, Harris, Witter etc.
TO say there is no dispute whether or not Hatton would beat Witter is once again stupid. If you really believe that there is "no dispute", then you are also an idiot. It may be YOUR opinion, but MANY MANY people feel differently.
THe fact that Witter is the hold the British title, the commonwealth title and the european title alone make him a credible opponent. for any lgiht welter. Coupled with his power and win over a credible performer in Ndou mean that he is without doubt a worthy adversary for at 140 pounder.
Hatton would never have got away with the tacitics he used against Tszyu in a USA ring too and don't forget that Tszyu had fought 3 rounds in 2 years and is 36.
How can you say that the BRITISH, EURPOEAN and COMMONWEALTH champion doesn't "deserve" a shot at a man who has, let's be honest, been ducking him for years and who has proved himself as a credible opponent in America.