BoxRec

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 11:39**

ERIC GUY wrote:Makes me laugh when I ask the boxers if they want their DVDs of their fights, and they say, 'nah me mates taped it off sky'!! then they get home, and its not shown!! haha, poor sods, now they have to send off to me, maybe I am getting old and miserable!!, but most boxers want copys of their fights after, but think, ahh I will get it get free later on tv!, and they never do, gutted!!! 11 fights last night great action, lovely filming position, sky only showed 3 fights.. undercard will be up on Maloneypromotions website this week.
rant ended

Thats damn nice of you Eric, charging them money to see themselves in action - serious question Eric - are any of these boxers you film entitled to royalties or performing fees?

I think you are justified in your rant - what selfish bastards! Seeing as you make a few quid on the back of their performances and all.

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 11:40**

only if they have signed the dotted line

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 11:41**

ERIC GUY wrote:only if they have signed the dotted line

What dotted line is that then Eric?

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 11:42**

the line with dots on it..........................................

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 11:49**

ERIC GUY wrote:the line with dots on it..........................................

You are such a wit Eric..

Hey, as long as all boxers reading this forum know they are entitled to royalties from films sold featuring themselves performing then thats all good.

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 12:30**

ed robinson wrote:I didn't see the Mutley fight because it was after we went off air at midnight and I was on the way home but he won, third round k.o. I think. I watched Fewkes v Haywood and must be honest and say I think John won it, the ref gave a draw. It was a cracking bout that went on late, great sportsmanship between them, which was a feature all night. Thought Booth and Marsh plus Hammond and Conception were a credit to the sport after their fights.

Carl dominated and won on points against Al Hamidi. His jab worked well but he was a little heavy and felt his timing was off. Sounded refreshed and glad to be back, he's become a dad during the break of nearly two years. Gary Sykes won on points and is waiting for a Board meeting this week to see if Burns will vacate the British title and he'll get a shot at the vacant title.

The Smith family were all out to support Paul Edwards who stepped up a level to beat Andy Bell. Curtis Valentine looked strong but a bit crude, apparently Shane McGuigan beat him in the amateurs.

good insight cheers ed

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 12:44**

Carlos-Wigan wrote:
ERIC GUY wrote:the line with dots on it..........................................
You are such a wit Eric..

Hey, as long as all boxers reading this forum know they are entitled to royalties from films sold featuring themselves performing then thats all good.

what royalties are you talking about,

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 12:54**

Do you think we might see Oakey v Bellew for the vacant Commonwealth?

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 12:54**

ERIC GUY wrote:
Carlos-Wigan wrote:
ERIC GUY wrote:the line with dots on it..........................................
You are such a wit Eric..

Hey, as long as all boxers reading this forum know they are entitled to royalties from films sold featuring themselves performing then thats all good.
what royalties are you talking about,

The right of the performer is paramount in British law Eric. 8) You know that!

Lets take a hypothetical situation - you are at a show and a boxer (s) comes over to you before his or her bout and asks politely not to film their bout - for whatever reason - what do you say?

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 12:57**

ed robinson wrote:Do you think we might see Oakey v Bellew for the vacant Commonwealth?

That'd be a good fight for Bellew. I'd want him to fight McKenzie, McIntosh or Oakey.

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 14:04**

Isn't Oakey fighting on 19th

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 14:10**

Yep, against McIntosh.

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 14:12**

Carlos-Wigan wrote:
ERIC GUY wrote:
Carlos-Wigan wrote: You are such a wit Eric..

Hey, as long as all boxers reading this forum know they are entitled to royalties from films sold featuring themselves performing then thats all good.
what royalties are you talking about,
The right of the performer is paramount in British law Eric. 8) You know that!

Lets take a hypothetical situation - you are at a show and a boxer (s) comes over to you before his or her bout and asks politely not to film their bout - for whatever reason - what do you say?

I think you have issues with someone, dont take it out on me.

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 15:24**

jBacca wrote:
ed robinson wrote:Do you think we might see Oakey v Bellew for the vacant Commonwealth?
That'd be a good fight for Bellew. I'd want him to fight McKenzie, McIntosh or Oakey.

