How many British boxers
-
Smally Big Plums
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 164
- Joined: 12 Aug 2007, 14:57
How many British boxers
How many British boxers can rightly have said to have held the title of No1 p4p in the world?
I imagine Calzaghe last held the title (as it were) when he beat BHOP.
I'm just wondering how many other British boxers have been regarded as p4p No.1 at some stage.
I imagine Calzaghe last held the title (as it were) when he beat BHOP.
I'm just wondering how many other British boxers have been regarded as p4p No.1 at some stage.
Re: How many British boxers
Lennox Lewis was probably close enough but whether he was at the top I don't know. Naz was probably there or there abouts too.
-
alexpaterson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4310
- Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22
Re: How many British boxers
When Ken Buchanan went over to Puerto Rico to defeat Ismael Laguna he must of been up there.
Re: How many British boxers
Lewis for sure was no 1, cannot say any others. Naz was amazing though around the time of the Vazquez win
-
Chris W 1982
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1139
- Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32
Re: How many British boxers
None in my eyes.
Re: How many British boxers
x 2.The quiet man 2004 wrote:None in my eyes.
-
yiddo14
- Heavyweight

Re: How many British boxers
None, unless we go back to Jimmy Wilde.
The names above have been top 5, maybe top 3 but none have been undisputed number 1 in my eyes.
The names above have been top 5, maybe top 3 but none have been undisputed number 1 in my eyes.
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6150
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
Re: How many British boxers
bob fitzsimmons. 
Re: How many British boxers
Calzaghe was never pound for pound king. Even after beating Hopkins, the vast majority of people still had Pacquiao as number one, and in my opinion Calzaghe didn't have a strong argument to challenge that position.Smally Big Plums wrote:How many British boxers can rightly have said to have held the title of No1 p4p in the world?
I imagine Calzaghe last held the title (as it were) when he beat BHOP.
I'm just wondering how many other British boxers have been regarded as p4p No.1 at some stage.
-
damianhucker1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3071
- Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36
Re: How many British boxers
id disagree , i dont think the majority would have said pacman till more recently , i think mayweather would have been most peoples choice at the end of calzaghes time .crusader wrote:Calzaghe was never pound for pound king. Even after beating Hopkins, the vast majority of people still had Pacquiao as number one, and in my opinion Calzaghe didn't have a strong argument to challenge that position.Smally Big Plums wrote:How many British boxers can rightly have said to have held the title of No1 p4p in the world?
I imagine Calzaghe last held the title (as it were) when he beat BHOP.
I'm just wondering how many other British boxers have been regarded as p4p No.1 at some stage.
Re: How many British boxers
None IMO, then again P4P rankings are entirely debatable.
Re: How many British boxers
Wasn't Mayweather in retirement though? At the end of 2008 the top 5[according to Liverpuncher.com-similiar to the ring] were:damianhucker1 wrote:id disagree , i dont think the majority would have said pacman till more recently , i think mayweather would have been most peoples choice at the end of calzaghes time .crusader wrote:Calzaghe was never pound for pound king. Even after beating Hopkins, the vast majority of people still had Pacquiao as number one, and in my opinion Calzaghe didn't have a strong argument to challenge that position.Smally Big Plums wrote:How many British boxers can rightly have said to have held the title of No1 p4p in the world?
I imagine Calzaghe last held the title (as it were) when he beat BHOP.
I'm just wondering how many other British boxers have been regarded as p4p No.1 at some stage.
1. Pacquaio
2. Calzaghe
3. JM Marquez
4. Vazquez
5. Margarito
If Calzaghe wasn't No.1 at this stage he never was.
Re: How many British boxers
When Calzaghe peaked in most peoples pound for pound rankings Mayweather was in retirement and Pacquiao was the overwhelming pick for #1 pound for pound. #2 usually varied on the majority of lists between JMM or Calzaghedamianhucker1 wrote:id disagree , i dont think the majority would have said pacman till more recently , i think mayweather would have been most peoples choice at the end of calzaghes time .crusader wrote:Calzaghe was never pound for pound king. Even after beating Hopkins, the vast majority of people still had Pacquiao as number one, and in my opinion Calzaghe didn't have a strong argument to challenge that position.Smally Big Plums wrote:How many British boxers can rightly have said to have held the title of No1 p4p in the world?
I imagine Calzaghe last held the title (as it were) when he beat BHOP.
I'm just wondering how many other British boxers have been regarded as p4p No.1 at some stage.
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: How many British boxers
Jock McAvoy, mid-late 30s was the most feared MW in the world.
denied a shot at the world's MW title, had one at L-HW against no less a fighter than J H Lewis and was the ONLY fighter ranked in the world's top 10 by the Ring at both MW and L-HW, 1938.
they never used that term then but McAvoy was in fact that at his weight, MW.
denied a shot at the world's MW title, had one at L-HW against no less a fighter than J H Lewis and was the ONLY fighter ranked in the world's top 10 by the Ring at both MW and L-HW, 1938.
they never used that term then but McAvoy was in fact that at his weight, MW.
