Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns
Posted: 03 Jan 2015, 17:35
Will re read all of this i misunderstood .
Broomhall wrote:Could Burns not just give all his cash/assets to his wife, "leave" her and just declare bankruptcy?
If he tried that, she'd be deemed as holding the assets "on trust" for his creditors - i.e. Frank - and they'd be used to meet his liabilities. In these situations what is usually done is to get rid of the assets before there is a judgment...spudder56 wrote:Broomhall wrote:Could Burns not just give all his cash/assets to his wife, "leave" her and just declare bankruptcy?
No mate it's too late for that he will have to pay up
dookus wrote:If he tried that, she'd be deemed as holding the assets "on trust" for his creditors - i.e. Frank - and they'd be used to meet his liabilities. In these situations what is usually done is to get rid of the assets before there is a judgment...spudder56 wrote:Broomhall wrote:Could Burns not just give all his cash/assets to his wife, "leave" her and just declare bankruptcy?
No mate it's too late for that he will have to pay up