Re: Billy Joe Saunders v Eubank Jnr
Posted: 25 Sep 2014, 12:00
I make it 5 o'clock whose he fighting? 
CEJ has fans?CiganoBoxer wrote:Eunbak got his chance at a huge leapfrog up in class,payday and the rankings ...what excuses are his fans gonna make for him if he has bottled it and don't sign the 5pm deadline today ??DD
Synopsis: the fight was never made.billy bessey wrote:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BzSCk_DpP3M
I bought them on Sunday because I was getting twitchy from looking at the Eventim site seating plan that tickets I was prepared to pay for would sell out prior to the press conference.scrap iron wrote:
I've been stung a few times before on tickets for fights that never happen so I do feel sympathy for you.
However if you thought it was "Soooooo predictable" that Saunders v Eubank Jnr wouldn't happen why the hell would you buy tickets on the basis that it would?
As for getting a refund I think legally you can only demand one if the tickets actually have "Saunders v Eubank Jnr" written on them. The reason why a refund was offered for the 26 July show is because the tickets clearly had "Chisora v Fury" written on them. So the people who didn't go and returned their tickets got a full refund. I think your best chance of a refund for the 29 November show is if Chisora or Fury pull out of the main event again.
A few years ago a lot of shows I went to would only have "Championship Boxing" written on them, this meant bills could completely change from the day of announcement to the night of the fight and as long as some bogus title was still on the line ticketing agencies could dig their heels in and refuse to give a refund.
Can you put a brief description of what he said please mate? I'm on a mobile device & can't view at the moment.lefty wrote:Frank Warrens take on events https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLtOI7D ... 45eHFGAduw
Counter-puncher wrote:CEJ has fans?CiganoBoxer wrote:Eunbak got his chance at a huge leapfrog up in class,payday and the rankings ...what excuses are his fans gonna make for him if he has bottled it and don't sign the 5pm deadline today ??DD
I am not surprised at all if they knew Eubank would bottle it but took advantage of it anyway just to sell tickets for the event etcMaxsplit wrote:I bought them on Sunday because I was getting twitchy from looking at the Eventim site seating plan that tickets I was prepared to pay for would sell out prior to the press conference.scrap iron wrote:
I've been stung a few times before on tickets for fights that never happen so I do feel sympathy for you.
However if you thought it was "Soooooo predictable" that Saunders v Eubank Jnr wouldn't happen why the hell would you buy tickets on the basis that it would?
As for getting a refund I think legally you can only demand one if the tickets actually have "Saunders v Eubank Jnr" written on them. The reason why a refund was offered for the 26 July show is because the tickets clearly had "Chisora v Fury" written on them. So the people who didn't go and returned their tickets got a full refund. I think your best chance of a refund for the 29 November show is if Chisora or Fury pull out of the main event again.
A few years ago a lot of shows I went to would only have "Championship Boxing" written on them, this meant bills could completely change from the day of announcement to the night of the fight and as long as some bogus title was still on the line ticketing agencies could dig their heels in and refuse to give a refund.
And I am a sucker as I wanted it to be true ... even though it was too good to be true
As much stick as he gets you are spot on.mullenman wrote:i have had allegedly since the very first day
if this fight does not go ahead i am cancelling allegedly and watching live stream like my mates do
if the stories are true fwank is a gangster and this is not something eddie hearn would ever do
The general gist of it was that the fight had been agreed between them a few times and that Frank had been talking to the Eubanks till 11pm last night and it was apparantly done but then this morning at 8 or something it was off again. It all sounds bizarre to be honest.Boxerbeetle wrote:Can you put a brief description of what he said please mate? I'm on a mobile device & can't view at the moment.lefty wrote:Frank Warrens take on events https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLtOI7D ... 45eHFGAduw
He has quite a few fights listed as Scott Quigg vs TBA though and so on. Obviously not as bad as the forementioned but still not great.Naandrew wrote:As much stick as he gets you are spot on.mullenman wrote:i have had allegedly since the very first day
if this fight does not go ahead i am cancelling allegedly and watching live stream like my mates do
if the stories are true fwank is a gangster and this is not something eddie hearn would ever do
You clearly havent read through the thread mateCrease wrote:This could be a very tough fight for both men. I'm predicting a Saunders victory on points.
lefty wrote:You clearly havent read through the thread mateCrease wrote:This could be a very tough fight for both men. I'm predicting a Saunders victory on points.
Nah mate, I didn't. A couple of friends of mine have watched Eubank Jr and they are convinced that he is the real deal. I'm just not as keen on him as they are. For me, I'm not sure if he will ever develop in to a world-class skilled boxer, nor do I think that he carries concussive KO power. So I find it difficult to envisage the finished-article of him being a World-Class operator.lefty wrote:You clearly havent read through the thread mate
100% agreed.black panther wrote:It's bang out of order to announce a fight that hasn't even been signed.