Re: Fury - Top 10 of all time
Posted: 01 Dec 2025, 08:13
He just gonna post anniversaries now
He posts training videos every day, often spars with active pros.
He’s way way above Bruno. Bruno was found wanting against any top heavy who came to fight. He managed to beat a messed up mcall, old bugner, that’s about it. Fury only ever lost to usyk and it wasn’t easy either. He’s a class above Bruno.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑26 Nov 2025, 18:45Im being charitable, but heavyweight division isnt that deep to be fair, not too many heavyweights who won a title who had logevity.
Outside top 10, gets hard to rate people.
Is he above or below Bruno? Hard to say.
For what its worth, i think Fury had a lot of talent, with more discipline he could have done more. Never elite level, but he was competitive with Usyk twice, tjough of course should have lost by KO in their first fight.
I am inclined to agree. I'd say somewhere between 15-20 for me too, but it gets very difficult to rate people once you get beyond the established real top boys.cfang wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025, 13:18He’s way way above Bruno. Bruno was found wanting against any top heavy who came to fight. He managed to beat a messed up mcall, old bugner, that’s about it. Fury only ever lost to usyk and it wasn’t easy either. He’s a class above Bruno.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑26 Nov 2025, 18:45Im being charitable, but heavyweight division isnt that deep to be fair, not too many heavyweights who won a title who had logevity.
Outside top 10, gets hard to rate people.
Is he above or below Bruno? Hard to say.
For what its worth, i think Fury had a lot of talent, with more discipline he could have done more. Never elite level, but he was competitive with Usyk twice, tjough of course should have lost by KO in their first fight.
He’s not quite top ten for me tho mind. Fury prob 15-20 all time maybe for me.