MURRAY MITCHELL

NEXT YEAR WHERE WOULD U PUT YOUR MONEY IF IT HAPPENED

MURRAY
53
50%
MITCHELL
54
50%
 
Total votes: 107

handles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 89
Joined: 16 Jul 2009, 15:34

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by handles »

Autobarn wrote:wouldn't it have been a bit of a nightmare, with warren claiming options on prescott, potential lawsuits/trouble/aggro?

props to mitchell, he got the chance and he did it. i've never seen him move like that or look so controlled. he made a considerable leap up in class, and delivered when given the opportunity. after all that time off and the injury as well. what a night for him, and i hope he wins a world title.

anyway, murray has some good work ahead of him, the Euro route vs mezaache. let's see if he can really raise his stock, perhaps defend vs a former world champ like rees, and hopefully force some kind of big fight.
murry has been in the game a long time and deserves all the chances he can get if he takes them
MrBoxingUK2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 14:13

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by MrBoxingUK2 »

tonyevs wrote:I`d go for Murray to bust him up in a cracker.
Mitchell wouldn`t be allowed to get away from Murray like he easilly did with Prescot.

I think we all know beyond doubt that the Khan result flattered Prescott hugely.
but murray isn't a puncher. mitchell would catch him way tto easy. i think your dwelling on only kev's fight with prscott he can do exactly what murray does but with more power and a better chin
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by Autobarn »

prescott is "just" a very strong, heavy handed guy with no real skills. mitchell did great to beat him, and will get better.

personally, i always fancied murray to beat mitchell - in a cracker. murray is very controlled and he does parry and block. his shots are very accurate and his pressure purposeful. mitchell appears considerably faster. but good pressure can deal with this. murray showed some extra dimensions in his last fight, looking lean and stylish. both are clearly underrated as boxers, and there would be some brutal back-and-forth exchanges.

i always saw mitchell as a lightweight, always prefered murray-mitchell to murray-khan as a hardcore fight fan. hopefully murray can have a big 2010.
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

great fight.

mitchell-katsidis looks on though don't it. :)

can't wait for that. :OhYes:
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by n1ebf »

WOW!!!! what a poll.......46 votes to 44!!

i went Mitchell.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by leforge »

I can't see this happening unless both have a world title.
Des1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 872
Joined: 07 Dec 2006, 10:11

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by Des1 »

hitman_hatton1 wrote:great fight.

mitchell-katsidis looks on though don't it. :)

can't wait for that. :OhYes:
And I go for Mitchell in that fight aswell after Saturday's showing. Katsidis got dropped by Graham Earl dont forget and Mitchell I'd say is a more hurtfull, quicker and harder puncher than Earl
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by n1ebf »

I would have to say that Katsidis would be too powerful and damn right tough for Mitchell. It would be a brutal affair. Although if Mitchell turned the clock back like he did Saturday who knows.

Fan of Kevin Mitchell, balls of steel and comes across well.

As for Katsidis, not seen a massive amount of him but his fight with Casamayor was thrilling. That's one of the best finishes I've ever seen and if anybody wants to read an interesting account of Casamayor then I would recommend "In The Red Corner" - A Journey into Cuban Boxing by John Duncan.

The Casamayor chapter is bloody fantastic.
Eraserhead
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 554
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 18:46

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by Eraserhead »

Mitchell can do more things and change if he needs to. I don't think Murray can.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by Autobarn »

glad that katsidis has been brought up. it now seems that katsidis - whom murray wanted - is on mitchell's radar.

katsidis wants marquez but i doubt marquez makes 135 again.

one thing about mitchell. to reiterate, wonderful movement. but i reckon he had to take a lot off his shots. only a couple of times did he really turn over his hooks. great shots they were. all i'm saying is when he's moving, sometimes he throws off balance. and i think he got a bit too much credit - at least over the first half - for hitting prescott's gloves, and controlling the range without landing clean punches...mitchell was outstanding over the 2nd half though, in which i gave him 5 of the last 6 (on top of his 3 of the first 6).
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by Counter-puncher »

Eraserhead wrote:Mitchell can do more things and change if he needs to. I don't think Murray can.
good point

barn- any reason you don't think JMM can make 135? his in ring weight is only 6-7lbs above that i think?
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by Autobarn »

Counter-puncher wrote:
Eraserhead wrote:Mitchell can do more things and change if he needs to. I don't think Murray can.
good point

barn- any reason you don't think JMM can make 135? his in ring weight is only 6-7lbs above that i think?
i just think he will cash out up in weight, vs ricky hatton.

i don't think JMM will hang around for the likes of katisdis, mitchell or murray, not when he can make lots more money vs a faded big name.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by Autobarn »

one thing i really appreciate about mitchell's win. the improvement with jimmy tibbs. he did it without the expensive american trainer, and put on world class boxing, especially over the 2nd half. clearly roach has done wonders for khan, but it's not like everyone needs a trainer from the states in order to succeed.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23027
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by mickey1975 »

Autobarn wrote:one thing i really appreciate about mitchell's win. the improvement with jimmy tibbs. he did it without the expensive american trainer, and put on world class boxing, especially over the 2nd half. clearly roach has done wonders for khan, but it's not like everyone needs a trainer from the states in order to succeed.
Tibbs is one of the best trainers in the world
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by sweetscience »

has there every been a poll this close after 100 votes ?
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by 15829 »

when i voted i accidently voted for murray :KO:
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: MURRAY MITCHELL

Post by n1ebf »

diggler wrote:when i voted i accidently voted for murray :KO:
Youuu Plonker!!
Post Reply