Re: How many British boxers
Posted: 10 Jan 2010, 16:07
jimglen wrote:I believe that's 5.
jimglen wrote:I believe that's 5.
jimglen wrote:well a look at the "Fabulous Floyd", a LW cum WW, in the past he would have been fighting as a WW cum MW - for starters!
Anyhow lets just look at the great little LW cum WW Eric Boon, whom in 1948 when at the end of his career goes a beauty against French great Robert Villimain and this is Fight of the year!
Villimain a couple of years later scares the _uck out of our all-time great MW's and is defo one of the greats at the weight!!
Boon was well past it and among some of the lads that gave him hell was his rival Arthur Danahar, now two great little fighters, Still not Britain's best at the weight and the next 3 kick Money's little ass!!!
Ted kid Lewis
Jackie kid Berg
Ernie Roderick
History IS A LONG time and the great fighters of the Greatest periods are by far the more superior bunch...
too many greats over the years to be discounted by Modern Hype and Media _ullshit and especially from one of the weakest periods in the sports long history!
Yep, That's Jimbo's M.O. too.tonyevs wrote:jimglen wrote:I believe that's 5.
yep. my wife does the same when she can`t prove her point ...talk nonsense, and change the subject ...
very sorry jimglen:oops:jimglen wrote:Subject wasn't changed that's 5 British fighters AT THE WEIGHT who beat Floyd...
Ted Kid Lewisjimglen wrote:well a look at the "Fabulous Floyd", a LW cum WW, in the past he would have been fighting as a WW cum MW - for starters!
Anyhow lets just look at the great little LW cum WW Eric Boon, whom in 1948 when at the end of his career goes a beauty against French great Robert Villimain and this is Fight of the year!
Villimain a couple of years later scares the _uck out of our all-time great MW's and is defo one of the greats at the weight!!
Boon was well past it and among some of the lads that gave him hell was his rival Arthur Danahar, now two great little fighters, Still not Britain's best at the weight and the next 3 kick Money's little ass!!!
Ted kid Lewis
Jackie kid Berg
Ernie Roderick
History IS A LONG time and the great fighters of the Greatest periods are by far the more superior bunch...
too many greats over the years to be discounted by Modern Hype and Media _ullshit and especially from one of the weakest periods in the sports long history!
Ernie Roderick would not have laid a glove on Mayweather. Him, Boon and Danahar were not really in the class as someone like Berg, who was really up with the really top class Americans. Some of those guys may have been tougher than Mayweather, but I don't see how they were nearly as skillful.jimglen wrote:well a look at the "Fabulous Floyd", a LW cum WW, in the past he would have been fighting as a WW cum MW - for starters!
Anyhow lets just look at the great little LW cum WW Eric Boon, whom in 1948 when at the end of his career goes a beauty against French great Robert Villimain and this is Fight of the year!
Villimain a couple of years later scares the _uck out of our all-time great MW's and is defo one of the greats at the weight!!
Boon was well past it and among some of the lads that gave him hell was his rival Arthur Danahar, now two great little fighters, Still not Britain's best at the weight and the next 3 kick Money's little ass!!!
Ted kid Lewis
Jackie kid Berg
Ernie Roderick
History IS A LONG time and the great fighters of the Greatest periods are by far the more superior bunch...
too many greats over the years to be discounted by Modern Hype and Media _ullshit and especially from one of the weakest periods in the sports long history!
But McAvoy was beaten by Marcel Thil as well as twice by Len Harvey. And Thil was a middleweight, though no one would have him in any top 20 of all time.jimglen wrote:Jock McAvoy, mid-late 30s was the most feared MW in the world.
denied a shot at the world's MW title, had one at L-HW against no less a fighter than J H Lewis and was the ONLY fighter ranked in the world's top 10 by the Ring at both MW and L-HW, 1938.
they never used that term then but McAvoy was in fact that at his weight, MW.
These sort of things mean nothing to Jimbo as he doesn't take actual results into account.gobbles wrote:But McAvoy was beaten by Marcel Thil as well as twice by Len Harvey. And Thil was a middleweight, though no one would have him in any top 20 of all time.jimglen wrote:Jock McAvoy, mid-late 30s was the most feared MW in the world.
denied a shot at the world's MW title, had one at L-HW against no less a fighter than J H Lewis and was the ONLY fighter ranked in the world's top 10 by the Ring at both MW and L-HW, 1938.
they never used that term then but McAvoy was in fact that at his weight, MW.