Page 8 of 8
Re: Hearn says rematch clause triggered
Posted: 19 Jun 2019, 16:55
by Coco
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑19 Jun 2019, 16:48
No, it was a mandatory. The Klitschko's were brutal with that poo. Vitali wanted Hayes first born son.
There was a rematch clause there yeah?
Re: Hearn says rematch clause triggered
Posted: 19 Jun 2019, 17:20
by Onetimeonly
Coco wrote: ↑19 Jun 2019, 16:55
There was a rematch clause there yeah?
Yup
Re: Hearn says rematch clause triggered
Posted: 20 Jun 2019, 00:16
by stellar
Coco wrote: ↑19 Jun 2019, 08:47
Was Klit v Fury a voluntary? I can't remember
from wbo or wba.urcite it was a mandatory defense. i think of wbo it was.wlado that fight generally did not want and Fury was obligatory for chisora when fury in a box with Hammer, so he knew that Klicko had to box with him and Klicko on voluntary jenningsa.sorry my english
