ivanking wrote: ↑29 Jul 2020, 10:25
Do you guys want to see this fight? Frankly, I don't think we can expect quality boxing, but somebody can get badly hurt.
They'd have to actually be trying to hurt each other to hurt each other. They're gonna have a nice friendly sparring sessions, and laugh all the way to the bank at the suckers who were willing to pay for it.
What if old Mike wakes up?
Did you ever see his Exhibition match with Corey "T-Rex" Sanders?
That's what this is gonna be.
Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th
Posted: 10 Aug 2020, 04:26
by Ruthless-RKO
Fight is gonna be postponed
Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th
Posted: 10 Aug 2020, 05:22
by Enlightened-One
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑10 Aug 2020, 04:26
Fight is gonna be postponed
Team Tyson apparently asked for the event to be postponed.
And I don’t want to speculate, but the timing of this announcement seems rather coincidental with last week’s CSAC’s discussions with VADA for PED testing.
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑10 Aug 2020, 04:26
Fight is gonna be postponed
Team Tyson apparently asked for the event to be postponed.
And I don’t want to speculate, but the timing of this announcement seems rather coincidental with last week’s CSAC’s discussions with VADA for PED testing.
Nope. According to ESPN, "The source confirmed that the organizers of this event needed more time to secure international television deals and tie up loose ends in regards to the pay-per-view."
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑10 Aug 2020, 04:26
Fight is gonna be postponed
Team Tyson apparently asked for the event to be postponed.
And I don’t want to speculate, but the timing of this announcement seems rather coincidental with last week’s CSAC’s discussions with VADA for PED testing.
Nope. According to ESPN, "The source confirmed that the organizers of this event needed more time to secure international television deals and tie up loose ends in regards to the pay-per-view."
Nope. I didn’t make it up, read the article for yourself.
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑10 Aug 2020, 05:22 Team Tyson apparently asked for the event to be postponed.
And I don’t want to speculate, but the timing of this announcement seems rather coincidental with last week’s CSAC’s discussions with VADA for PED testing.
Nope. According to ESPN, "The source confirmed that the organizers of this event needed more time to secure international television deals and tie up loose ends in regards to the pay-per-view."
Nope. I didn’t make it up, read the article for yourself.
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑10 Aug 2020, 05:22 Team Tyson apparently asked for the event to be postponed.
And I don’t want to speculate, but the timing of this announcement seems rather coincidental with last week’s CSAC’s discussions with VADA for PED testing.
Nope. According to ESPN, "The source confirmed that the organizers of this event needed more time to secure international television deals and tie up loose ends in regards to the pay-per-view."
Nope. I didn’t make it up, read the article for yourself.
oogiebe wrote: ↑10 Aug 2020, 12:21
Nope. According to ESPN, "The source confirmed that the organizers of this event needed more time to secure international television deals and tie up loose ends in regards to the pay-per-view."
Nope. I didn’t make it up, read the article for yourself.
oogiebe wrote: ↑10 Aug 2020, 12:21
Nope. According to ESPN, "The source confirmed that the organizers of this event needed more time to secure international television deals and tie up loose ends in regards to the pay-per-view."
Nope. I didn’t make it up, read the article for yourself.
Mike Tyson’s Legends Only League is a sports league created and owned by Mike Tyson and Eros Innovations.
So if Mike Tyson is one of the owners responsible for organising the bout, then his team chose to delay the exhibition.
And what did I originally claim?
Come one.. could be a few things..
But ESPN is a better source for American news than Metro, Express, Mirror.
Let’s rewind.
We agree that Tyson’s team, the organisers of the event and also the owners of the Legends Only League, delayed the exhibition, which means that the Metro and ESPN are reporting the same story.
If you’d read my post that you quoted, you would have realised this.
I can also provide more articles confirming Tyson’s desire to delay the bout (i.e. Fox Sports and The RING).
We also agree that last week the CSAC were having talks with VADA, after the media raised concerns about the lack of testing.
