Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46317
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by gilgamesh »

ivanking wrote: 29 Jul 2020, 11:05
gilgamesh wrote: 29 Jul 2020, 10:32
ivanking wrote: 29 Jul 2020, 10:25 Do you guys want to see this fight? Frankly, I don't think we can expect quality boxing, but somebody can get badly hurt.
They'd have to actually be trying to hurt each other to hurt each other. They're gonna have a nice friendly sparring sessions, and laugh all the way to the bank at the suckers who were willing to pay for it.
What if old Mike wakes up?
Did you ever see his Exhibition match with Corey "T-Rex" Sanders?

That's what this is gonna be.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101108
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Fight is gonna be postponed
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by Enlightened-One »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 04:26 Fight is gonna be postponed
Team Tyson apparently asked for the event to be postponed.

And I don’t want to speculate, but the timing of this announcement seems rather coincidental with last week’s CSAC’s discussions with VADA for PED testing.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by oogiebe »

Enlightened-One wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 05:22
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 04:26 Fight is gonna be postponed
Team Tyson apparently asked for the event to be postponed.

And I don’t want to speculate, but the timing of this announcement seems rather coincidental with last week’s CSAC’s discussions with VADA for PED testing.
Nope. According to ESPN, "The source confirmed that the organizers of this event needed more time to secure international television deals and tie up loose ends in regards to the pay-per-view."
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by Enlightened-One »

oogiebe wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 12:21
Enlightened-One wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 05:22
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 04:26 Fight is gonna be postponed
Team Tyson apparently asked for the event to be postponed.

And I don’t want to speculate, but the timing of this announcement seems rather coincidental with last week’s CSAC’s discussions with VADA for PED testing.
Nope. According to ESPN, "The source confirmed that the organizers of this event needed more time to secure international television deals and tie up loose ends in regards to the pay-per-view."
Nope. I didn’t make it up, read the article for yourself.

https://metro.co.uk/2020/08/10/why-mike ... wsnow-feed

Mike Tyson’s Legends Only League is a sports league created and owned by Mike Tyson and Eros Innovations.

So if Mike Tyson is one of the owners responsible for organising the bout, then his team chose to delay the exhibition.

And what did I originally claim?
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by oogiebe »

Enlightened-One wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 14:28
oogiebe wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 12:21
Enlightened-One wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 05:22
Team Tyson apparently asked for the event to be postponed.

And I don’t want to speculate, but the timing of this announcement seems rather coincidental with last week’s CSAC’s discussions with VADA for PED testing.
Nope. According to ESPN, "The source confirmed that the organizers of this event needed more time to secure international television deals and tie up loose ends in regards to the pay-per-view."
Nope. I didn’t make it up, read the article for yourself.

https://metro.co.uk/2020/08/10/why-mike ... wsnow-feed

Mike Tyson’s Legends Only League is a sports league created and owned by Mike Tyson and Eros Innovations.

So if Mike Tyson is one of the owners responsible for organising the bout, then his team chose to delay the exhibition.

And what did I originally claim?
Your 'speculation' seems to be just that. Still playing your lying games, eh?
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101108
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Enlightened-One wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 14:28
oogiebe wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 12:21
Enlightened-One wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 05:22
Team Tyson apparently asked for the event to be postponed.

And I don’t want to speculate, but the timing of this announcement seems rather coincidental with last week’s CSAC’s discussions with VADA for PED testing.
Nope. According to ESPN, "The source confirmed that the organizers of this event needed more time to secure international television deals and tie up loose ends in regards to the pay-per-view."
Nope. I didn’t make it up, read the article for yourself.

https://metro.co.uk/2020/08/10/why-mike ... wsnow-feed

Mike Tyson’s Legends Only League is a sports league created and owned by Mike Tyson and Eros Innovations.

So if Mike Tyson is one of the owners responsible for organising the bout, then his team chose to delay the exhibition.

And what did I originally claim?
Come one.. could be a few things..

But ESPN is a better source for American news than Metro, Express, Mirror.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by bigjack »

oogiebe wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 14:48
Enlightened-One wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 14:28
oogiebe wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 12:21
Nope. According to ESPN, "The source confirmed that the organizers of this event needed more time to secure international television deals and tie up loose ends in regards to the pay-per-view."
Nope. I didn’t make it up, read the article for yourself.

https://metro.co.uk/2020/08/10/why-mike ... wsnow-feed

Mike Tyson’s Legends Only League is a sports league created and owned by Mike Tyson and Eros Innovations.

So if Mike Tyson is one of the owners responsible for organising the bout, then his team chose to delay the exhibition.

