Page 8 of 8

Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson

Posted: 03 Mar 2023, 11:21
by keithmoonhangover
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:01
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 10:26
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 09:31

By the way, rolled on the floor while holding his balls to become THE HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION. Also, was destroyed by Baer and the fighters which names you will never f8cken remember. :TU:
For a time, Schmeling was the #1 heavyweight in the world and was recognised all over the world as the champ. Ross Purrity, well, he wasn't. :lol:
If you weren't so silly and knew the 1st grade math, you would realize that Klit himself was somehow #1 HW about 10 times longer than Schmeling. :OhYes:
....and Joe Louis was champ longer than Klitschko. So if that's important to you, Louis wins

Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson

Posted: 03 Mar 2023, 11:22
by DrDuke
HomicideHenry wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:19
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:01
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 10:26

For a time, Schmeling was the #1 heavyweight in the world and was recognised all over the world as the champ. Ross Purrity, well, he wasn't. :lol:
If you weren't so silly and knew the 1st grade math, you would realize that Klit himself was somehow #1 HW about 10 times longer than Schmeling. :OhYes:
Erm why argue.... once again they're so called number one heavyweight lost to a guy arguably worse than Ross Puritty in Gypsy Daniels by first round knockout.
Just for those clowns to counter with more anectodes. :D

Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson

Posted: 03 Mar 2023, 11:24
by DrDuke
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:21
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:01
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 10:26

For a time, Schmeling was the #1 heavyweight in the world and was recognised all over the world as the champ. Ross Purrity, well, he wasn't. :lol:
If you weren't so silly and knew the 1st grade math, you would realize that Klit himself was somehow #1 HW about 10 times longer than Schmeling. :OhYes:
....and Joe Louis was champ longer than Klitschko. So if that's important to you, Louis wins
So, after you failed to prove, that Maxie was better than Klit, you simply picked another fighter to compare. Someone gotta be better than the gawddamn Klit. :D

The Klit lovers are amusing. :yay:

Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson

Posted: 03 Mar 2023, 11:28
by keithmoonhangover
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:24
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:21
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:01

If you weren't so silly and knew the 1st grade math, you would realize that Klit himself was somehow #1 HW about 10 times longer than Schmeling. :OhYes:
....and Joe Louis was champ longer than Klitschko. So if that's important to you, Louis wins
So, after you failed to prove, that Maxie was better than Klit, you simply picked another fighter to compare. Someone gotta be better than the gawddamn Klit. :D

The Klit lovers are amusing. :yay:
Alas, we were discussing Louis and Klitschko. The reason Max was mentioned was because he was arguably Louis' worst loss.

Are you saying Ross Purity is better than Schmeling?

Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson

Posted: 03 Mar 2023, 11:34
by DrDuke
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:28
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:24
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:21

....and Joe Louis was champ longer than Klitschko. So if that's important to you, Louis wins
So, after you failed to prove, that Maxie was better than Klit, you simply picked another fighter to compare. Someone gotta be better than the gawddamn Klit. :D

The Klit lovers are amusing. :yay:
Alas, we were discussing Louis and Klitschko. The reason Max was mentioned was because he was arguably Louis' worst loss.

Are you saying Ross Purity is better than Schmeling?
Nah, you, the klitlovers, were simply picking different fighters to claim they were better than the Klits. Don't try to escape from the subject, especially with these questions trying to drag irrational conclusions out of my words.

Better rename your page to 'klitmoonhangover'. :OhYes:

Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson

Posted: 03 Mar 2023, 12:05
by keithmoonhangover
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:34
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:28
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:24

So, after you failed to prove, that Maxie was better than Klit, you simply picked another fighter to compare. Someone gotta be better than the gawddamn Klit. :D

The Klit lovers are amusing. :yay:
Alas, we were discussing Louis and Klitschko. The reason Max was mentioned was because he was arguably Louis' worst loss.

Are you saying Ross Purity is better than Schmeling?
Better rename your page to 'klitmoonhangover'. :OhYes:
You know I'm arguing against Klitschko, don't you? :confused:

Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson

Posted: 03 Mar 2023, 12:34
by DrDuke
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 12:05
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:34
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:28

Alas, we were discussing Louis and Klitschko. The reason Max was mentioned was because he was arguably Louis' worst loss.

Are you saying Ross Purity is better than Schmeling?
Better rename your page to 'klitmoonhangover'. :OhYes:
You know I'm arguing against Klitschko, don't you? :confused:
The biggest lovers are haters. There're a couple of you clowns on this board, who are always ready to fill their two cents in about the Klits. Ain't it the true huge loving love? :OhYes:

Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson

Posted: 03 Mar 2023, 13:58
by gilgamesh
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 12:34
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 12:05
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:34

Better rename your page to 'klitmoonhangover'. :OhYes:
You know I'm arguing against Klitschko, don't you? :confused:
The biggest lovers are haters. There're a couple of you clowns on this board, who are always ready to fill their two cents in about the Klits. Ain't it the true huge loving love? :OhYes:
To this point. I will say that. Over the years that's probably another reason why Boxing has appealed to me a little less. I used to have strong feelings about some specific fighters. Either I was REALLY a fan or I was REALLY not. I noticed after a while I never got nearly as strongly into the fights if I didn't feel strongly about one or both of the fighters involved.

So yeah in all seriousness. For me anyway. It is more fun to watch a guy you hate fight, than it is to watch a guy you know nothing at all about.

I also would always pride myself on, no matter how I feel about the fighter I'm gonna call it like I see it in regards to whether he's winning the rounds or the fight. Once the bell rings, I let the action speak for itself.

Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson

Posted: 03 Mar 2023, 14:52
by keithmoonhangover
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 12:34
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 12:05
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 11:34

Better rename your page to 'klitmoonhangover'. :OhYes:
You know I'm arguing against Klitschko, don't you? :confused:
The biggest lovers are haters. There're a couple of you clowns on this board, who are always ready to fill their two cents in about the Klits. Ain't it the true huge loving love? :OhYes:
You're either drunk, brain damaged or just plain stupid. Either way, just leave me alone. :TU:

Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson

Posted: 03 Mar 2023, 15:10
by DrDuke
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 14:52
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 12:34
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 12:05

You know I'm arguing against Klitschko, don't you? :confused:
The biggest lovers are haters. There're a couple of you clowns on this board, who are always ready to fill their two cents in about the Klits. Ain't it the true huge loving love? :OhYes:
You're either drunk, brain damaged or just plain stupid. Either way, just leave me alone. :TU:
:lol:

Just don't cry.

Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson

Posted: 03 Mar 2023, 15:37
by keithmoonhangover
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 15:10
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 14:52
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 12:34

The biggest lovers are haters. There're a couple of you clowns on this board, who are always ready to fill their two cents in about the Klits. Ain't it the true huge loving love? :OhYes:
You're either drunk, brain damaged or just plain stupid. Either way, just leave me alone. :TU:
:lol:

Just don't cry.
How very mature of you.

Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson

Posted: 03 Mar 2023, 15:46
by DrDuke
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 15:37
DrDuke wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 15:10
keithmoonhangover wrote: 03 Mar 2023, 14:52

You're either drunk, brain damaged or just plain stupid. Either way, just leave me alone. :TU:
:lol:

Just don't cry.
How very mature of you.
That urge to write something back. :OhYes:

Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson

Posted: 03 Mar 2023, 21:53
by oogiebe
Oooooo...someone's triggered!!! :clap: :yay: