BoxRec

dalcumly wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 17:43 There's probably around 1,700 people who've looked at this thread without placing a comment. I don't know what there views are - but neither does anybody else.
But there's the usual group who believe that everybody thinks the same as them. Smith, Froch etc are hopeless EVERYBODY knows that don't they ? Well do they ? Every body agrees that having a female presenter, to comply with an equality and diversity policy is Ok because she's better than a lot of male presenters ,EVERYBODy knows that don't they ? Well do they ??

A repeat 1,700 people have looked at this and there's only 149 responses ,many of them repeats and some which are just filth.

When I first started on boxrec there were quite a few members who were actively involved in the professional game and we occasionally got 'breaking news' and interesting insights - they've all gone. Thanks to the the usual brigade ( and we know who they are ), who are continually back slapping each other because of another useless, bad -mouthed tirade.
Well I've better things to do with time. You can write whatever crap you want in response, I won't see it.
I'm finished with this forum I'll use boxrec in future only for results and fighters records.

dalcumly wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 17:43 There's probably around 1,700 people who've looked at this thread without placing a comment. I don't know what there views are - but neither does anybody else.
But there's the usual group who believe that everybody thinks the same as them. Smith, Froch etc are hopeless EVERYBODY knows that don't they ? Well do they ? Every body agrees that having a female presenter, to comply with an equality and diversity policy is Ok because she's better than a lot of male presenters ,EVERYBODy knows that don't they ? Well do they ??

A repeat 1,700 people have looked at this and there's only 149 responses ,many of them repeats and some which are just filth.

When I first started on boxrec there were quite a few members who were actively involved in the professional game and we occasionally got 'breaking news' and interesting insights - they've all gone. Thanks to the the usual brigade ( and we know who they are ), who are continually back slapping each other because of another useless, bad -mouthed tirade.
Well I've better things to do with time. You can write whatever crap you want in response, I won't see it.
I'm finished with this forum I'll use boxrec in future only for results and fighters records.

dalcumly wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 17:43 There's probably around 1,700 people who've looked at this thread without placing a comment. I don't know what there views are - but neither does anybody else.
But there's the usual group who believe that everybody thinks the same as them. Smith, Froch etc are hopeless EVERYBODY knows that don't they ? Well do they ? Every body agrees that having a female presenter, to comply with an equality and diversity policy is Ok because she's better than a lot of male presenters ,EVERYBODy knows that don't they ? Well do they ??

A repeat 1,700 people have looked at this and there's only 149 responses ,many of them repeats and some which are just filth.

When I first started on boxrec there were quite a few members who were actively involved in the professional game and we occasionally got 'breaking news' and interesting insights - they've all gone. Thanks to the the usual brigade ( and we know who they are ), who are continually back slapping each other because of another useless, bad -mouthed tirade.
Well I've better things to do with time. You can write whatever crap you want in response, I won't see it.
I'm finished with this forum I'll use boxrec in future only for results and fighters records.

forcefraser wrote: ↑07 Jun 2019, 10:24 There's no place for a split Harris in boxing. Sling em back to the kitchen.

Ever heard a female football commentator? Utter gash. Just sounds forced and wrong.

I'm not for positive discrimination at all. I want Ricky Keys talking about smashing IT. Not some tarted up bird posing and pouting on a sport she Ken's nowt about.

If I want eye candy or material for the bishop bashing bank I'll go on porn hub.

I want regression to the 70's. This snowflake PC nonsense does my kipper in.

Give em a few quid and tell em to get lost cos the boxing's on.

samwbr wrote: ↑16 Jun 2019, 07:26 Is the lady on BT Sports Boxing grizzled enough to pass muster? Thought she was very good.

samwbr wrote: ↑12 Jun 2019, 01:48 Sill waiting for this equality and diversity policy to be shown too, any sign of it yet? Or is it just in your mind?

overhand_right wrote: ↑16 Jun 2019, 15:50 There are equality and diversity policies in TV, on screen and off screen.

samwbr wrote: ↑16 Jun 2019, 16:16 Sky can employ who they want. She does a good job.
Where are these policies that say they have to do what you suggest?

samwbr wrote: ↑16 Jun 2019, 16:16 Sky can employ who they want. She does a good job.
Where are these policies that say they have to do what you suggest?

ewenhay wrote: ↑05 Jun 2019, 15:25 To be honest she does well to hold the show together some nights when Johnny Nelson and Carl Froch are on.

Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑21 Jun 2019, 14:45 She’s looking fine tonight

samwbr wrote: ↑16 Jun 2019, 16:16 Sky can employ who they want. She does a good job.
Where are these policies that say they have to do what you suggest?

3132DW wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 00:25 Sky’s policy of putting a women on every shoe is getting embarrassing - Sunday footy/cricket/golf etc...just to avoid questions.

Fair enough if your there on merit but a lot are just on the show so Sky can tick a box.

samwbr wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 01:09 Which box? Who is making them do this admin?

3132DW wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 02:30 The equal opportunity box and we give women loads of chances and put them on all our major shows box.

Regardless if they are any use - the one on Soccer Sunday is like a spare prick sitting in the middle of Souness/Redknapp/Neville - you can see them looking like what are you doing here.

samwbr wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 02:40 No one makes Sky employ or not employ anyone, they can do what they like. There is no quota or policy they have to follow.

3132DW wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 06:26 Yeah but you have Hand-Wringers and do gooders who p*ss and moan about everything if it’s not Politcally correct.