And what did I originally claim?
Your 'speculation' seems to be just that. Still playing your lying games, eh?
Oh no,here we go again :lol:
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by Onetimeonly »

It won't make a dime. Cancel it.
The Gratest
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6495
Joined: 20 Jun 2020, 19:41

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by The Gratest »

What? Then years from now we'll have to listen to claims that Iron Mike avoided RJJ because Iron Mike was a dirty drugs cheat??
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by Enlightened-One »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 15:08
Enlightened-One wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 14:28
oogiebe wrote: 10 Aug 2020, 12:21
Nope. According to ESPN, "The source confirmed that the organizers of this event needed more time to secure international television deals and tie up loose ends in regards to the pay-per-view."
Nope. I didn’t make it up, read the article for yourself.

https://metro.co.uk/2020/08/10/why-mike ... wsnow-feed

Mike Tyson’s Legends Only League is a sports league created and owned by Mike Tyson and Eros Innovations.

So if Mike Tyson is one of the owners responsible for organising the bout, then his team chose to delay the exhibition.

And what did I originally claim?
Come one.. could be a few things..

But ESPN is a better source for American news than Metro, Express, Mirror.
Let’s rewind.

We agree that Tyson’s team, the organisers of the event and also the owners of the Legends Only League, delayed the exhibition, which means that the Metro and ESPN are reporting the same story.

If you’d read my post that you quoted, you would have realised this.

I can also provide more articles confirming Tyson’s desire to delay the bout (i.e. Fox Sports and The RING).

We also agree that last week the CSAC were having talks with VADA, after the media raised concerns about the lack of testing.

We also agree that Mike Tyson previously boasted that he burns through $40,000 of weed at his ranch every month.

So we only disagree about something I openly admitted was mere speculation, whereby you don’t believe that Mike Tyson (the owner of a cannabis empire that has also undergone a drastic physical transformation) would have decided to delay the bout due to fears of testing positive for banned substances (i.e. recreational drugs or PED’s).

Would you agree that’s a fair summary of the situation? :TU:
Tevfik1907
Featherweight
Posts: 243
Joined: 08 Mar 2020, 17:53

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by Tevfik1907 »

Imagine if this goes like :lol:


Then he takes Conor too :bag:

chinarich
Middleweight
Posts: 6865
Joined: 29 Dec 2013, 13:20

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by chinarich »

The only drug testing that should happen is for anyone who decides to buy this farce...
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by oogiebe »

chinarich wrote: 11 Aug 2020, 10:23 The only drug testing that should happen is for anyone who decides to buy this farce...
:lol: Seriously yes.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by Enlightened-One »

chinarich wrote: 11 Aug 2020, 10:23 The only drug testing that should happen is for anyone who decides to buy this farce...
Yes. I completely agree! Those that pay to watch this money-making circus event, cannot be mentally competent :TU:

However, the fighters (for safety reasons) need to be tested by VADA.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101108
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Roy Jones to insure his ears.. you know.. just in case.
Tevfik1907
Featherweight
Posts: 243
Joined: 08 Mar 2020, 17:53

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by Tevfik1907 »

Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101108
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

I’ve had to cancel other stuff to be out here, it’s upset my calendar, I’ve got to change things,” Jones Jr told the Daily Mail.

“That’s why we have to table bulls**t now. That’s the biggest issue, I’m not a full time boxer anymore so I do other things to make an income. If I can’t do other things then I should be compensated for that, because it changes the schematics. It’s not acceptable.”

“We’re trying to figure something out, my lawyers is (sic) talking with their lawyers, trying to figure out ways to make it a better situation so that I can compensated for it, that is more beneficial for me to do.”

“If they don’t make it make sense, it (the fight) would be off,”
He added.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9007
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by Syntax Error »

This 'fight' isn't happening.

Jones is probably being used as a foil to add some weird sort of prestige to proceedings until he eventually withdraws and Tyson ends up fighting his valet or maybe Homer Simpson or similar.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by Enlightened-One »

Jones Jr. would have left his calendar blank whilst prepping for an exhibition that was postponed due to a commercial decision made by Team Tyson. One party is at fault for the postponement, since it was due to a premeditated decision.

So it seems entirely reasonable for Roy to be compensated for any wasted training expenses and any lost income due to the postponement of the 12th September event.

And it’s also sensible for Roy to renegotiate new and improved terms for the revised date, due to the event generating more revenue than it would have done if it had been held on the 12th September, coupled with Jones Jr. having to cancel any existing plans that he would have earned income from, as well having to fork out additional training expenses.

Team Tyson postponed the event. And their decision cost Roy Jones Jr. money. So it’s only reasonable for them to reimburse him accordingly and also renegotiate improved terms for the revised exhibition date.

Team Tyson would have definitely appreciated the consequences of their decision to postpone the event, and they would have already anticipated the need to provide Roy with a revised and improved offer catering for the change in schedule.

I really don’t see any problem about the latest developments, because what’s being said is common sense business practice that most people would consider the norm.
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10939
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th

Post by ILikeBeer »

Syntax Error wrote: 19 Aug 2020, 06:31 This 'fight' isn't happening.

Jones is probably being used as a foil to add some weird sort of prestige to proceedings until he eventually withdraws and Tyson ends up fighting his valet or maybe Homer Simpson or similar.
Homer Simpson or similar? So somebody else fictitious?
Post Reply