Page 6 of 9
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 01 Jan 2018, 21:09
by Taansend
coneye wrote: ↑01 Jan 2018, 21:05
O hARA HAS been victimized , Ok he's thick , OK he's a dick , OK he made stupid comments which infuriated , people who love to play the victim card ,
But when his promotor turns on him because it was'nt popular with other scouse fighters , it shows the real dick is Hearn ,
When the buildup for Haye -bELLOW COMES AROUND AND bELLOW RANTS HE'S GONNA KILL hAYE , SMASH HIM TO PEICES and murdeerr him . If that upsets Londoners will Hearn pull the fight , don't think so .
Warren is gonna love this display of disloyalty Hearn has shown , Hearn repeatidly says boxers have to be marketed , they have to use social media , ect ect ect , then when they try and being a bit thick it backfires , he does this what a fookwit Hearn is , and personaly i said it before for me i would bet Bellow is behind it all , putting his foot down and demanding he's off the card , and when it comes to talking shite Bellow is one of the worst

Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 00:36
by Deserter
dirk2686 wrote: ↑01 Jan 2018, 09:58
mickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Jan 2018, 09:45
dirk2686 wrote: ↑01 Jan 2018, 08:13
Mick - the issue you have to realise is this. In a question about demographics who would you believe? The actual, official census, or a bloke who's been to Bradford?
Me. Absolutely no way is Bradford even half white.
Next week, Mick corrects someone who suggests America has a population of more than 200m.
"Honestly, I was in South Dakota and barely saw a soul."
In a bid to find some common ground, this article does show that the demographics in significant parts of central Bradford are different to the overall picture depicted by the census:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... llel-lives
Ultimately surely not worth arguing over though?
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 01:57
by mickey1975
Deserter wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 00:36
dirk2686 wrote: ↑01 Jan 2018, 09:58
mickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Jan 2018, 09:45
Me. Absolutely no way is Bradford even half white.
Next week, Mick corrects someone who suggests America has a population of more than 200m.
"Honestly, I was in South Dakota and barely saw a soul."
In a bid to find some common ground, this article does show that the demographics in significant parts of central Bradford are different to the overall picture depicted by the census:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... llel-lives
Ultimately surely not worth arguing over though?
I'm dealing in facts. I've got eyes. Absolutely nowhere near 50% white.
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 02:33
by Wales
UrbanFox wrote: ↑01 Jan 2018, 10:52
PredatorHayds wrote: ↑01 Jan 2018, 10:29
Ohara is easy to dislike and Taylor showed him up. But he’s said far worse things than threatening to do a interview with a paper.
Reverse the roles and imagine that Tommy Coyle had abused Davies based on his origins or his ethnicity. There would be outraged and his licence would have been revoked.
I’m not 100% up to speed on this . But Davies never abused Coyle on his origins or ethnicity, or did he?
Flipping it on its head would be like Davies openly tweeting his disliking of the Daily Mail and Coyle saying
“I want the daily Mail ringside for my fight. Ill wear the daily mail logo and they’ll work with Eddie to promote my fights one day”
As a side - it’s not so long ago Sky and Matchroom paid a 6 figure sum to the Sub to make a video on Carl Froch to help PROMOTE his fight!
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 02:39
by Wales
its only couple weeks ago Hearn publically said he wanted to work with Fury.
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 04:19
by dirk2686
Deserter wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 00:36
dirk2686 wrote: ↑01 Jan 2018, 09:58
mickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Jan 2018, 09:45
Me. Absolutely no way is Bradford even half white.
Next week, Mick corrects someone who suggests America has a population of more than 200m.
"Honestly, I was in South Dakota and barely saw a soul."
In a bid to find some common ground, this article does show that the demographics in significant parts of central Bradford are different to the overall picture depicted by the census:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... llel-lives
Ultimately surely not worth arguing over though?
