BoxRec

Posted: **30 Jun 2010, 13:45**

Goodnight, Irene wrote:
Idisagree wrote:For some reason I can’t list just three. Here are some of my favorites in no particula order
Chacon vs Limon IV – All I can say is Wow!!!
Hagler vs Hearns
Prior vs Arguello I andn II
Escalera vs Arguello I and II
Gatti vs Ward I and II
Barrera vs Morales I and II
Castillo vs Corrales I
Gomez vs Pintor
Foreman vs Lyle
Vazquez vs Marquez I, II, and III
Pacquiao vs Morales I
Trinidad vs Vargas
Trinidad vs Mayorga
And the list could go on and on…
A bit cheap, mate. Everyone else made a genuine effort to limit themselves to three --- it's not as though you're the only one who had a tough time deciding.

This is very difficult but I'll pick three:
Hagler vs Hearns
Chacon vs Limon IV
Gomez vs Pintor

Are you happy now?

Posted: **30 Jun 2010, 16:17**

Lyle vs Foreman...this fight was scary. It was like watching two grizzlies or horses fighting to the death.

Ayala vs Lopez

Hagler vs Hearns

Posted: **30 Jun 2010, 18:52**

actjac wrote:Lyle vs Foreman...this fight was scary. It was like watching two grizzlies or horses fighting to the death.

Ayala vs Lopez

Hagler vs Hearns

Horses an fight to the death? That's one weird fight

Posted: **30 Jun 2010, 18:53**

Idisagree wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
Idisagree wrote:For some reason I can’t list just three. Here are some of my favorites in no particula order
Chacon vs Limon IV – All I can say is Wow!!!
Hagler vs Hearns
Prior vs Arguello I andn II
Escalera vs Arguello I and II
Gatti vs Ward I and II
Barrera vs Morales I and II
Castillo vs Corrales I
Gomez vs Pintor
Foreman vs Lyle
Vazquez vs Marquez I, II, and III
Pacquiao vs Morales I
Trinidad vs Vargas
Trinidad vs Mayorga
And the list could go on and on…
A bit cheap, mate. Everyone else made a genuine effort to limit themselves to three --- it's not as though you're the only one who had a tough time deciding.
This is very difficult but I'll pick three:
Hagler vs Hearns
Chacon vs Limon IV
Gomez vs Pintor

Are you happy now?

What are you getting so defensive about? When everyone else makes a concerted effort to restrict themselves to three --- a difficult thing, as you're doubtless aware --- & you swoop in & name a dozen fights or two, what's the point of that?

Posted: **30 Jun 2010, 19:41**

Goodnight, Irene wrote: What are you getting so defensive about? When everyone else makes a concerted effort to restrict themselves to three --- a difficult thing, as you're doubtless aware --- & you swoop in & name a dozen fights or two, what's the point of that?

Because I'm not everyone else, and I don't like to restrict myself to only 3 fights. What is the problem with listing more than three?

what's the point of that?

The point of that is that there are too many choices depending on your liking to be restricted to only few.

Posted: **30 Jun 2010, 20:32**

He asked for three fights specifically --- that's what's so wrong with listing more than three.

If he wanted to see your ten or twenty best fights, he'd have asked for that. The purpose on his part was to challenge people by listing the absolute best of the best in peoples' minds. Wasn't that kind of obvious?

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 02:00**

if you've read the responses from irene in this thread, you'll understand why he has no friends. it seems like he has to bitch about every other post. my three at this moment are:

gatti-rodriguez (gatti had 6 different fights that could make this list)
castillo-corrales 1
moore-durelle 1

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 02:05**

bjermaine wrote:if you've read the responses from irene in this thread, you'll understand why he has no friends. it seems like he has to bitch about every other post. my three at this moment are:

gatti-rodriguez (gatti had 6 different fights that could make this list)
castillo-corrales 1
moore-durelle 1

Jesus Christ, you're getting as predictable as you are ignorant. Is every thread I open going to end with you stalking, in an effort to defame me to anyone who'll listen? LOL.