-
Mick the Mechanic
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 109
- Joined: 21 Jun 2008, 13:02
Re: How many British boxers
What about Honeyghan after Curry?
Re: How many British boxers
This was at the time Chavez and Hagler were around to name a few so I would say they both would have definitely been ahead of Honeyghan at this time and I would say a few others were too.Mick the Mechanic wrote:What about Honeyghan after Curry?
Re: How many British boxers
stujones wrote:x 2.The quiet man 2004 wrote:None in my eyes.
X3
to say Lennox was P4P
Naz cannot really have been regarded as the best at his weight. Go through his record, and you`ll see lots of old fighters with past good reps. The 1st real test he had .. he lost. Some will argue that of course
I`ve said it before .. so will say it again. Britain has never produced a fighter/boxer on par with a Roy Jones jr./ODLH, JC Chavez, Azum Nelson, Mayweather, Pacman, BHop etc :(
Re: How many British boxers
you must obviously be talking about greatness by achievement - which is far from greatest in competition, one vs the other...tonyevs wrote:I`ve said it before .. so will say it again. Britain has never produced a fighter/boxer on par with a Roy Jones jr./ODLH, JC Chavez, Azum Nelson, Mayweather, Pacman, BHop etc
in the course of boxing history (british), by their individual weight classes, ALL of these fighters could have been beaten by plenty of british fighters!
Re: How many British boxers
No, Curry was overhyped by the yanks, he was a very good fighter but he was never the "New Sugar Ray" like they claimed and he was certainly not the best fighter in the world P4P at a time when Hagler, Hearns and Chavez were around.Mick the Mechanic wrote:What about Honeyghan after Curry?
Re: How many British boxers
jimglen wrote:
in the course of boxing history (british), by their individual weight classes, ALL of these fighters could have been beaten by plenty of british fighters!
Care to name me a British guy at the weight who could have beaten any of the names I listed? I can think of none
Re: How many British boxers
well a look at the "Fabulous Floyd", a LW cum WW, in the past he would have been fighting as a WW cum MW - for starters!
Anyhow lets just look at the great little LW cum WW Eric Boon, whom in 1948 when at the end of his career goes a beauty against French great Robert Villimain and this is Fight of the year!
Villimain a couple of years later scares the _uck out of our all-time great MW's and is defo one of the greats at the weight!!
Boon was well past it and among some of the lads that gave him hell was his rival Arthur Danahar, now two great little fighters, Still not Britain's best at the weight and the next 3 kick Money's little ass!!!
Ted kid Lewis
Jackie kid Berg
Ernie Roderick
History IS A LONG time and the great fighters of the Greatest periods are by far the more superior bunch...
too many greats over the years to be discounted by Modern Hype and Media _ullshit and especially from one of the weakest periods in the sports long history!
Anyhow lets just look at the great little LW cum WW Eric Boon, whom in 1948 when at the end of his career goes a beauty against French great Robert Villimain and this is Fight of the year!
Villimain a couple of years later scares the _uck out of our all-time great MW's and is defo one of the greats at the weight!!
Boon was well past it and among some of the lads that gave him hell was his rival Arthur Danahar, now two great little fighters, Still not Britain's best at the weight and the next 3 kick Money's little ass!!!
Ted kid Lewis
Jackie kid Berg
Ernie Roderick
History IS A LONG time and the great fighters of the Greatest periods are by far the more superior bunch...
too many greats over the years to be discounted by Modern Hype and Media _ullshit and especially from one of the weakest periods in the sports long history!
Re: How many British boxers
jimglen wrote:well a look at the "Fabulous Floyd", a LW cum WW, in the past he would have been fighting as a WW cum MW - for starters!
Anyhow lets just look at the great little LW cum WW Eric Boon, whom in 1948 when at the end of his career goes a beauty against French great Robert Villimain and this is Fight of the year!
Villimain a couple of years later scares the _uck out of our all-time great MW's and is defo one of the greats at the weight!!
Boon was well past it and among some of the lads that gave him hell was his rival Arthur Danahar, now two great little fighters, Still not Britain's best at the weight and the next 3 kick Money's little ass!!!
Ted kid Lewis
Jackie kid Berg
Ernie Roderick
History IS A LONG time and the great fighters of the Greatest periods are by far the more superior bunch...
too many greats over the years to be discounted by Modern Hype and Media _ullshit and especially from one of the weakest periods in the sports long history!
You totally lost me mate - does this mean you can`t put forward a British boxer/fighter who could have beaten any of the names in my list?
Re: How many British boxers
I believe that's 5.