Oh I agree it's a daft argument. But when Mick gets upset about something it's amusing to see that rather than say he was mistaken, he is in fact correct because one of his mates in the drying out shelter told him so and that's good enough.
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 04:21
by dirk2686
mickey1975 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 01:57
Deserter wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 00:36
dirk2686 wrote: ↑01 Jan 2018, 09:58
Next week, Mick corrects someone who suggests America has a population of more than 200m.
"Honestly, I was in South Dakota and barely saw a soul."
In a bid to find some common ground, this article does show that the demographics in significant parts of central Bradford are different to the overall picture depicted by the census:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... llel-lives
Ultimately surely not worth arguing over though?
I'm dealing in facts. I've got eyes. Absolutely nowhere near 50% white.
Mick - are you sure you're not basing this on you going for a curry?
'I was there with my two best mates - Jack Daniels and Johnnie Walker, and seriously, everyone else was Asian. I've got eyes. I know what I saw.'
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 05:58
by lurkyshaka
The more this rumbles on the more this looks increasinlgy ridiculous....
Davies says to a lad from Hull that he'll give an interview with the Sun.....and people think he's mocking Hillsborough?? FFS...the connection is flimsy at best, but in truth its utterly ludicrous.
Unless there is more to it that none of us know about, then this situation is grossly unfair on Davies and the way that Eddie has thrown Davies under the bus will do Matchroom no favours. I'd like to hear an interview with Eddie regarding this. And not a PR based one that avoids asking the real questions. I'd like to hear this addressed properly.
And now its been said that Davies comments were in fact aimed at an apparent burglary that Coyle was in some way implicated in. I suppose Coyle doesn't owe Davies anything, but its not very honourable allowing Davies to be blamed for something entirely different, and especially a subject as controversial and sensitive as Hillsborough.
If Davies was referring to Hillsborough, then he's obviously a c***, BUT I think its growing clearer by the second that he wasn't. The way that some people have turned on him is disgusting. He needs to seek legal advice to address this issue and then he needs to go about setting up a new team to handle his career.
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 06:09
by Lenny Cravats
dirk2686 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 04:21
mickey1975 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 01:57
Deserter wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 00:36
In a bid to find some common ground, this article does show that the demographics in significant parts of central Bradford are different to the overall picture depicted by the census:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... llel-lives
Ultimately surely not worth arguing over though?
I'm dealing in facts. I've got eyes. Absolutely nowhere near 50% white.
Mick - are you sure you're not basing this on you going for a curry?
'I was there with my two best mates - Jack Daniels and Johnnie Walker, and seriously, everyone else was Asian. I've got eyes. I know what I saw.'
I lived in Bradford for a year. I imagine that the Bradford postcode is probably over 50% white, but Bradford central absolutely no way.
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 06:10
by Lenny Cravats
Oh and whoever started off the Bradford thing, it isn’t called Bradistan anymore. It’s called Islamabrad.
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 06:13
by mickey1975
Lenny Cravats wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 06:09
dirk2686 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 04:21
mickey1975 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 01:57
I'm dealing in facts. I've got eyes. Absolutely nowhere near 50% white.
Mick - are you sure you're not basing this on you going for a curry?
'I was there with my two best mates - Jack Daniels and Johnnie Walker, and seriously, everyone else was Asian. I've got eyes. I know what I saw.'
I lived in Bradford for a year. I imagine that the Bradford postcode is probably over 50% white, but Bradford central absolutely no way.
Don't tell Dirk, I see things because I'm a drunk. I only go to curry houses there.
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 06:13
by mickey1975
Lenny Cravats wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 06:09
dirk2686 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 04:21
mickey1975 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 01:57
I'm dealing in facts. I've got eyes. Absolutely nowhere near 50% white.
Mick - are you sure you're not basing this on you going for a curry?
'I was there with my two best mates - Jack Daniels and Johnnie Walker, and seriously, everyone else was Asian. I've got eyes. I know what I saw.'
