BoxRec

Finch wrote:

Horse wrote: 3. (3.) Carl Froch
4. (4.) David Haye

I believe most people think that Haye should be above Froch, which is a reasonable point of view. However, I am a member of the sizable minority who thinks that Froch should be above Haye. I don't really think that is a ridiculous opinion.

Horse wrote:Murray fell out because of inactivity. Murray will re-enter, quite possibly above Duddy, if he beats Lawton this month. I would favour Murray if he fought Rees, although I would give Rees a decent chance.

I have never heard as much bulls**t, Rees was inactive for over a year and was still in the list, Elcock has lost 4 of his fights and is in the top 30 and Murray has never been beaten and he isn't in the list.

Horse- are you Fr*nk Warren or Dean Powell

crusader wrote:

Rogan lost to Sexton, which was a poor result, so he had to move down. Skelton has not lost to the likes of Sexton.

No, but he did get knocked out by Rogan.

Yes, but I didn't want Sexton in the top 20, which I would have had to do to keep Rogan above Skelton.

whiteboy wrote:

Horse wrote:I believe I have posted the list a few days late twice, I will try not to do that again.

Classic

Thank you.

banjo wrote:

Finch wrote:

Horse wrote: 3. (3.) Carl Froch
4. (4.) David Haye

I think there's nothing wrong with it, and it will be proven when Haye is flattened this month.

That would help my argument.

metropol wrote:napa is too high also

Yes, he is too high. I should have dropped him further down after he lost his European title. Although I wouldn't have him too many places lower.

brian13 wrote:
JOE CALZAGHE IS RETIRED
Horse wrote:
I know, but he is still an active fighter.


Absolute quality!

brian13 wrote:

Horse wrote:Murray fell out because of inactivity. Murray will re-enter, quite possibly above Duddy, if he beats Lawton this month. I would favour Murray if he fought Rees, although I would give Rees a decent chance.

I have never heard as much bulls**t, Rees was inactive for over a year and was still in the list,

Rees was in the top 10 after winning the WBA title, so it has taken a while for him to fall towards the bottom. Murray was never very high in the list, so it didn't take him long to fall out.

brian13 wrote:Elcock has lost 4 of his fights and is in the top 30 and Murray has never been beaten and he isn't in the list.

Elcock has fought better fighters than Murray has. I don't see what being undefeated has to do with being in the list or not.

brian13 wrote:Horse- are you Fr*nk Warren or Dean Powell

I am neither allegedly or Dean Powell.

No Olusugun, even though he is fighting for the British title this month and has based himself in the UK for sometime and beaten so good names.

Yes, I am sure he will be "considered" after the Morrison fight - but why not before. He's been active.

Horse wrote:

Finch wrote:

Horse wrote: 3. (3.) Carl Froch
4. (4.) David Haye

I believe most people think that Haye should be above Froch, which is a reasonable point of view. However, I am a member of the sizable minority who thinks that Froch should be above Haye. I don't really think that is a ridiculous opinion.

Majority rules, or we could all put our top 30 lb4lb rankings up and spam the board.

You answered your own question there pedro. Think you should correct it.

TheGoods wrote:brian13 wrote:
JOE CALZAGHE IS RETIRED
Horse wrote:
I know, but he is still an active fighter.


Absolute quality!

That made me laugh so much when I first saw it that I refused to reply to it.

TheGoods wrote:brian13 wrote:
JOE CALZAGHE IS RETIRED
Horse wrote:
I know, but he is still an active fighter.


Absolute quality!

His last fight was less than 7 months ago, so in that way he is still active.

stujones wrote:No Olusugun, even though he is fighting for the British title this month and has based himself in the UK for sometime and beaten so good names.

Yes, I am sure he will be "considered" after the Morrison fight - but why not before. He's been active.

Even if I did consider Olusegun British before, his record would only suggest a lower 21-30 ranking at best. His best opponent in the last 12 months is Haywood, which is not really top 30 calibre.

If he beats Morrison then he will be a strong contender for a place in the rankings next month.

Horse wrote:

TheGoods wrote:brian13 wrote:
JOE CALZAGHE IS RETIRED
Horse wrote:
I know, but he is still an active fighter.


Absolute quality!

His last fight was less than 7 months ago, so in that way he is still active.

Not really. Active would be if he wasn't retired.

Finch wrote:

Horse wrote:I believe most people think that Haye should be above Froch, which is a reasonable point of view. However, I am a member of the sizable minority who thinks that Froch should be above Haye. I don't really think that is a ridiculous opinion.

Majority rules, or we could all put our top 30 lb4lb rankings up and spam the board.

It is too late to change it now, as I only found out that Haye was generally considered to be above Froch P4P after I made the decision.

If other people want to put up their own P4P lists then that is up to them.

Finch wrote:You answered your own question there pedro. Think you should correct it.

Who is Pedro? I stand by my decision.

Horse wrote:

Finch wrote:You answered your own question there pedro. Think you should correct it.

Who is Pedro? I stand by my decision.

You're the weirdest character ever. I'm starting to think you're not real. You respond like a robot. Pedro is just word like mate, dude, hombre, etc.

Asterix wrote:

Horse wrote:

Finch wrote:You answered your own question there pedro. Think you should correct it.

Who is Pedro? I stand by my decision.

You're the weirdest character ever. I'm starting to think you're not real. You respond like a robot. Pedro is just word like mate, dude, hombre, etc.

Holy sh1t that explains it, Horse comes out as a robot the same week that the Terminators try to erase humanity!

AAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Asterix wrote:Not really. Active would be if he wasn't retired.

I think the term "active" is open to interpretation.

Asterix wrote:You're the weirdest character ever. I'm starting to think you're not real. You respond like a robot.

I think it would be a very advanced robot that could respond in the manner that I do. I don't believe such a robot currently exists.

Asterix wrote:Pedro is just word like mate, dude, hombre, etc.

I found it disrespectful. Perhaps I am misinterpreting the intentions of Finch in using that name.

Horse wrote:

Asterix wrote:You're the weirdest character ever. I'm starting to think you're not real. You respond like a robot.

I think it would be a very advanced robot that could respond in the manner that I do. I don't believe such a robot currently exists.

You're like a cross between TML and BStrege.

Horse wrote:

Asterix wrote:Pedro is just word like mate, dude, hombre, etc.

I found it disrespectful. Perhaps I am misinterpreting the intentions of Finch in using that name.

I think you are. It did not come across as disrespectful to me.

banjo wrote:Holy sh1t that explains it, Horse comes out as a robot the same week that the Terminators try to erase humanity!

AAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why would a robot spend its time posting on boxrec?

Asterix wrote:

You're like a cross between TML and BStrege.

Is that good or bad?

Horse wrote:

banjo wrote:Holy sh1t that explains it, Horse comes out as a robot the same week that the Terminators try to erase humanity!

AAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why would a robot spend its time posting on boxrec?

Gathering information to pinpoint our weakspots and prepare for destruction

Asterix wrote:I think you are. It did not come across as disrespectful to me.

It is lucky I didn't go mental about it then.