Re: Olympic boxing 2024
Posted: 03 Aug 2024, 14:56
I thought Richardson lost 2-1. Glad I was wrong.
Let's all be honest, nobody cares about women's amateur boxing. Nobody "clears" anyone to fight. They provide a female passport, and they are good to go. Once they reach a certain level, someone might get involved and force individuals to undergo testing, but never before that, if ever.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑03 Aug 2024, 14:53 how do you even know that when it comes to testing in past years? the iba isnt remotely transparent about what testing was given in what years. they wont release anything and are extremely vague, citing confidentiality while continually blasting khelif and accusing them of being dishonest. the president has only given a couple comments to russian televison and wont go into it further
what is known for sure is they passed khelif to box in years before and there is no evidence of anyone coming forward raising any suspicion of their sex
too bad the hungarian didnt quit, maybe the iba wouldve paid her 100k like they did the italian![]()
I don't speak Russian, but my girlfriend does. I won't ask her to go down that rabbit hole just to continue this argument with you, sorry. We just watched what Kremlev said about the prize money. It doesn't only go to the Italian boxer Carini. Everyone losing to Khelif and Lin Yu-ting will be rewarded as if they won Olympic gold. That's what he said, not only Carini will be rewarded. You can't believe anything the media puts out these days.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑03 Aug 2024, 15:00 okay, so what did he say about the testing procedures in past years? what were they and why was khelif allowed to box then? did he only learn about dna in 2023? has he released reports on the 2023 testing to russian media? how does he know khelif is being dishonest?
paying the italian quitter 100k, wtf![]()
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑03 Aug 2024, 15:15 right, in other words you have no idea about the testing. nor should you, since the iba has virtually no transparency.
if theyre all getting a 100k payout getting drawn against those 2 may be the best thing that ever happened to those boxers, especially the quitters who werent even close to medal rounds. imagine youre an elite boxer and win silver, and some far inferior boxers, including 40 second quitters, get gold money just for drawing the algerian or chinese
iba gotta have some poster girls in their battle with the ioc. i notice a smiling photo of carini is the first thing on their homepage
Damn you really hate female boxing with a passion, you literally lie about every single detail, even the smallest ones. May I ask you why?margaret thatcher wrote: ↑03 Aug 2024, 15:15 right, in other words you have no idea about the testing. nor should you, since the iba has virtually no transparency.
if theyre all getting a 100k payout getting drawn against those 2 may be the best thing that ever happened to those boxers, especially the quitters who werent even close to medal rounds. imagine youre an elite boxer and win silver, and some far inferior boxers, including 40 second quitters, get gold money just for drawing the algerian or chinese
iba gotta have some poster girls in their battle with the ioc. i notice a smiling photo of carini is the first thing on their homepage
You may find this interesting. IBA are shambolic.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑03 Aug 2024, 20:02 this is from the president of the iba on social media talking about the ioc btw, what a guy![]()
![]()
what a f@cking mess, embarrasingdookus wrote: ↑05 Aug 2024, 13:53You may find this interesting. IBA are shambolic.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑03 Aug 2024, 20:02 this is from the president of the iba on social media talking about the ioc btw, what a guy![]()
![]()
https://www.bbc.com/sport/olympics/arti ... 5dd2lz8y8o
I agree it is farcical and looks shady - the norm in boxing unfortunately. Khelif and Lin's 2023 disqualifications begs the question why didn't they take it to the Court of Arbitration for Sport? I would suggest, because they knew they would lose.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑05 Aug 2024, 19:21what a f@cking mess, embarrasingdookus wrote: ↑05 Aug 2024, 13:53You may find this interesting. IBA are shambolic.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑03 Aug 2024, 20:02 this is from the president of the iba on social media talking about the ioc btw, what a guy![]()
![]()
https://www.bbc.com/sport/olympics/arti ... 5dd2lz8y8o
so yes it was a testosterone test, oh wait no it actually wasnt, but we wont say we were wrong about that. and we didn't make khelif's sex an issue, oh wait ya we did mention that she's a man deceiving people about it, and we paid off her opponent's team 100k, true. and ya the exact same testing didnt find khelif to be a male in 2022, but hey things can change a lot in a year. oh and by the way the ioc are sodomites.
is the iba serious with all this or is this satire![]()
3rd round scoring was off IMOmargaret thatcher wrote: ↑06 Aug 2024, 17:38 usa's final male boxer eliminated, meaning their mens gold medal drought will rise to at least 24 years
lewy richardson out vs a good mexican, bronze a great showing for richy
This is a good article. It seems they were tested in 2022 after complaints from other nations but the IBA didn't/couldn't act on it until the worlds in 2023 when they were tested again..margaret thatcher wrote: ↑06 Aug 2024, 17:32 good question tbf. if propose anohter possibility, that maybe cuz they knew the crazy iba dudes wouldnt be running the olympics
they werent men when tested in 2022, yet were men in 2023 using the same test, okay![]()