Channel 5 coverage

stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Channel 5 coverage

Post by stujones »

C5 need to sort out their timings, that is 2 out of the five shows that have been cut off short if you sky+ it. Luckily I suspected Galahad and Eubank would go long so I manual recorded it. However, we slag off Premier and allegedly for continually doing this.... 5 are no better.
jimcook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 842
Joined: 28 Jun 2005, 14:05

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by jimcook »

and why didnt they show any of the lynes witter fight?
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by leforge »

jimcook wrote:and why didnt they show any of the lynes witter fight?
Apparently it was a stinker of a fight. Think Lynes will retire.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by stujones »

They showed some of it. Lynes looked slow, Witter did look in very good shape.
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by milpool »

stujones wrote:C5 need to sort out their timings, that is 2 out of the five shows that have been cut off short if you sky+ it. Luckily I suspected Galahad and Eubank would go long so I manual recorded it. However, we slag off Premier and Allegedly channel for continually doing this.... 5 are no better.
I was caught out once before with C5 so when I recorded last night I got it to run 20 minutes over. Virgin Media give you the option to do that if it is a live event.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by TheCobra »

Yeh they showed the last 3 rounds of Witter vs Lynes.... and that was more than enough! To be fair to Lynes, he has been in some decent fights when he fights more orthodox fighters. Witter on the other hand has no such excuses.
Last edited by TheCobra on 13 May 2012, 07:41, edited 1 time in total.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17110
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by keithmoonhangover »

I like that Eubank is being matched so strongly. I have no interest in seeing his batter a 5-34-2 fighter.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by dondada »

keithmoonhangover wrote:I like that Eubank is being matched so strongly. I have no interest in seeing his batter a 5-34-2 fighter.
Yes mate - significantly the instruction to match him tough is coming from Channel 5. I think it'll do him good and he's capable. He doesn't seem to give a monkey's about the other man's offence, mind.
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by smoggy7188 »

I think everyone likes the fact Eubank is getting matched hard however he is an accident waiting to happen.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17110
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by keithmoonhangover »

dondada wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:I like that Eubank is being matched so strongly. I have no interest in seeing his batter a 5-34-2 fighter.
Yes mate - significantly the instruction to match him tough is coming from Channel 5. I think it'll do him good and he's capable. He doesn't seem to give a monkey's about the other man's offence, mind.
I know :o He'll learn.

Seriously, I wish SKY would take the same stance, I'm sick of complete mis-matches like the ones on the Bellew undercard. People defend them saying they are learning fights, but I bet Eubank learned a lot more last night.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17110
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by keithmoonhangover »

smoggy7188 wrote:I think everyone likes the fact Eubank is getting matched hard however he is an accident waiting to happen.
In fairness, Fury has pretty much always been matched really strongly. It's refreshing to see Hennessy take that stance.
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by smoggy7188 »

Im not complaining but be interesting to see what happens with Five boxing if Fury loses cos like Eubank he is an accident waiting to happen aswell. I think Hennessey gets a bad rap sometimes, he isnt the worst promoter out there he just got it terribly wrong with the PR for froch which I think he has learned from which is showing with Fury.
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by funso banjo baby »

stujones wrote:C5 need to sort out their timings, that is 2 out of the five shows that have been cut off short if you sky+ it. Luckily I suspected Galahad and Eubank would go long so I manual recorded it. However, we slag off Premier and Allegedly channel for continually doing this.... 5 are no better.

maybe ditch sky ?
Camcas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 881
Joined: 12 Sep 2010, 14:18

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by Camcas »

jimcook wrote:and why didnt they show any of the lynes witter fight?
Showed final three rounds, glad i didn't have to see the rest
safeerah
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 07:35

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by safeerah »

stujones wrote:C5 need to sort out their timings, that is 2 out of the five shows that have been cut off short if you sky+ it. Luckily I suspected Galahad and Eubank would go long so I manual recorded it. However, we slag off Premier and Allegedly channel for continually doing this.... 5 are no better.
too much chat for me, not enough action
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by Adamj1987 »

They should do a 3 fight night amd in order building towards the ME
safeerah
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 07:35

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by safeerah »

Casio wrote:The one thing that annoyed me was that it was only on for about 90 mins in total but yet 20 mins into the programme we were still waiting for a fight!!

If there was a quick 5 min introduction and then the 1st fight boxers entrances it would allow them to show a lot more boxing during the course of the show.

Other than that, it was good. The very fact its on terrestrial TV is a massively plus so hard to be too negative :TU:
I thought I already covered that, you must have missed that bit.
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by Adamj1987 »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
smoggy7188 wrote:I think everyone likes the fact Eubank is getting matched hard however he is an accident waiting to happen.
In fairness, Fury has pretty much always been matched really strongly. It's refreshing to see Hennessy take that stance.
i think fury for most of his fights has been matched smart not tought with chisora and mcdermott being the exceptions to is but i agree i enjoy seeing eubank matched tough
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by steve689 »

Crazy to think that Witter is still about and fighting at a decent level. His style was often hard to watch even at his peak and now he his older and not as sharp on the old reflexes it's bloody difficult to stomach.
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by Finch »

smoggy7188 wrote:Im not complaining but be interesting to see what happens with Five boxing if Fury loses cos like Eubank he is an accident waiting to happen aswell. I think Hennessey gets a bad rap sometimes, he isnt the worst promoter out there he just got it terribly wrong with the PR for froch which I think he has learned from which is showing with Fury.
This is why Fury is being mached in low risk fights and why he threw his belts down and ran away when Price was made his mandatory.
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by Finch »

smoggy7188 wrote:Im not complaining but be interesting to see what happens with Five boxing if Fury loses cos like Eubank he is an accident waiting to happen aswell. I think Hennessey gets a bad rap sometimes, he isnt the worst promoter out there he just got it terribly wrong with the PR for froch which I think he has learned from which is showing with Fury.
This is why Fury is being mached in low risk fights and why he threw his belts down and ran away when Price was made his mandatory.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by dondada »

steve689 wrote:Crazy to think that Witter is still about and fighting at a decent level. His style was often hard to watch even at his peak and now he his older and not as sharp on the old reflexes it's bloody difficult to stomach.
Well, allow me to retort :lol:

Weirdly, because he's not as sharp or as powerful (I'd say) any more, he realises he has to be a bit more aggressive/up tempo. In a way, he's slightly better to watch now.

I'll get me coat... 8)
mfc_se15
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 03 Mar 2012, 08:34

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by mfc_se15 »

Was pretty annoying missing the end of the show due to the timings. First one I'd recorded as opposed to watching all the way through live so lesson learnt!
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by Lenny »

dondada wrote:
steve689 wrote:Crazy to think that Witter is still about and fighting at a decent level. His style was often hard to watch even at his peak and now he his older and not as sharp on the old reflexes it's bloody difficult to stomach.
Well, allow me to retort :lol:

Weirdly, because he's not as sharp or as powerful (I'd say) any more, he realises he has to be a bit more aggressive/up tempo. In a way, he's slightly better to watch now.

I'll get me coat... 8)
But then the best thing about young Witter was the possibility of a one punch knock down, out of the blue, from a funny angle, after luring the other fighter in

Being slightly more aggressive doesn't make up for losing this. Especially when it doesn't come natural to him and causes him to look messy.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Channel 5 coverage

Post by bripez »

keithmoonhangover wrote:I like that Eubank is being matched so strongly. I have no interest in seeing his batter a 5-34-2 fighter.
I agree that it was a good match for this stage of his career.

However, he wasn't in with a world beater - before Saturday his opponent had 18 fights and had only won 3 of his previous 9.
Post Reply