I lived in Bradford for a year. I imagine that the Bradford postcode is probably over 50% white, but Bradford central absolutely no way.
Don't tell Dirk, I see things because I'm a drunk. I only go to curry houses there.
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 06:18
by dirk2686
Lenny Cravats wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 06:09I lived in Bradford for a year. I imagine that the Bradford postcode is probably over 50% white, but Bradford central absolutely no way.
Well yeah - there are going to be parts of it that are more Asian than others. Our resident expert knows this isn't the case though due to his eyes being more correct than the census.
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 06:20
by banjo
I'll believe the census and it's Bradford not Inner Bradford
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 06:20
by Nightmare Roy
dirk2686 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 06:18
Lenny Cravats wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 06:09I lived in Bradford for a year. I imagine that the Bradford postcode is probably over 50% white, but Bradford central absolutely no way.
Well yeah - there are going to be parts of it that are more Asian than others. Our resident expert knows this isn't the case though due to his eyes being more correct than the census.
If you google ethnicity in Bradford it's says it's 67% white British
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 06:30
by mickey1975
Two comments on the bounce about my drinking.... Sorry, you're right, Bradford is all white, I sit drinking meths all day and Tyson fury is useless and if Wlad had tried, wouldn't have lasted a round! Meanwhile, I live in the real world.
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 06:32
by Lenny Cravats
Yeah but that’s the Bradford postcode. The white areas are the North of Bradford And surrounding, more rural areas. Those areas are huge in comparison to central, or what you’d actually call Bradford. If you’re in Bingley, you say Bingley, not Bradford. The central areas, that you call ‘Bradford’ are predominantly Asian.
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 06:48
by orbtastic
I've family in Saltaire and Baildon, they are really white areas. They were head teachers, I remember in the early 80s they were taking Urdu lessons.
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 06:51
by dirk2686
mickey1975 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 06:30
Two comments on the bounce about my drinking.... Sorry, you're right, Bradford is all white, I sit drinking meths all day and Tyson fury is useless and if Wlad had tried, wouldn't have lasted a round! Meanwhile, I live in the real world.
You live in a fantasy world mate. You're genuinely telling people the census is wrong and your reasoning is 'I've been to Bradford.' Have a word ffs.

Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 06:58
by mickey1975
Lenny Cravats wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 06:32
Yeah but that’s the Bradford postcode. The white areas are the North of Bradford And surrounding, more rural areas. Those areas are huge in comparison to central, or what you’d actually call Bradford. If you’re in Bingley, you say Bingley, not Bradford. The central areas, that you call ‘Bradford’ are predominantly Asian.
Don't tell Dirk. You've only lived there.
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 07:00
by mickey1975
dirk2686 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 06:51
mickey1975 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 06:30
Two comments on the bounce about my drinking.... Sorry, you're right, Bradford is all white, I sit drinking meths all day and Tyson fury is useless and if Wlad had tried, wouldn't have lasted a round! Meanwhile, I live in the real world.
You live in a fantasy world mate. You're genuinely telling people the census is wrong and your reasoning is 'I've been to Bradford.' Have a word ffs.
Go there at least weekly. The other posters are correct, a lot of the postcode areas are indeed very white. Central Bradford? You're joking. Or probably not, as a quick Google search makes you an expert....
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 07:03
by dirk2686
mickey1975 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 06:58
Lenny Cravats wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 06:32
Yeah but that’s the Bradford postcode. The white areas are the North of Bradford And surrounding, more rural areas. Those areas are huge in comparison to central, or what you’d actually call Bradford. If you’re in Bingley, you say Bingley, not Bradford. The central areas, that you call ‘Bradford’ are predominantly Asian.
Don't tell Dirk. You've only lived there.
'I went to New York once. Bensonhurst. I'm telling you, and people don't believe me when I say this but I swear down. The USA is 90% Italian. Don't believe me? I've got eyes you mug.'