If this keeps up, I shall not be surprised to see letterboxes bombarded with anti-GI pamphlets & TV commercials picturing me photoshopped with a horn & pitchfork.

BJerm, I called you for the idiot you are (though as I recall, I was not the only one). Stop crying & get over it. It's been months & months.

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 02:34**

Goodnight, Irene wrote: Jesus Christ, you're getting as predictable as you are ignorant. Is every thread I open going to end with you stalking, in an effort to defame me to anyone who'll listen? LOL.

If this keeps up, I shall not be surprised to see letterboxes bombarded with anti-GI pamphlets & TV commercials picturing me photoshopped with a horn & pitchfork.

BJerm, I called you for the idiot you are (though as I recall, I was not the only one). Stop crying & get over it. It's been months & months.

isn't this what you do to my and other people's posts? what a hypocrite.

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 09:00**

1986 World Series
1984 Summer Olypics in LA
1995 Indy 500m
2001 Teen Choice Awards

I am a singular individual who obeys to no one, therefore I can answer whatever I please on any subject regardless of what the question is.

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 10:15**

Jaywheel wrote:1986 World Series
1984 Summer Olypics in LA
1995 Indy 500m
2001 Teen Choice Awards

I am a singular individual who obeys to no one, therefore I can answer whatever I please on any subject regardless of what the question is.

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 10:24**

Goodnight, Irene wrote:He asked for three fights specifically --- that's what's so wrong with listing more than three.

If he wanted to see your ten or twenty best fights, he'd have asked for that. The purpose on his part was to challenge people by listing the absolute best of the best in peoples' minds. Wasn't that kind of obvious?

Yes that was obvious. However, I personally don't have three fights specifically. All that I listed in one way or another in their own right in my mind could be number 1, 2, or 3. Its that too hard to understand? I don't know why are you getting offended by that.

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 10:34**

Idisagree wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:He asked for three fights specifically --- that's what's so wrong with listing more than three.

If he wanted to see your ten or twenty best fights, he'd have asked for that. The purpose on his part was to challenge people by listing the absolute best of the best in peoples' minds. Wasn't that kind of obvious?

Yes that was obvious. However, I personally don't have three fights specifically. All that I listed in one way or another in their own right in my mind could be number 1, 2, or 3. Its that too hard to understand? I don't know why are you getting offended by that.

Because answering becomes pointless. If I ask for your favorite rainbow colour, why would you answer and could I care anyless if you name all 7 of them?!? Even if in one way or another in their own right in your mind could be your favorite...

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 10:40**

Jaywheel wrote: Because answering becomes pointless. If I ask for your favorite rainbow colour, why would you answer and could I care anyless if you name all 7 of them?!? Even if in one way or another in their own right in your mind could be your favorite...

I am a singular individual who obeys to no one, therefore I can answer whatever I please on any subject regardless of what the question is.

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 11:09**

Idisagree wrote:
Jaywheel wrote: Because answering becomes pointless. If I ask for your favorite rainbow colour, why would you answer and could I care anyless if you name all 7 of them?!? Even if in one way or another in their own right in your mind could be your favorite...

I am a singular individual who obeys to no one, therefore I can answer whatever I please on any subject regardless of what the question is.

That you can.

Ward/Gatti 2 is overrated. Morales/MAB 3 was much better than 2. Tito/Mayorga & Pryor/Arguello 2 were onesided. None of them belong on a list if your intention is that the fights listed are interchangeable.

I mean do you really feel the second Morales/MAB fight compares to the first? Same with Gatti/Ward.

If somebody said Tito/mayorga was better than Foreman/Lyle you wouldn't laugh?

I understand your dilemma, I could have put down 100 or so myself. But trimming off fights that have no business makes sense.

