Page 6 of 6
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 20 Apr 2015, 11:20
by Switch hitter
manno wrote:mercman wrote:Pete Gabbitus.

superb boxer pete.
Boxed him in his 2nd to last fight....you could see how people talked highly of him
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 01 Oct 2021, 13:15
by margaret thatcher
petar lesov
olympic and euro champ amateur, 1-5 pro with all losses by ko and only win over a guy making his debut
https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/88858
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 01 Oct 2021, 14:53
by Noxy
There was someone called Hyland, I think he was from Liverpool. Hardy stopped him.
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 01 Oct 2021, 15:24
by bigjack
Noxy wrote: ↑01 Oct 2021, 14:53
There was someone called Hyland, I think he was from Liverpool. Hardy stopped him.
John Hyland
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 01 Oct 2021, 15:37
by mickey1975
bigjack wrote: ↑01 Oct 2021, 15:24
Noxy wrote: ↑01 Oct 2021, 14:53
There was someone called Hyland, I think he was from Liverpool. Hardy stopped him.
John Hyland
Big player in MTK
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 05 Oct 2021, 16:54
by Butti99
Fred Evans
Bradley Saunders
Errol Christie
Micheal MCGuire
Antony ogogo
Frankie Gavin
Tom stalker
The list goes on
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 05 Oct 2021, 18:18
by JamesPhilips
Butti99 wrote: ↑05 Oct 2021, 16:54
Fred Evans
Bradley Saunders
Errol Christie
Micheal MCGuire
Antony ogogo
Frankie Gavin
Tom stalker
The list goes on
Audley Harrison
George Collins
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 06 Oct 2021, 01:42
by bennie
mickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2021, 15:37
bigjack wrote: ↑01 Oct 2021, 15:24
Noxy wrote: ↑01 Oct 2021, 14:53
There was someone called Hyland, I think he was from Liverpool. Hardy stopped him.
John Hyland
Big player in MTK
Hyland had stopped Billy Hardy in the amateurs but Hardy destroyed him in the pros.
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 06 Oct 2021, 01:54
by bennie
I was looking at Dudley McKenzie's amateur record yesterday. Dudley, a southpaw and the brother of Duke and Clinton, won four national schoolboy titles, two junior ABA titles and two NABC titles. He was one NABC title away from the full set as a schoolboy and junior and stands shoulder to shoulder with George Collins, who also failed to win a third NABC title when he was bombed out by Gary Stretch. Errol Christie did get the full set, of course, including an ABA senior title at the first attempt in 1981. (McKenzie and Collins didn't win an ABA senior title.)
Dudley turned pro with Gary Davidson and racked up five or six straight wins but was then outscored by James Cook and never boxed again.
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 25 Dec 2022, 18:28
by wrighty
freddydoesdallas wrote: ↑08 Apr 2015, 09:30
I'll mention the elephant in the room...
Lomachenko - 396-1 as an amatuer, already 3-1 as a pro
This aged like milk

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 26 Dec 2022, 13:37
by Kit
Istvan Szucs, English ABA champion and had beaten olympic gold medalist Clemente Russo.
But as a pro 4-16-1
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 26 Dec 2022, 14:48
by Verdi
Majidov could be headed down this path.
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 26 Dec 2022, 14:54
by wrighty
Kit wrote: ↑26 Dec 2022, 13:37
Istvan Szucs, English ABA champion and had beaten olympic gold medalist Clemente Russo.
But as a pro 4-16-1
How the fornicate did he manage that?!
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 26 Dec 2022, 15:32
by Coco
wrighty wrote: ↑26 Dec 2022, 14:54
Kit wrote: ↑26 Dec 2022, 13:37
Istvan Szucs, English ABA champion and had beaten olympic gold medalist Clemente Russo.
But as a pro 4-16-1
How the fornicate did he manage that?!
It's almost like it's not as easy as it looks!
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 26 Dec 2022, 18:18
by margaret thatcher
maybe it was easier to make money being the losing side. maybe his personal life was a mess or something, but something defo is funky there. obviously the ams aint the pros, but you have to have some notable ability to achieve what he did - i notice he also won euro bronze and had other decent results internationally
that takes much more ability than you'd expect from a guy losing to 4-15, 0-1, type of pro opponents. the other guys usually mentioned in these threads underperformed, but generally had winning records or showed some quality in losses. not this guy
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 26 Dec 2022, 19:05
by dookus
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑26 Dec 2022, 18:18
maybe it was easier to make money being the losing side. maybe his personal life was a mess or something, but something defo is funky there. obviously the ams aint the pros, but you have to have some notable ability to achieve what he did - i notice he also won euro bronze and had other decent results internationally
that takes much more ability than you'd expect from a guy losing to 4-15, 0-1, type of pro opponents. the other guys usually mentioned in these threads underperformed, but generally had winning records or showed some quality in losses. not this guy
Yeah, I was also confused by his record. It's not like he started out on the A side and decided to become a journeyman, he started out bad and mostly stayed that way.
I notice he got stopped a lot - maybe the amateur game suited a weak chin?
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 26 Dec 2022, 19:31
by wrighty
Coco wrote: ↑26 Dec 2022, 15:32
wrighty wrote: ↑26 Dec 2022, 14:54
Kit wrote: ↑26 Dec 2022, 13:37
Istvan Szucs, English ABA champion and had beaten olympic gold medalist Clemente Russo.
But as a pro 4-16-1
How the fornicate did he manage that?!
It's almost like it's not as easy as it looks!
I get that but the fact he's beating quality like Russo and winning the Abas shows he has ability and can fight. He would have been fighting top amateurs.
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 27 Dec 2022, 06:50
by Kit
I remember people talking about Szucs in the amateurs saying how he was absolutely brutal and ruthless to the body. It is such a polar opposite in terms of levels of opposition and performances that I’d say it’s more likely that Boxrec have mixed up two different Istvans Szucs as the same person.
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 27 Dec 2022, 06:54
by Coco
Kit wrote: ↑27 Dec 2022, 06:50
I remember people talking about Szucs in the amateurs saying how he was absolutely brutal and ruthless to the body. It is such a polar opposite in terms of levels of opposition and performances that I’d say it’s more likely that Boxrec have mixed up two different Istvans Szucs as the same person.
Also there is a gap between being amateur and turning pro.
Age is the biggest hurdle!
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 27 Dec 2022, 09:20
by dookus
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 27 Dec 2022, 19:56
by wrighty
Danny Price was very good but I think he struggled getting fights and with injuries. 2 aba titles and a win over Bellew.
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 27 Dec 2022, 22:27
by HomicideHenry
Clay Hodges... the man defeated George Foreman in the amateurs three times, but basically went nowhere as a professional. Many years later he would play Jess Willard in the movie Dempsey. Ironically as a professional he did win a decision over Jimmy Young even though it was basically Young's third fight as a pro.
Ever want to stump people with a boxing trivia question ask them if they can name a heavyweight who beat both George Foreman and Jimmy Young who was also an actor.
Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT
Posted: 28 Dec 2022, 03:19
by mickey1975
wrighty wrote: ↑27 Dec 2022, 19:56
Danny Price was very good but I think he struggled getting fights and with injuries. 2 aba titles and a win over Bellew.
Scarborough had a very good squad for a small North Yorkshire town for a few years.