WLAD RETIRES

MachoTime
Middleweight
Posts: 1420
Joined: 18 Nov 2013, 02:13

Re: WLAD RETIRES

Post by MachoTime »

Ossyrules wrote:
MachoTime wrote:
Ossyrules wrote:Kalan you're a slave to numbers, and hugely under estimate fighters of yesteryear. Nobody in today's boxing knows how to fight inside like the old guys could, and Frazier was one of the best ever. A supremely strong and resilient guy. Cut from a completely different cloth to today's guys.

There is no evidence Wlad could deal with a guy like Frazier. Saying foreman beat Frazier really is a poor arguement from you
What the fu*k would you know. Wlad would have slaughtered the little midget. Go Back to England.
Great response you clearly know your boxing

Facking melt
Duh. Go drink a few pints while your add it. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24657
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: WLAD RETIRES

Post by Tony1244 »

Frazier would have broken Wlad down. Wlad never fought a Frazier. They haven't existed in the HW division after Tyson.

Now Wlad was a much better older fighter. If we're going to count talent from 35 years old and on, Wlad wins hands down against Ali and Frazier. But w/ them all at their very best, I see the order 1) Ali, 2) Frazier 3) Wlad.
Last edited by Tony1244 on 07 Aug 2017, 08:58, edited 1 time in total.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: WLAD RETIRES

Post by Ossyrules »

MachoTime wrote:
Ossyrules wrote:
MachoTime wrote:
What the fu*k would you know. Wlad would have slaughtered the little midget. Go Back to England.
Great response you clearly know your boxing

Facking melt
Duh. Go drink a few pints while your add it. :lol: :lol: :lol:
I'm on it, I'll meet you at the pub

Melt
MachoTime
Middleweight
Posts: 1420
Joined: 18 Nov 2013, 02:13

Re: WLAD RETIRES

Post by MachoTime »

Ossyrules wrote:
MachoTime wrote:
Ossyrules wrote:
Great response you clearly know your boxing

Facking melt
Duh. Go drink a few pints while your add it. :lol: :lol: :lol:
I'm on it, I'll meet you at the pub

Melt
Im in the USA. You want to come here. No problems Bro you're alright. And no Frazier wouldn't stand a chance against Wlad. My IMO
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: WLAD RETIRES

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Frazier would have battered Wlad.
I think the fact he was such a slow started would have been his undoing.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: WLAD RETIRES

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

I'd have picked a prime Tyson over wlad. The speed and ecplosiveness would have been too much. Frazier lacked the speed and relied too much on one shot.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: WLAD RETIRES

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Frazier would have battered Wlad.
I think the fact he was such a slow started would have been his undoing.
Whom? The 'prime' wlad started a lot slower than Frazier.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: WLAD RETIRES

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:I'd have picked a prime Tyson over wlad. The speed and ecplosiveness would have been too much. Frazier lacked the speed and relied too much on one shot.
Joe was very fast. I'd pick Tyson too, but I like wlads chances a lot better there. He could hold Mike.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: WLAD RETIRES

Post by Ossyrules »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:I'd have picked a prime Tyson over wlad. The speed and ecplosiveness would have been too much. Frazier lacked the speed and relied too much on one shot.
Frazier speed is underrated. He's not tyson but he had other qualities, better engine, bigger heart, better resolve, mentally unstoppable.

Wlad never faced a guy who was trained to get inside the jab and then kill his body
MachoTime
Middleweight
Posts: 1420
Joined: 18 Nov 2013, 02:13

Re: WLAD RETIRES

Post by MachoTime »

Ossyrules wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I'd have picked a prime Tyson over wlad. The speed and ecplosiveness would have been too much. Frazier lacked the speed and relied too much on one shot.
Frazier speed is underrated. He's not tyson but he had other qualities, better engine, bigger heart, better resolve, mentally unstoppable.

Wlad never faced a guy who was trained to get inside the jab and then kill his body
Frazier is a midget. You should really head down to the pub and slam a few English Crappy beers.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: WLAD RETIRES

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

It's all just hypothesis anyway.
493dart
Super Middleweight
Posts: 81
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 16:44

Re: WLAD RETIRES

Post by 493dart »

GOOD------------- no more CLINCHING AND LEANING ON OPPONENTS BACK !!!

fornicate Clinchko. Non aggressive, holding , boring ,


loved when Fury SCHOOLED him .
Badhusker
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: WLAD RETIRES

Post by Badhusker »

MachoTime wrote:
Ossyrules wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I'd have picked a prime Tyson over wlad. The speed and ecplosiveness would have been too much. Frazier lacked the speed and relied too much on one shot.
Frazier speed is underrated. He's not tyson but he had other qualities, better engine, bigger heart, better resolve, mentally unstoppable.

Wlad never faced a guy who was trained to get inside the jab and then kill his body
Frazier is a midget. You should really head down to the pub and slam a few English Crappy beers.

Frazier wasn't big, but did have a couple of inches in height and reach on Mike Tyson. I thought he was awkward, and very good the way he bobbed around. gave Ali hell. Then he met George Foreman.
MachoTime
Middleweight
Posts: 1420
Joined: 18 Nov 2013, 02:13

Re: WLAD RETIRES

Post by MachoTime »

Badhusker wrote:
MachoTime wrote:
Ossyrules wrote:
Frazier speed is underrated. He's not tyson but he had other qualities, better engine, bigger heart, better resolve, mentally unstoppable.

Wlad never faced a guy who was trained to get inside the jab and then kill his body
Frazier is a midget. You should really head down to the pub and slam a few English Crappy beers.

Frazier wasn't big, but did have a couple of inches in height and reach on Mike Tyson. I thought he was awkward, and very good the way he bobbed around. gave Ali hell. Then he met George Foreman.
It was a exciting era back then. I think Tyson would have taken the later version of Foreman. Im not so sure about the early Tyson vs. Early Foreman. That would have been a hell of fight..
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: WLAD RETIRES

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

493dart wrote:GOOD------------- no more CLINCHING AND LEANING ON OPPONENTS BACK !!!

eff Clinchko. Non aggressive, holding , boring ,


loved when Fury SCHOOLED him .
Ali was one of the worst for pulling down on his opponents heads. He was a pretty talented grappler
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: WLAD RETIRES

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Ossyrules wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I'd have picked a prime Tyson over wlad. The speed and ecplosiveness would have been too much. Frazier lacked the speed and relied too much on one shot.
Frazier speed is underrated. He's not tyson but he had other qualities, better engine, bigger heart, better resolve, mentally unstoppable.

Wlad never faced a guy who was trained to get inside the jab and then kill his body
Yes that's true. I also feel though he was susceptible to big punchers. He never beat any really big hitters at top level.
Post Reply