Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post Reply
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by Sklar »

This is devastating news for Ricky. Whilst the buck obviously has to stop with him, it appears that he has been badly let down by his advisers, you'd think that this could ruin him financially unless somebody steps in to help him out.
Karl Jade
Cruiserweight
Posts: 734
Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 16:40

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by Karl Jade »

As if anyone's going to help him out. Terrible for him, though. Career pretty much finishing and financially wrecked.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23015
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by mickey1975 »

I bet he's glad he kept that job in the sports shop...
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by freddydoesdallas »

hopefully, he's protected himself financially and his wife owns the house
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by orbtastic »

The wrong advices.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23015
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by mickey1975 »

It's a kick in the teeth. Especially if a now defunct company of FW still owes him from the Mitchell fight.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32850
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Oh dear, oh dear. As promotional splits go, this has to be one of the least successful for a boxer.
Gazmac81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2103
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 10:06

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by Gazmac81 »

Didnt burns win a case against warren few months ago about oustanding payments?

its a nightmare situation , feel for Burns
grub
Cruiserweight
Posts: 144
Joined: 15 Feb 2011, 13:18

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by grub »

Gazmac81 wrote:Didnt burns win a case against warren few months ago about oustanding payments?

its a nightmare situation , feel for Burns
He did, but as Mickey points out above; he won the case against a now defunct company (and therefore will likely not get a penny) but has lost two cases against FW (the person) and therefore has to pay-up on those.
Gazmac81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2103
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 10:06

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by Gazmac81 »

well i hope Eddies been paying him extremley well and he can cover this and still have a bit left,

Seriously doubt it though
DazDiCanio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 506
Joined: 21 Apr 2013, 04:49

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by DazDiCanio »

All promoters are just there for the money. People that believe this new age fan friendly bullshit are fools.

Fact is, Ricky has been tapped up, told to write this nonsense letter that supposedly gets him out of any legal obligations( :roll: ) with FW and now has been well and truly shafted.

Man who gives it all in the ring does not deserve to be taken for a complete ride by those outside of it.

Horrible side of the sport, just awful for the boy.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by palooka »

I bet the lawyers come out of it fine, you'd have imagined that matchroom lawyers would have looked over the contracts before Ricky switched and advised him. Surely he's not just walked into this with his eyes shut?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by palooka »

DazDiCanio wrote:All promoters are just there for the money. People that believe this new age fan friendly bullshit are fools.

Fact is, Ricky has been tapped up, told to write this nonsense letter that supposedly gets him out of any legal obligations( :roll: ) with FW and now has been well and truly shafted.

Man who gives it all in the ring does not deserve to be taken for a complete ride by those outside of it.

Horrible side of the sport, just awful for the boy.
Good post daz :salut:
whiteboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 540
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 19:48

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by whiteboy »

makes me feel like cancelling my BN subscription to be honest
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23015
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by mickey1975 »

whiteboy wrote:makes me feel like cancelling my BN subscription to be honest
Did you feel like cancelling Sky when he jumped ship?
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by tobyh5 »

Not a fan of the promoter nor a hater. But contracts are contracts. Cannot blame the promoter for protecting his legal interests. The fighter and his advisors are to blame. They signed a contract and should have honoured it. They were happy with it when getting title fights and the money.

If promoters do not sue then what is to stop every fighter in every land just fckuing off whenever they fancy it?
whiteboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 540
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 19:48

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by whiteboy »

mickey1975 wrote:
whiteboy wrote:makes me feel like cancelling my BN subscription to be honest
Did you feel like cancelling Sky when he jumped ship?
who, burns?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by palooka »

tobyh5 wrote:Not a fan of the promoter nor a hater. But contracts are contracts. Cannot blame the promoter for protecting his legal interests. The fighter and his advisors are to blame. They signed a contract and should have honoured it. They were happy with it when getting title fights and the money.

If promoters do not sue then what is to stop every fighter in every land just fckuing off whenever they fancy it?
That's a good point Toby and it seems as if some of the more established promoters show genius when protecting themselves with companies that are shells or declare bankruptcy - it does seem as if the boxer as an individual is insecure when dealing with promotional companies. It should be a symbiotic relationship and it does sometimes seem a parasitic relationship.
BillyTKid
Cruiserweight
Posts: 401
Joined: 08 Sep 2010, 13:19

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by BillyTKid »

Is anybody else in the process of being sued for moving to match room? Or was it just burns who was mid contract?
domjon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 122
Joined: 22 Apr 2009, 19:41

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by domjon »

whiteboy wrote:makes me feel like cancelling my BN subscription to be honest
I already have. Fvcked if I'm funding this sort of shit.
SteveDow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1800
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 20:05

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by SteveDow »

If the advice he has been given is negligent he should be able to sue whoever gave the advice, assuming it was given by a solicitor. All solicitors have to have indemnity insurance and so if he has relied on the advice of a solicitor that acted negligently then he should be able to sue. If not then he's right up the creek without a paddle.
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by tobyh5 »

SteveDow wrote:If the advice he has been given is negligent he should be able to sue whoever gave the advice, assuming it was given by a solicitor. All solicitors have to have indemnity insurance and so if he has relied on the advice of a solicitor that acted negligently then he should be able to sue. If not then he's right up the creek without a paddle.
That thought struck me as well. Solicitor probably a limited company that will also cease trading before adding a word to their trading name with a new limited company :OhYes:
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by Sklar »

tobyh5 wrote:
SteveDow wrote:If the advice he has been given is negligent he should be able to sue whoever gave the advice, assuming it was given by a solicitor. All solicitors have to have indemnity insurance and so if he has relied on the advice of a solicitor that acted negligently then he should be able to sue. If not then he's right up the creek without a paddle.
That thought struck me as well. Solicitor probably a limited company that will also cease trading before adding a word to their trading name with a new limited company :OhYes:
LOL. Burns' solicitor turned over more than 100 million quid last year and they've been in business since before the war, so I don't think this will sink them. If they've got any shame, though, they'll hang their heads but I won't be holding my breath.
TopGun
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 24 Jun 2012, 05:27

Re: Allegedly wins latest court battle against Burns

Post by TopGun »

I notice how Matchroom are not getting any stick here. They were the ones that started this whole process, surely they should be backing Ricky now and digging deep to help him out.

Not sure how Frank can lose a court case and just not pay it by closing the company, surely he can just do this every time and dodge all cases he loses? Seems unfair to me.
Post Reply