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 07:08
by mickey1975
I'm not even arguing. You're beyond reasoning with. Get from behind your keyboard and see! Scarborough has a York postcode but is 40 miles away! Wetherby has a Leeds one and is nowhere near it. Don't believe the Internet entirely, mate, local knowledge is worth a lot more.
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 07:44
by TheGman
banjo wrote: ↑01 Jan 2018, 15:07
Loftgroov wrote: ↑01 Jan 2018, 14:34
Storm in a teacup.
I've never understood why any comment on Hillborough, a terrible tragedy, is taken to be an affront to the whole city of Liverpool. It like when Ken Bigley met a grissly end, it must have been horrific for his family, but we had "the whole city of Liverpool in mourning"......
When Bradford's ground burnt down 56 people died yet in contrast to Hillborough when is it ever even mentioned?
Horrible things happen all over the country sadly but Liverpudlians do seem to revel in victimhood.
The police, government and the media didn't blame the fans for Valley Parade, they did for Hillsborough. They fucked up and then lied and made up stories that were proven to be false and the only people who pickpocketed the dead on that day were South Yorkshire police officers.
Thanks babjo,i was about to write an S A as to why Hillsborough is different to bradford and you have hit the nail on the head. What gets me is that people from outside of Liverpool or LFC say the same things "Liverpudlians play the badly done to card and wallow is self pity" well please someone tell me how long they would take to clear a dead family members name that had been dragged through the mud? By the sounds of most non scousers they wouldnt fight that long to clear any family members name which is sad. Anne williams died still fighting to clear her sons name after nearly 30 years thats hiw long a parent from liverpool fights to clear a name Margaret Thatcher,the south yorkshire police and the F.A hid the truth and the scum printed lies about the fans that were doing the job the police and ambulance service should of been doing,dont slate them praise them for sticking with it while greaving for a lost loved one or a lost friend.
Bradford was a disaster but it wasnt a lie
Re: Ohara Davies
Posted: 02 Jan 2018, 08:01
by banjo
thechump wrote: ↑02 Jan 2018, 07:44
banjo wrote: ↑01 Jan 2018, 15:07
Loftgroov wrote: ↑01 Jan 2018, 14:34
Storm in a teacup.
I've never understood why any comment on Hillborough, a terrible tragedy, is taken to be an affront to the whole city of Liverpool. It like when Ken Bigley met a grissly end, it must have been horrific for his family, but we had "the whole city of Liverpool in mourning"......
When Bradford's ground burnt down 56 people died yet in contrast to Hillborough when is it ever even mentioned?
Horrible things happen all over the country sadly but Liverpudlians do seem to revel in victimhood.
The police, government and the media didn't blame the fans for Valley Parade, they did for Hillsborough. They fucked up and then lied and made up stories that were proven to be false and the only people who pickpocketed the dead on that day were South Yorkshire police officers.
Thanks babjo,i was about to write an S A as to why Hillsborough is different to bradford and you have hit the nail on the head. What gets me is that people from outside of Liverpool or LFC say the same things "Liverpudlians play the badly done to card and wallow is self pity" well please someone tell me how long they would take to clear a dead family members name that had been dragged through the mud? By the sounds of most non scousers they wouldnt fight that long to clear any family members name which is sad. Anne williams died still fighting to clear her sons name after nearly 30 years thats hiw long a parent from liverpool fights to clear a name Margaret Thatcher,the south yorkshire police and the F.A hid the truth and the scum printed lies about the fans that were doing the job the police and ambulance service should of been doing,dont slate them praise them for sticking with it while greaving for a lost loved one or a lost friend.
Bradford was a disaster but it wasnt a lie
I disagree, if this had happened to any other club their people would be fighting just as hard for the same, but because it's never happened to them they just think Liverpool fans were milking it. I suppose they think the families of the Bloody Sunday victims were milking it too and they took even longer to get an apology for something even worse.