askin v mckenzie

skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by skanksta »

if Tom Baker fills out and gets some power he'll be some fighter..
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23241
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by handsofstone »

skanksta wrote:if Tom Baker fills out and gets some power he'll be some fighter..
He's a tidy boxer but just doesnt have IT I reckon
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23241
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by handsofstone »

This fight needs IJL
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by skanksta »

Baker vs Buglioni would be a great match of styles :box:
Think F Bug. would look outclassed early, but come back to stop Baker late..

IJL :doh:
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by digzee »

I totally forgot this card was on tonight. Is it worth catching the repeat?
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by skanksta »

Watch Mitchell Smith KO and the Ovill fight with your scorecard.
The rest can be deleted.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23241
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by handsofstone »

Not really,the main event was good but the ref spoiled it by allowing persistent fouling by Askin

Miles Shinkwin dismantling Richard Horton was excellent and Mitchell Smith's KO of Antonio Hovatic was brutal but the other 5 fights were tripe
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by skanksta »

Shinkwin was good - a touch of the Froch about his style.
Romeo Romaeo (sp?) was vaguely watchable
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23241
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by handsofstone »

Baker wins 97-94

Good last couple of rounds where Greenwood had his moments but it was effectively a shite fight
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by skanksta »

x2
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by reggaereggae »

skanksta wrote:Shinkwin was good - a touch of the Froch about his style.
Romeo Romaeo (sp?) was vaguely watchable
Does Romaeo look any nearer to getting chinned?? :D
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by digzee »

Thanks everyone :TU:
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

handsofstone wrote:The punches that landed on the back of Askin's head were mainly due to him putting his head down on McKenzie for a cuddle
Defo. How he got away with it for the first 5 rounds is beyond me. Was blatant but effective.

BN commentary calling for a rematch. Eh no thanks.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by Sklar »

Say what you will about the Wlad-tactics, Askin and his strategists have taken home the belts. Well done to them.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by crusader »

Except they didn't, unless the wrong winner was announced.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23241
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by handsofstone »

Sklar wrote:Say what you will about the Wlad-tactics, Askin and his strategists have taken home the belts. Well done to them.
Have you been on the sauce for breakfast Sklar :OhYes:

Na as much as I was frustrated watching Askin spoil, the blame falls mainly on Marcus McDonnell who failed to enforce the rules and allowed Matty to keep fouling,it wasn't just the grappling,he was going in with the head too

Askin boxed well when letting his hands go and I was a bit surprised I had McKenzie winning when I tallied up my card at the end but he(Matty) let that get away from him

As for a rematch, no thanks,Ovill has proved himself domestically and if he can't get a title shot then an eliminator will do
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by Sklar »

:lol: I read through this topic and somehow got the impression Askin had been given the decision. For those who remain in any doubt, I've now officially lost the plot.

Speed reading will get you nowhere.
LancashireLoyal wrote:Well done Matty British n com champ .by a round for me :box: .
Tangerine
Middleweight
Posts: 1306
Joined: 15 Jan 2014, 17:33

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by Tangerine »

:DDD sorry mate I thought it was a certainty that askin was ahead.even mckenzies corner knew he was chasing it.what were the official scores last night?
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by crusader »

116-109
115-111
113-114

I had Ovill edging it.
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1080
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by ScottDetonator »

handsofstone wrote:Not a bad tussle that,I had it 113-112 McKenzie,

Askin boxed well but got the balance wrong in some of the rounds when it came to spoiling and fighting,he'll be feeling like he let it get away but great perseverance from Ovill to claw it back

Matty should have been DQ if I'm honest but the ref let him away with it all night yet was quick to pull up McKenzie, it spoiled the fight

PS-WTF was going on with the scores? Does Mark Burdess not know what MD is and one of the scores was clearly wrong
I had it by about 2 points to McKenzie but I backed him to win by KO so obviously I was biased!

The holding just ruined the fight and when the ref took a point from Orvil I thought it wasn't going to be his night. Managed to get 7/4 in live betting on Orvil just to win the fight around the mid-way stage, so I came out about even.

I don't like to see DQ's but Askin was, well, asking for it :lol:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by Horse »

Can Warren not find someone better than Burdis? He has no talent.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23241
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by handsofstone »

Horse wrote:Can Warren not find someone better than Burdis? He has no talent.
Agreed,hes woeful
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by Old bones Ian »

Look at fights from the 70's and 80's , fat bloke comes out introduced the boxers, told us who the ref was , and then that was it.

For me I blame Buffer, as everyone now tries to copy him, and fail badly
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

ScottDetonator wrote:
handsofstone wrote:Not a bad tussle that,I had it 113-112 McKenzie,

Askin boxed well but got the balance wrong in some of the rounds when it came to spoiling and fighting,he'll be feeling like he let it get away but great perseverance from Ovill to claw it back

Matty should have been DQ if I'm honest but the ref let him away with it all night yet was quick to pull up McKenzie, it spoiled the fight

PS-WTF was going on with the scores? Does Mark Burdess not know what MD is and one of the scores was clearly wrong
I had it by about 2 points to McKenzie but I backed him to win by KO so obviously I was biased!

The holding just ruined the fight and when the ref took a point from Orvil I thought it wasn't going to be his night. Managed to get 7/4 in live betting on Orvil just to win the fight around the mid-way stage, so I came out about even.

I don't like to see DQ's but Askin was, well, asking for it :lol:
Same as I got 17/10 about round 7 or 8 on Ovil. My banker was Ovil KO/TKO/DQ I was screaming for the DQ :lol:
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: askin v mckenzie

Post by Andrew »

Horse wrote:Can Warren not find someone better than Burdis? He has no talent.
Should be Michael Pass or the Scottish guy who has done the Frampton fights can't remember his name though.
Post Reply