Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
-
iamasadlittleboy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
The Sky guys just say Takashi "Miury" is the WBC champion? Miury? GAH!
And for the record, Miura destroys Smith!
And for the record, Miura destroys Smith!
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
I didn't make it but at least 5 of those have already been out tonight and the rest will follow.digzee wrote:You missed "teak tough"
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
They're so tough.... Really Johnny?! Must "tough" guys dont get stopped in 4 of their 7 losses and in a domestic level fight against a 13-7 guy.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
They've gone for the easiest route in the division in terms of sanctioning bodies. Mikey Garcia would obliterate Smith and so would Uchiyama.iamasadlittleboy wrote:The Sky guys just say Takashi "Miury" is the WBC champion? Miury? GAH!
And for the record, Miura destroys Smith!
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Surprised their going the WBC route to be honest, Mendez with the IBF would be a better option.iamasadlittleboy wrote:The Sky guys just say Takashi "Miury" is the WBC champion? Miury? GAH!
And for the record, Miura destroys Smith!
'The nation is still very much in love with Luke Campbell' Who loves him? I wouldn't care if he got knocked out tonight. Talk like that is why I hate Sky, too much hype, the quicker the Olympians get pasted so we don't have to hear about them the better.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Ah ok sorryexpe wrote:I didn't make it but at least 5 of those have already been out tonight and the rest will follow.digzee wrote:You missed "teak tough"
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13518
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Really? You've only mentioned this 600 times now.columbo wrote:Remember this fella that Smith has just done in 8 rounds was knocked out in 7 by a guy with a 13-7 record in an argentinian super bantamweight title fight last year.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
You're imagining that; he's got more balls than any of us on here and I don't think he'll freeze, I hope he breaks Frochs conk.keithmoonhangover wrote:I can hear Groves' arse going from here.Night night Georgie boy.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
I forgot that Eddie Hearn is immune from criticism from you. If this was a FW card, you'd be slagging it off and you know it.jameswilson wrote:Really? You've only mentioned this 600 times now.columbo wrote:Remember this fella that Smith has just done in 8 rounds was knocked out in 7 by a guy with a 13-7 record in an argentinian super bantamweight title fight last year.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13518
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
columbo wrote:I forgot that Eddie Hearn is immune from criticism from you. If this was a FW card, you'd be slagging it off and you know it.jameswilson wrote:Really? You've only mentioned this 600 times now.columbo wrote:Remember this fella that Smith has just done in 8 rounds was knocked out in 7 by a guy with a 13-7 record in an argentinian super bantamweight title fight last year.
I wouldn't be slagging off the 11th fight down the card. On a allegedly card a fight of the standard of the McDonnell fight would be the chief support. And it's no good giving it the 'ohhhhhh I don't have to pay for that tho!!!' Well you do have to pay don't you.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17228
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
I was joking mate. But he's gonna take a beating tonight mate.palooka wrote:You're imagining that; he's got more balls than any of us on here and I don't think he'll freeze, I hope he breaks Frochs conk.keithmoonhangover wrote:I can hear Groves' arse going from here.Night night Georgie boy.
-
iamasadlittleboy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Wait for Uchiyama v Miura II (sometime next year), then fight for the vacant WBA "regular" or go for Mendez (IBF). Miura is a beast, not on Garcia or Garcia level but tough and a monster puncher himself, "avoid".columbo wrote:They've gone for the easiest route in the division in terms of sanctioning bodies. Mikey Garcia would obliterate Smith and so would Uchiyama.iamasadlittleboy wrote:The Sky guys just say Takashi "Miury" is the WBC champion? Miury? GAH!
And for the record, Miura destroys Smith!
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
columbo wrote:I forgot that Eddie Hearn is immune from criticism from you. If this was a FW card, you'd be slagging it off and you know it.jameswilson wrote:Really? You've only mentioned this 600 times now.columbo wrote:Remember this fella that Smith has just done in 8 rounds was knocked out in 7 by a guy with a 13-7 record in an argentinian super bantamweight title fight last year.
I wouldn't be slagging off the 11th fight down the card. On a allegedly card a fight of the standard of the McDonnell fight would be the chief support. And it's no good giving it the 'ohhhhhh I don't have to pay for that tho!!!' Well you do have to pay don't you.[/quote]
So what's the Co-main event then James?
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Chuck Jones.
That is all.
That is all.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13518
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
The chief support of this bill is the same standard as some of Nathan Cleverly's defences (apart from the Kovalev one obviously.)columbo wrote:
So what's the Co-main event then James?
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
I'm sure you slagged them off aswell. It's a double standard.jameswilson wrote:The chief support of this bill is the same standard as some of Nathan Cleverly's defences (apart from the Kovalev one obviously.)columbo wrote:
So what's the Co-main event then James?
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Kal Yafai sat behind Eddie. Another guy about to be poached I imagine.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Love itrossij8 wrote:Hahahaha that is classexpe wrote:Who wants a game?
Printing it off
'High on the Heed'
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Chuck Jones: 46th best lightweight in Britain.
-
iamasadlittleboy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Poached? By who?columbo wrote:Kal Yafai sat behind Eddie. Another guy about to be poached I imagine.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Who do you think? Last time I checked, he was a Hennessy fighter.iamasadlittleboy wrote:Poached? By who?columbo wrote:Kal Yafai sat behind Eddie. Another guy about to be poached I imagine.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13518
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
I slagged them off because they topped the bill. And I have slagged this particular Quigg fight off too earlier this week in a discussion we both had. It isn't good enough for a chief support, but the point is it is a chief support, not a main event.columbo wrote:I'm sure you slagged them off aswell. It's a double standard.jameswilson wrote:The chief support of this bill is the same standard as some of Nathan Cleverly's defences (apart from the Kovalev one obviously.)columbo wrote:
So what's the Co-main event then James?
-
iamasadlittleboy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Pretty sure Yafai is Matchroom...columbo wrote:Who do you think? Last time I checked, he was a Hennessy fighter.iamasadlittleboy wrote:Poached? By who?columbo wrote:Kal Yafai sat behind Eddie. Another guy about to be poached I imagine.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13518
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
....Don't think so mate. Yafai has been Matchroom for a while.columbo wrote:Who do you think? Last time I checked, he was a Hennessy fighter.iamasadlittleboy wrote:Poached? By who?columbo wrote:Kal Yafai sat behind Eddie. Another guy about to be poached I imagine.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Thinking of Galahad maybe?
