Page 2 of 3
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 10 Feb 2010, 14:02
by Stiff_jab
Loynesy wrote:Stiff_jab wrote:Area, English OR British. This will be the year that the boys step up a level and start moving towards British, Commonwealth and European. It's exciting times.
Ive seen all 3 fight a couple of times in the flesh - the best benchmark, and seen all of their fights on tape. If you believe all 3 of them will be at that level by end of the year, you are deluded, I'd have a hefty wager with you that none of them will be.
At what level by the end of the year? By the end of this year they will all be fighting for area, english or british titles. After having watched all of their fights I have no doubt that they will progress quickly to euro and commonwealth (within the next 2 years) given the opportunity.
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 10 Feb 2010, 14:35
by el_grande_mauro_mina
Stiff_jab wrote:Carlos-Wigan wrote:Stiff_jab wrote:
Michael has walked through all of his opponents thus far. He is quick, strong and hasn't yet been troubled. As I said before i've no doubt that Ali has skill but I feel he may be punching slightly above his weight so early in his pro career.
This and Ryans fight do however look to be great fights to gauge the progress of the lads.

Thats because every single one of the fighters he has faced has not only been one division below him but sometimes two or three! Walsh has fought as heavy as 9 stone - he is going to walk through them - Ali is a flyweight and I hope the Iraqi belts him around the ring come saturday - he probably won't - but one day Walsh will be facing someone his size and he won't be walking through them! Can't wait to see it and I am not on my own!

What? Michael fights ideally at bantamweight, in 6 fights he has fought people from super fly (1 weight below him) to super feather (3 weights above him). He has K.O'd all of them without going past the 4th round. Ali is flyweight and is going to get a lesson in pro boxing.
As I said before I know you don't like them and they don't care. Half of you havn't seen them fight. I would love someone to tell me when either Liam or Ryan have showboated??? It hasn't happened.
Come the end of this year the Walshes will all hold titles. FACT
He has fought at bantamweight once and has fought up to featherweight and the lad he is fighting tomorrow is a natural flyweight - there is no real reason why Big Boy can't get bantamweights for him to fight if Michael Walshes natural weight is banamweight - Michael Walsh is a super bantam cum feather if the weights this early on in his career are anything to go by - if he does fight for a belt - it won't be at bantamweight.
The Walsh brothers do hold a title already as it happens: The most annoying family in British boxing!

Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 10 Feb 2010, 15:07
by damianhucker1
i reckon theyll get in some sort of trouble outside the ring before they get anywhere near title shots , theyll just fade away inside the next 18 months . if im wrong so what , theyll not be winning the british anytime soon , can you really see any of them beating the likes of jason "2 smooth" booth . booths too clever for them and would expose defensive faults.
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 10 Feb 2010, 15:54
by slapbangwhallop
Deno1986 wrote:
Fancy a Hyland clean sweep?
Without doubt.
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 11 Feb 2010, 00:05
by jBacca
I can't stand them and can't wait for them to get sparked out.
Stiff_jab, tell Michael to go up to FW and then hopefully we might get to see Swifty knock him out.
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 11 Feb 2010, 04:54
by teddy007
"He has fought at bantamweight once and has fought up to featherweight and the lad he is fighting tomorrow is a natural flyweight - there is no real reason why Big Boy can't get bantamweights for him to fight if Michael Walshes natural weight is banamweight - Michael Walsh is a super bantam cum feather if the weights this early on in his career are anything to go by - if he does fight for a belt - it won't be at bantamweight. The Walsh brothers do hold a title already as it happens: The most annoying family in British boxing"
Carlos I will have to dissagree with you there, they are second to the Fury family. Tyson = Average HW His brother = Thick as f*ck and one of the worst haircutts i have ever seen, his dad = Without doubt the biggest pr!ck in British Boxing and a so called hardman.
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 11 Feb 2010, 05:35
by el_grande_mauro_mina
teddy007 wrote:"He has fought at bantamweight once and has fought up to featherweight and the lad he is fighting tomorrow is a natural flyweight - there is no real reason why Big Boy can't get bantamweights for him to fight if Michael Walshes natural weight is banamweight - Michael Walsh is a super bantam cum feather if the weights this early on in his career are anything to go by - if he does fight for a belt - it won't be at bantamweight. The Walsh brothers do hold a title already as it happens: The most annoying family in British boxing"
Carlos I will have to dissagree with you there, they are second to the Fury family. Tyson = Average HW His brother = Thick as f*ck and one of the worst haircutts i have ever seen, his dad = Without doubt the biggest pr!ck in British Boxing and a so called hardman.
You can bet your life the Walsh and the Fury families are well accquainted! I think the Walsh brothers were born around Rochdale way...
Gypsy Johnny wasn't a bad fighter though, Teddy - back in the day...

Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 11 Feb 2010, 06:07
by stevieb_8006
Carlos-Wigan wrote:teddy007 wrote:"He has fought at bantamweight once and has fought up to featherweight and the lad he is fighting tomorrow is a natural flyweight - there is no real reason why Big Boy can't get bantamweights for him to fight if Michael Walshes natural weight is banamweight - Michael Walsh is a super bantam cum feather if the weights this early on in his career are anything to go by - if he does fight for a belt - it won't be at bantamweight. The Walsh brothers do hold a title already as it happens: The most annoying family in British boxing"
Carlos I will have to dissagree with you there, they are second to the Fury family. Tyson = Average HW His brother = Thick as f*ck and one of the worst haircutts i have ever seen, his dad = Without doubt the biggest pr!ck in British Boxing and a so called hardman.
Its his cousin with the shit hair isnt it? Not brother!
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 11 Feb 2010, 09:12
by whicker
jBacca wrote:
hopefully we might get to see Swifty knock him out.
Never going to happen.
(The fight, I mean.)
I'm sure Swifty would take him out in a couple of rounds if they did fight.
Which is why they never will!
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 11 Feb 2010, 09:13
by whicker
stevieb_8006 wrote:
Its his cousin with the poop hair isnt it? Not brother!
Three Brothers, two of whom are twins (i think.)
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 11 Feb 2010, 09:16
by mickey1975
whicker wrote:stevieb_8006 wrote:
Its his cousin with the poop hair isnt it? Not brother!
Three Brothers, two of whom are twins (i think.)
He is on about Tyson Fury's brother/cousin
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 11 Feb 2010, 09:16
by whicker
sorry, my mistake.
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 11 Feb 2010, 09:22
by jBacca
whicker wrote:jBacca wrote:
hopefully we might get to see Swifty knock him out.
Never going to happen.
(The fight, I mean.)
I'm sure Swifty would take him out in a couple of rounds if they did fight.
Which is why they never will!
I know, but one can wish

Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 12 Feb 2010, 05:47
by bigsteve
bunch of idiots
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 12 Feb 2010, 05:49
by alexpaterson
bigsteve wrote:bunch of idiots
Classy response
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
D
Agreed though
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 12 Feb 2010, 05:51
by bigsteve
alexpaterson wrote:bigsteve wrote:bunch of idiots
Classy response
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
D
Agreed though
I hope all 3 get stepped up in class, if they are that good and prove themselves then good luck but hopefully they'll get KTFO

Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 12 Feb 2010, 05:54
by alexpaterson
bigsteve wrote:alexpaterson wrote:bigsteve wrote:bunch of idiots
Classy response
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
D
Agreed though
I hope all 3 get stepped up in class, if they are that good and prove themselves then good luck but hopefully they'll get KTFO

I dont like seeing people showing up journeyman and making them look stupid by showboating without these journeyman boxing wouldnt be as good, boxing needs journeymen and people who mock them like the Walsh's annoy me. Its alright if your beating a respected name but if it's a guy your bound to beat why do you need to showboat?
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 12 Feb 2010, 05:56
by bigsteve
alexpaterson wrote:bigsteve wrote:alexpaterson wrote:
Classy response
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
D
Agreed though
I hope all 3 get stepped up in class, if they are that good and prove themselves then good luck but hopefully they'll get KTFO