We also agree that Mike Tyson previously boasted that he burns through $40,000 of weed at his ranch every month.
So we only disagree about something I openly admitted was mere speculation, whereby you don’t believe that Mike Tyson (the owner of a cannabis empire that has also undergone a drastic physical transformation) would have decided to delay the bout due to fears of testing positive for banned substances (i.e. recreational drugs or PED’s).
Would you agree that’s a fair summary of the situation?
Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th
Posted: 10 Aug 2020, 21:14
by Tevfik1907
Imagine if this goes like
Then he takes Conor too
Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th
Posted: 11 Aug 2020, 10:23
by chinarich
The only drug testing that should happen is for anyone who decides to buy this farce...
Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th
Posted: 11 Aug 2020, 11:50
by oogiebe
chinarich wrote: ↑11 Aug 2020, 10:23
The only drug testing that should happen is for anyone who decides to buy this farce...
Seriously yes.
Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th
Posted: 11 Aug 2020, 12:04
by Enlightened-One
chinarich wrote: ↑11 Aug 2020, 10:23
The only drug testing that should happen is for anyone who decides to buy this farce...
Yes. I completely agree! Those that pay to watch this money-making circus event, cannot be mentally competent
However, the fighters (for safety reasons) need to be tested by VADA.
Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th
Posted: 11 Aug 2020, 14:08
by Ruthless-RKO
Roy Jones to insure his ears.. you know.. just in case.
Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th
Posted: 11 Aug 2020, 18:41
by Tevfik1907
Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th
Posted: 19 Aug 2020, 05:38
by Ruthless-RKO
I’ve had to cancel other stuff to be out here, it’s upset my calendar, I’ve got to change things,” Jones Jr told the Daily Mail.
“That’s why we have to table bulls**t now. That’s the biggest issue, I’m not a full time boxer anymore so I do other things to make an income. If I can’t do other things then I should be compensated for that, because it changes the schematics. It’s not acceptable.”
“We’re trying to figure something out, my lawyers is (sic) talking with their lawyers, trying to figure out ways to make it a better situation so that I can compensated for it, that is more beneficial for me to do.”
“If they don’t make it make sense, it (the fight) would be off,” He added.
Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th
Posted: 19 Aug 2020, 06:31
by Syntax Error
This 'fight' isn't happening.
Jones is probably being used as a foil to add some weird sort of prestige to proceedings until he eventually withdraws and Tyson ends up fighting his valet or maybe Homer Simpson or similar.
Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th
Posted: 19 Aug 2020, 06:43
by Enlightened-One
Jones Jr. would have left his calendar blank whilst prepping for an exhibition that was postponed due to a commercial decision made by Team Tyson. One party is at fault for the postponement, since it was due to a premeditated decision.
So it seems entirely reasonable for Roy to be compensated for any wasted training expenses and any lost income due to the postponement of the 12th September event.
And it’s also sensible for Roy to renegotiate new and improved terms for the revised date, due to the event generating more revenue than it would have done if it had been held on the 12th September, coupled with Jones Jr. having to cancel any existing plans that he would have earned income from, as well having to fork out additional training expenses.
Team Tyson postponed the event. And their decision cost Roy Jones Jr. money. So it’s only reasonable for them to reimburse him accordingly and also renegotiate improved terms for the revised exhibition date.
Team Tyson would have definitely appreciated the consequences of their decision to postpone the event, and they would have already anticipated the need to provide Roy with a revised and improved offer catering for the change in schedule.
I really don’t see any problem about the latest developments, because what’s being said is common sense business practice that most people would consider the norm.
Re: Roy Jones Jr v Mike Tyson Sep 12th
Posted: 19 Aug 2020, 06:51
by ILikeBeer
Syntax Error wrote: ↑19 Aug 2020, 06:31
This 'fight' isn't happening.
Jones is probably being used as a foil to add some weird sort of prestige to proceedings until he eventually withdraws and Tyson ends up fighting his valet or maybe Homer Simpson or similar.
Homer Simpson or similar? So somebody else fictitious?