Page 2 of 2
Re: Froch Abraham not for title
Posted: 08 Sep 2010, 12:11
by Horse
stujones wrote:Especially as the WBC had promised Dirrell first dibs if anything like this happened, or post super 6.
Why did they promise him anything? The WBC are a very silly organisation.
Re: Froch Abraham not for title
Posted: 08 Sep 2010, 12:25
by forcefraser
Froch v Abraham will be a top battle. Who really cares if it`s for a belt.
Re: Froch Abraham not for title
Posted: 08 Sep 2010, 12:45
by stevek3lly
Bomber 1 wrote:MacTavish wrote:Which one Bomber?
Froch Vs Abraham everyday of the week mate, It's a dream fight really!! Very entertaining fight!! 5*
Good point Bomber. I think it is going to be one hell of a scrap and I will be looking forward to it.