I dont like seeing people showing up journeyman and making them look stupid by showboating without these journeyman boxing wouldnt be as good, boxing needs journeymen and people who mock them like the Walsh's annoy me. Its alright if your beating a respected name but if it's a guy your bound to beat why do you need to showboat?
you are 100% right on that, so I think the answer we a re looking for is
THEY ARE COCKS
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 12 Feb 2010, 05:58
by alexpaterson
bigsteve wrote:alexpaterson wrote:bigsteve wrote:
I hope all 3 get stepped up in class, if they are that good and prove themselves then good luck but hopefully they'll get KTFO

I dont like seeing people showing up journeyman and making them look stupid by showboating without these journeyman boxing wouldnt be as good, boxing needs journeymen and people who mock them like the Walsh's annoy me. Its alright if your beating a respected name but if it's a guy your bound to beat why do you need to showboat?
you are 100% right on that, so I think the answer we a re looking for is
THEY ARE COCKS
Thats the one

Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 12 Feb 2010, 06:09
by rhino222
Wales wrote:Shame they're three of the most disliked boxers in British boxing already.
due to their neanderthal fans !!
the best thing out of cromer is the number 27 bus to kings lynn. the walsh brothers stink, crabs stink, the sea stinks...etc etc
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 12 Feb 2010, 06:19
by bigsteve
rhino222 wrote:Wales wrote:Shame they're three of the most disliked boxers in British boxing already.
due to their neanderthal fans !!
the best thing out of cromer is the number 27 bus to kings lynn. the walsh brothers stink, crabs stink, the sea stinks...etc etc
So you wouldnt recomment Cromer for a holiday
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 12 Feb 2010, 08:29
by adamburke83
There is no way them boys will get titles.....
Look who holds them belts
SuperFeather/Lightweight: - (Michael Walsh):
British SFW - Kevin Mitchell
British LW - John Murray
English LW - Martin Gethin
Commonwealth LW - Lee McAllister
Commonwealth SFW - Ricky Burns
FeatherWeight: - (Ryan Walsh):
British - Martin Lindsay
Commenwealth - John Simpson
SuperBantamWeight/BantamWeight: - (Liam Walsh):
British SBW - Jason Booth
Commonwealth SBW - Jason Booth
British BW - Jamie McDonnell
English BW - Jamie McDonnell
There is noway any of the Walshes stand a chance against the champions as it stands.....
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 12 Feb 2010, 09:12
by whicker
alexpaterson wrote:I dont like seeing people showing up journeyman and making them look stupid by showboating without these journeyman boxing wouldnt be as good, boxing needs journeymen and people who mock them like the Walsh's annoy me. Its alright if your beating a respected name but if it's a guy your bound to beat why do you need to showboat?
Exactly.
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 12 Feb 2010, 10:44
by n1ebf
whicker wrote:alexpaterson wrote:I dont like seeing people showing up journeyman and making them look stupid by showboating without these journeyman boxing wouldnt be as good, boxing needs journeymen and people who mock them like the Walsh's annoy me. Its alright if your beating a respected name but if it's a guy your bound to beat why do you need to showboat?
Exactly.
Precisely.
Re: The Walsh Brothers
Posted: 12 Feb 2010, 11:03
by el_grande_mauro_mina
alexpaterson wrote:bigsteve wrote:alexpaterson wrote:
Classy response
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
D
Agreed though
I hope all 3 get stepped up in class, if they are that good and prove themselves then good luck but hopefully they'll get KTFO

I dont like seeing people showing up journeyman and making them look stupid by showboating without these journeyman boxing wouldnt be as good, boxing needs journeymen and people who mock them like the Walsh's annoy me. Its alright if your beating a respected name but if it's a guy your bound to beat why do you need to showboat?
Good post - you know - when you see the condition Howard Clarke is in today - there are a lot of guys out there who exist in boxing just to fatten the records of the likes of the toeraggish Walsh brothers. They deserve respect - especially when the guy concerned doing the showboating is no Sugar Ray Leonard. (Or Ian Napa come to think of it)
As for the Cromer boys - tell them to leave their combine harvesters at home!