Im sure he'l be Fighting McKenzie on the 13th.. I still Cant believe Bellew makes Light Heavy

This will be a Big Year for him

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 16:05**

ed robinson wrote: Frank didn't say who will be next for Ovill but was adamant it wouldn't be Tony. Tony was there but I didn't get a chance to speak to him, he made a throat slit gesture after Ovill had won and obviously fancies the fight..

bit uncalled for from bellew. ovill is a top bloke and them kind of games arn't going to make a guy like mckenzie get in the ring with him.

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 16:29**

Just takin time out here to wish Billy all the best for a speedy recovery.
He fractured the eye socket last night.
Also - Fewkes was robbed never a draw.

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 16:31**

MrBoxingUK2 wrote:
ed robinson wrote: Frank didn't say who will be next for Ovill but was adamant it wouldn't be Tony. Tony was there but I didn't get a chance to speak to him, he made a throat slit gesture after Ovill had won and obviously fancies the fight..
bit uncalled for from bellew. ovill is a top bloke and them kind of games arn't going to make a guy like mckenzie get in the ring with him.

Stop whining it adds needle to fights.

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 17:22**

jBacca wrote:
MrBoxingUK2 wrote:
ed robinson wrote: Frank didn't say who will be next for Ovill but was adamant it wouldn't be Tony. Tony was there but I didn't get a chance to speak to him, he made a throat slit gesture after Ovill had won and obviously fancies the fight..
bit uncalled for from bellew. ovill is a top bloke and them kind of games arn't going to make a guy like mckenzie get in the ring with him.
Stop whining it adds needle to fights.

that slit throat thingy won't get him a fight with mckenzie tho. mckenzie will laugh that off and probs get a british title shot

if it was some1 that would react to a gesture like that then fair enough

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 17:23**

Is Mckenzie not a frank Maloney boxer???????????will he want that fight on wazza show when he could stage it?

Posted: **06 Feb 2010, 20:14**

If Bellew v Mckenzie gets made it should be a cracker.

I was at the Mckenzie fight with Bob Ajasafe last year, and Ovill looked like he was going to take his head off in the first two rounds but after that he seemed to run out of ideas a bit.
i still thought he'd done enough to win as Bob was knackered in the last rounds but Ovill does seem beatable once opponents get over the dangerous early rounds.

Posted: **07 Feb 2010, 03:11**

mr boxing uk you say on the slitting gesture that it wont get ovill in the ring???im sure he'll want to silence bellew who dont need him as he's a member of the who needs him club :!:

Posted: **07 Feb 2010, 06:11**

hurlock wrote:mr boxing uk you say on the slitting gesture that it wont get ovill in the ring???im sure he'll want to silence bellew who dont need him as he's a member of the who needs him club :!:

yes but ovill is close to getting a british title shot i think? so why would he fight somebody alot better then him for the commonwealth in what will be a losing battle i believe?

Posted: **07 Feb 2010, 06:44**

i really dont think ovil has that mentality, the guy has vastly improved & has damaged some big name fighters of recent where his confidence must be sky high.you think he'll be worried about some untested rookie???
i feel bellew is ready & it should answer alot of questions of bellew.mckenzie is in his prime.

Posted: **07 Feb 2010, 06:46**

ERIC GUY wrote:
Carlos-Wigan wrote:
ERIC GUY wrote: what royalties are you talking about,
The right of the performer is paramount in British law Eric. 8) You know that!

Lets take a hypothetical situation - you are at a show and a boxer (s) comes over to you before his or her bout and asks politely not to film their bout - for whatever reason - what do you say?
I think you have issues with someone, dont take it out on me.

All you have to do when some 6 x 3s kid asks you for a film is give them a damn film! You are making money off the back of them and have been doing it for years - its the least you can do!

Posted: **07 Feb 2010, 06:51**

i think there's a chance eric gets nothing if it aint used,but to not supply the fighter with a dvd is a joke as eric should recieve payment for filming regardless. maybe people might wise up to copy wrights & may not want to be filmed.

BoxRec

Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie

Re: Bellew Vs McKenzie