And where in the world is Saad/Lopez & Saad/Johnson?

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 11:17**

Idisagree wrote:
Jaywheel wrote: Because answering becomes pointless. If I ask for your favorite rainbow colour, why would you answer and could I care anyless if you name all 7 of them?!? Even if in one way or another in their own right in your mind could be your favorite...

I am a singular individual who obeys to no one, therefore I can answer whatever I please on any subject regardless of what the question is.

Idisagree :P

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 12:44**

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Idisagree wrote:
Jaywheel wrote: Because answering becomes pointless. If I ask for your favorite rainbow colour, why would you answer and could I care anyless if you name all 7 of them?!? Even if in one way or another in their own right in your mind could be your favorite...

I am a singular individual who obeys to no one, therefore I can answer whatever I please on any subject regardless of what the question is.

That you can.

Ward/Gatti 2 is overrated. Morales/MAB 3 was much better than 2. Tito/Mayorga & Pryor/Arguello 2 were onesided. None of them belong on a list if your intention is that the fights listed are interchangeable.

I mean do you really feel the second Morales/MAB fight compares to the first? Same with Gatti/Ward.

If somebody said Tito/mayorga was better than Foreman/Lyle you wouldn't laugh?

I understand your dilemma, I could have put down 100 or so myself. But trimming off fights that have no business makes sense.

And where in the world is Saad/Lopez & Saad/Johnson?

I think Ward/Gatti 2 was very entertaining, maybe you’re right not as good as the first one but good enough.

I’ll give you Pryor/Arguello 2 was onesided.

Tito/Mayorga I think that is more of a personal choice because I did enjoyed that fight very much. And yes I can say with a straight face that I did enjoy that fight as much as Foreman/Lyle. Not saying it was better, but in terms of entertainment I found them to be equal. It’s completely a personal choice. I shouldn’t have included that fight because it’s more of a personal choice.

You are correct Saad/Lopez was a hell of fight, I did not see Saad/Johnson? Do you know of any website where I can download that fight?

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 14:23**

The topic is best, not what you enjoyed the most. I loved watching Tito mutilate mayorga myself.

There were two Saad/Johnson fights and they were both awesome. I didn't check the vids but here is a YouTube page you can find them on.

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_q ... nson&aq=0m

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 16:25**

Other people take the same viewpoint I have, but you won't see BJerm targeting them obsessively, or at all, in fact. Herego, stalking.

Man, a guy asks for three fights, you list three fights. Tough exercise, but it ain't a tough concept. Thank you to Jaywheel for articulating it better than I could.

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 18:08**

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Other people take the same viewpoint I have, but you won't see BJerm targeting them obsessively, or at all, in fact. Herego, stalking.

Man, a guy asks for three fights, you list three fights. Tough exercise, but it ain't a tough concept. Thank you to Jaywheel for articulating it better than I could.

quit crying. again, you write the same thing you do to me and other posters.

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 19:09**

Who do you hate more, BJerm? Me, or Joe? I mean, Joe never called you for the imbecile you were, but then, I never pummeled your hero, Roy. Tough call?

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 19:55**

irene, how long does it take you to annoy the people you talk to on omgele?

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 20:03**

bjermaine wrote:irene, how long does it take you to annoy the people you talk to on omgele?

Am I to take that as you won't answer?

Posted: **01 Jul 2010, 23:51**

BarryWashington wrote:All right, y'all take your bro-mancing to the PMs. Let's hear some more 3 fight lists.

Probably fair enough. Last I'll say.

Posted: **02 Jul 2010, 00:50**

Goodnight, Irene wrote:
BarryWashington wrote:All right, y'all take your bro-mancing to the PMs. Let's hear some more 3 fight lists.
Probably fair enough. Last I'll say.

only irene can bitch at people for not following the topic correctly and then hog the thread with posts that have nothing to do with the topic.

BoxRec

The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen

Re: The 3 best fights u ever seen