Page 2 of 2

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Posted: 14 May 2012, 10:48
by dondada
Lenny wrote:
dondada wrote:
steve689 wrote:Crazy to think that Witter is still about and fighting at a decent level. His style was often hard to watch even at his peak and now he his older and not as sharp on the old reflexes it's bloody difficult to stomach.
Well, allow me to retort :lol:

Weirdly, because he's not as sharp or as powerful (I'd say) any more, he realises he has to be a bit more aggressive/up tempo. In a way, he's slightly better to watch now.

I'll get me coat... 8)
But then the best thing about young Witter was the possibility of a one punch knock down, out of the blue, from a funny angle, after luring the other fighter in

Being slightly more aggressive doesn't make up for losing this. Especially when it doesn't come natural to him and causes him to look messy.
He occasionally used to lure the other fighter in by doing f**k all and then spark him out. At least now he has to do a bit more. That's all I'm saying.

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Posted: 14 May 2012, 11:34
by bigB
I think Liam Cameron would have been a better fight personally but Harry did a good job and had alot of fans at the venue

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Posted: 14 May 2012, 12:08
by danfoster
bigB wrote:I think Liam Cameron would have been a better fight personally but Harry did a good job and had alot of fans at the venue
Aye but Liam's team said no.

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Posted: 15 May 2012, 08:35
by bigB
Ahh i see, ill be at the fight with Jez on 26/06 think that will be a good tear up