Man Up Frankie
Re: Man Up Frankie
My gut instinct tells me this is about money, and nothing else. Maybe a bit of principle too.
Re: Man Up Frankie
So why is he still on the bill then?G0mez wrote:My gut instinct tells me this is about money, and nothing else. Maybe a bit of principle too.
-
iamasadlittleboy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05
Re: Man Up Frankie
I wish we'd have gotten Gavin v Chaves that was being spoken about last year.
-
Frankie Gavin
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 393
- Joined: 09 Jul 2009, 17:39
Re: Man Up Frankie
I got offered lil money to fight cook I am in good shape now an will be fighting on the 25 th then again last week March first April been guaranteed that, then 6 weeks later so 3 times in 3 months I took cook fight last year for him not to make weight I ent bothered bout him but the terms were not good so turned it down I got told about fight then got told what I was getting so said no it never made sense
Re: Man Up Frankie
good lad,you know the game and the rates of pay; none of us work under the going rate and none of us can expect a pat on the back if we do.
-
saturday_kid
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 847
- Joined: 14 May 2009, 04:05
Re: Man Up Frankie
Dont really blame Frankie for not going with Cook first fight back, he's been out a while and Cook is still a dangerous fight imo.
Would like to see him fight Cook by April though
Would like to see him fight Cook by April though
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Man Up Frankie
So who is in the opposite corner ?
-
WelshDevil
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 536
- Joined: 18 Sep 2006, 14:23
Re: Man Up Frankie
That would be a really good fight.iamasadlittleboy wrote:I wish we'd have gotten Gavin v Chaves that was being spoken about last year.
Re: Man Up Frankie
NiceFrankie Gavin wrote:I got offered lil money to fight cook I am in good shape now an will be fighting on the 25 th then again last week March first April been guaranteed that, then 6 weeks later so 3 times in 3 months I took cook fight last year for him not to make weight I ent bothered bout him but the terms were not good so turned it down I got told about fight then got told what I was getting so said no it never made sense
Get that ring rust off. Good luck
Re: Man Up Frankie
I would imagine someone who is cheap as Frankie was not willingly to fight Cook for the money they offered this opponent wont be good.twenty six wrote:So who is in the opposite corner ?
Re: Man Up Frankie
Well, whomever you fight - it will be good to see you getting yourself back on track Frankie.Frankie Gavin wrote:I got offered lil money to fight cook I am in good shape now an will be fighting on the 25 th then again last week March first April been guaranteed that, then 6 weeks later so 3 times in 3 months I took cook fight last year for him not to make weight I ent bothered bout him but the terms were not good so turned it down I got told about fight then got told what I was getting so said no it never made sense
-
ApolloCreed
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 398
- Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 13:42
Re: Man Up Frankie
Good man Curtis! Good luck with rest of your career mate, you boxed very well that night.im glad you lost your money appollo!!!
-
curtis wood
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 935
- Joined: 23 May 2010, 03:23
Re: Man Up Frankie
thanks apolla just not quite good enough, ill get him next time!! 
Re: Man Up Frankie
Frankie Gavin won't be able to shake off the doubters until he faces and comes through a couple of real live opponents. Other than Curtis Woodhouse (personally i thought Woodhouse shaded it) he hasn't really beat anyone of note yet. He hasn't got all the time in the world and if he is going to make a mark on the pro boxing scene then he will have to start producing very soon before the public and his promoter give up on him. 2012 really is the make or break year for Frankie Gavin i think. Lets hope it is the year he starts to fulfill his potential!
Re: Man Up Frankie
After all he's done you'd think Gavin would fight Cook for any amount of money. It's not as if he's going to earn anymore fighting a Latvian. Sometimes you have to question how many brain cells that lad has. I reckon you could figure it out using your toes.
Re: Man Up Frankie
Admit you've been a twat, face Cookie, look good, then demand more money. Jeez - basic economics in boxing, especially for a young pro who has been useless so far.
Re: Man Up Frankie
Gary McMillan
Errrrm looks like Frankie's career is going backwards.....
Errrrm looks like Frankie's career is going backwards.....
Re: Man Up Frankie
Mcmillans a tough guy , not great boxing skills
had my bro on deck twice in First round in fight last year but was then outboxed
had my bro on deck twice in First round in fight last year but was then outboxed
wadey wrote:Gary McMillan
Errrrm looks like Frankie's career is going backwards.....
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Man Up Frankie
Daren't say a word.
JamesH will only have a pop
JamesH will only have a pop
Re: Man Up Frankie
Told you you were like an old woman.twenty six wrote:Daren't say a word.
JamesH will only have a pop
Not the best opponent but not the worst. Better than a Latvian, no?
Think the De Gale story and frankies own post enlightens me more on this story than your tittle tattle, so fill your boots.
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Man Up Frankie
Next you'll be telling me he's getting more money to face McMillan than Cook.
Face up to it, Gavin has side stepped Cook.
Face up to it, Gavin has side stepped Cook.
Re: Man Up Frankie
twenty six wrote:Next you'll be telling me he's getting more money to face McMillan than Cook.
Face up to it, Gavin has side stepped Cook.
lol i was gonna say that? must be on less cash for this fight,
Re: Man Up Frankie
So 12 weeks notice is not enough to take on a 37 year old veteran who mainly has campaigned at 2 weights below in an 8 rounder??
Very poor showing considering your team had agreed terms with Cook and he was training hard for the fight.
Of course Gavin will be on less money for his new opponent and I bet FW is not happy either.
You would be in a good position to challenge for titles and demand more money with a good showing against Cook, now you are taking steps backwards.
There is no logic to what you are doing on any level, unless you have not been in the gym and need an easy fight or your ass has just gone because Cook is a rough handful who can bang.
Very poor showing considering your team had agreed terms with Cook and he was training hard for the fight.
Of course Gavin will be on less money for his new opponent and I bet FW is not happy either.
You would be in a good position to challenge for titles and demand more money with a good showing against Cook, now you are taking steps backwards.
There is no logic to what you are doing on any level, unless you have not been in the gym and need an easy fight or your ass has just gone because Cook is a rough handful who can bang.
-
Pugilist-specialist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1632
- Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37
Re: Man Up Frankie
Didn't want to fight Adnan Amar or Junior Witter.
The posters on here who said he'd beat Kell Brook have gone quiet.

The posters on here who said he'd beat Kell Brook have gone quiet.
Re: Man Up Frankie
No I won't, you're just being a bit silly there.twenty six wrote:Next you'll be telling me he's getting more money to face McMillan than Cook.
Face up to it, Gavin has side stepped Cook.
Nonsense aside, you know enough about boxing to know about risk/reward, it has to be feasible for a number of reasons or it just doesn't make sense (think Rhodes-Small