Fury - Top 10 of all time

Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 102878
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Fury - Top 10 of all time

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

He just gonna post anniversaries now

mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23057
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fury - Top 10 of all time

Post by mickey1975 »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 01 Dec 2025, 08:13 He just gonna post anniversaries now

He posts training videos every day, often spars with active pros.
cfang
Middleweight
Posts: 947
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 16:50

Re: Fury - Top 10 of all time

Post by cfang »

jamesmcdonnell wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 18:45
Frostieballs wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 18:31
jamesmcdonnell wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 17:52 Hes top 15 maybe, just not enough good wins.
Nowhere near mate.
Im being charitable, but heavyweight division isnt that deep to be fair, not too many heavyweights who won a title who had logevity.

Outside top 10, gets hard to rate people.

Is he above or below Bruno? Hard to say.

For what its worth, i think Fury had a lot of talent, with more discipline he could have done more. Never elite level, but he was competitive with Usyk twice, tjough of course should have lost by KO in their first fight.
He’s way way above Bruno. Bruno was found wanting against any top heavy who came to fight. He managed to beat a messed up mcall, old bugner, that’s about it. Fury only ever lost to usyk and it wasn’t easy either. He’s a class above Bruno.

He’s not quite top ten for me tho mind. Fury prob 15-20 all time maybe for me.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45233
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Fury - Top 10 of all time

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

cfang wrote: 01 Dec 2025, 13:18
jamesmcdonnell wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 18:45
Frostieballs wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 18:31

Nowhere near mate.
Im being charitable, but heavyweight division isnt that deep to be fair, not too many heavyweights who won a title who had logevity.

Outside top 10, gets hard to rate people.

Is he above or below Bruno? Hard to say.

For what its worth, i think Fury had a lot of talent, with more discipline he could have done more. Never elite level, but he was competitive with Usyk twice, tjough of course should have lost by KO in their first fight.
He’s way way above Bruno. Bruno was found wanting against any top heavy who came to fight. He managed to beat a messed up mcall, old bugner, that’s about it. Fury only ever lost to usyk and it wasn’t easy either. He’s a class above Bruno.

He’s not quite top ten for me tho mind. Fury prob 15-20 all time maybe for me.
I am inclined to agree. I'd say somewhere between 15-20 for me too, but it gets very difficult to rate people once you get beyond the established real top boys.
dr_devious
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19

Re: Fury - Top 10 of all time

Post by dr_devious »

Fury is more like top 30 but with his size, awkwardness and bottle he'd be a difficult night for almost all of them.
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9181
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: Fury - Top 10 of all time

Post by gregregegg »

Zero clue where fury ranks as a pure boxer (as in if they all had a big tournement where would he come)... there is noone remotly like him to compare too. I think he would of beat everyone in the 60/70s... very unpopular but eh, thats just my thoughts.

But in terms of where he ranks as achivment... Very hard to say... Depends how much you rate old klit, and wilder...
Post Reply