Page 6 of 13
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 16:50
by Neil Gee
I make it 4-2 Starkey without the two ridiculous point deductions. With them I make it a draw.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 16:51
by Stuffs
Felt Starkey should have had one off for holding but two was harsh. Ultimately though, let's just be glad it's over.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 16:52
by rossij8
Without the ridiculous point reductions, should have been a draw
Poor referee
Feel tired after that
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 16:53
by Matt Teague
I wonder who that referee wanted to win
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 16:55
by BitPlayer
Stuffs wrote:Felt Starkey should have had one off for holding but two was harsh. Ultimately though, let's just be glad it's over.
But he didn't even properly warn him for it.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 16:58
by Neil Gee
rossij8 wrote:Without the ridiculous point reductions, should have been a draw
Poor referee
Feel tired after that
Snap!
The ref had McGoldrick a mile ahead anyway. He only gave Starkey one round. It's not like he needed to make any deductions to help the favourite along.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:08
by rossij8
Come on Haskins, fields need to be ploughed tomorrow, so make it an easy night!
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:12
by handsofstone
rossij8 wrote:Come on Haskins, fields need to be ploughed tomorrow, so make it an easy night!
"GET OFF MY LAND"
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:12
by Boxing Prospect
One of the most respected referees in the world? hahahahahahaha
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:13
by SaadOffTheDeck
I only saw Burnett once, liked his body work. Cheering for him.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:13
by rossij8
handsofstone wrote:rossij8 wrote:Come on Haskins, fields need to be ploughed tomorrow, so make it an easy night!
"GET OFF MY LAND"

Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:13
by chiggsy
RYAN RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRNEEEEEEEEEEHHHHHHHH
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:14
by dookus
"The playboy"?
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:15
by boxingknockout
dookus wrote:"The playboy"?
The 5ft1 100 pound playboy who's never had a girlfriend apart from his wife

Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:18
by Horse
10-9 Haskins
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:18
by Neil Gee
I can't split them in the first, just feeling each other out.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:19
by Tarkus
Burnett has Booth style written all over him. Nice little fighter.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:21
by ProMayhem
Bad cut that
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:22
by Tarkus
Burnett 2-0.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:22
by Horse
19-19 Even
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:23
by Neil Gee
Damn cuts! I give Haskins second.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:25
by rossij8
The home crowd could play a part with scoring
You notice this more when you are supporting a fighter
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:26
by robster
The judge with the grey hair & glasses wasn't even watching the fight there, he was studying some papers

Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:27
by Horse
29-29 Even
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 17:30
by skanksta
I like Coldwell's comms - he picked up RB getting his range on his right lead straight away, (while I was giving the first to Haskins

)
I got RB 39-37.
Burnett got this unless he walks in to one, looks bigger, slightly faster and setting a pace that LH will struggle with.
Add in home advantage, he looks home and hosed.