Page 2 of 3
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 16:53
by Final round
BIGMARK wrote:Off another forum:
Michael Duberry @Original_Dubes
Audley just beat him in 4th!! Ref stopped fight! A vicious left hook started it and 25 punch combo afterwards ended it!! #Harrison/Adams
25 punch combo!!!!!!!!Audley???pull the other one
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 16:54
by Palimpsest
And the new .....
Got to be Fury next that would be a hoot!!
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 16:59
by fozzy
Has the ref got 3 arms
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 17:02
by Final round
fozzy wrote:Has the ref got 3 arms
he has!
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 17:03
by Palimpsest
fozzy wrote:Has the ref got 3 arms
You're right never noticed that
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 17:17
by jameswilson
Palimpsest wrote:And the new .....
Got to be Fury next that would be a hoot!!
On his website he said (before the fight) he wants either Fury, Price, Banks or Seth Mitchell for a July showdown.
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 17:20
by loaded_gloves
Seth Mitchell, July, DO IT A-FORCE!!!
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 17:25
by exittored
BIGMARK wrote:Off another forum:
Michael Duberry @Original_Dubes
Audley just beat him in 4th!! Ref stopped fight! A vicious left hook started it and 25 punch combo afterwards ended it!! #Harrison/Adams
As i predicted this would end in the 4th or 5th.
Nice little warm-up fight for Audley and hopefully now either Tyson Fury or David Price next...both fights he's a live underdog as both of them have glass chins.
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 17:31
by exittored
TheCobra wrote:I honestly still can't for the life of me think why Goodwin put his hard earned into getting Ali Adams this shot. He just had no chance!
I think we all made our voices clear about Adams being rubbish and the fight being a mismatch but Steve wasn't having it.
You don't suddenly go from being a guy who was stuggling to beat euro bums to someone who could compete at the top of the domestic scene in the shape of 6 months...infact Adams is probably a journey man whose mouth convinced a few people that he was something more.
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 17:32
by exittored
jameswilson wrote:Palimpsest wrote:And the new .....
Got to be Fury next that would be a hoot!!
On his website he said (before the fight) he wants either Fury, Price, Banks or Seth Mitchell for a July showdown.
Hopefully it'll be Price next for the British title.
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 17:50
by Karl Jade
I like Don Charles as a trainer and a bloke but he doesn't half come out with some nonsense.
Apparently Adams has the best jab in the world.
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 17:55
by exittored
Karl Jade wrote:I like Don Charles as a trainer and a bloke but he doesn't half come out with some nonsense.
Apparently Adams has the best jab in the world.
Did he really say that haha well that's the last time i take anything he says seriously.
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 17:56
by Palimpsest
Karl Jade wrote:I like Don Charles as a trainer and a bloke but he doesn't half come out with some nonsense.
Apparently Adams has the best jab in the world.
Didn't do him a lot of good tonight did it?
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 18:08
by keithmoonhangover
Will Harrison get David Price next?
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 18:14
by jameswilson
keithmoonhangover wrote:Will Harrison get David Price next?
Rumours a few days back were they were trying to get Price on the Khan undercard. I'd suggest Price gets a lot more out of a fight in Las Vegas on a big undercard than he would from an Audley fight.
If Audley does fight one out of that lot then I'd say Fury would be his best chance of a win (not that I necassarily think he would win) because Fury is the easiest to hit out of all of those guys, and doesn't exactly punch like a train. Just checking boxrec, Jonathan Banks and Seth Mitchell are actually down to fight eachother on the Khan v Garcia undercard haha.
Whether or not Mr Hennessy wants to have an Audley fight is another thing, Audley isn't particularly cheap as we know.
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 18:19
by keithmoonhangover
jameswilson wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:Will Harrison get David Price next?
Rumours a few days back were they were trying to get Price on the Khan undercard. I'd suggest Price gets a lot more out of a fight in Las Vegas on a big undercard than he would from an Audley fight.
If Audley does fight one out of that lot then I'd say Fury would be his best chance of a win (not that I necassarily think he would win) because Fury is the easiest to hit out of all of those guys, and doesn't exactly punch like a train. Just checking boxrec, Jonathan Banks and Seth Mitchell are actually down to fight eachother on the Khan v Garcia undercard haha.
Whether or not Mr Hennessy wants to have an Audley fight is another thing, Audley isn't particularly cheap as we know.
Fury has one thing in spades that Audley doesn't have..... guts.
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 18:28
by The_Don1
Channel 5 should demand Fury fight Harrison next, the viewing figures would probably be their best ever since the channel started, seriously.
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 18:34
by frankgreaves
Anyone got the undercard results?? Cheers :-)
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 18:39
by exittored
The_Don1 wrote:Channel 5 should demand Fury fight Harrison next, the viewing figures would probably be their best ever since the channel started, seriously.
Agreed, they could easily get 5 million plus especially if they marketed the fight heavily...the press conference alone would be a classic!
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 18:50
by Palimpsest
Do Harrison's wins Scott Belshaw and Coleman Barrett qualify him to challenge for Fury's Irish title?
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 18:59
by jameswilson
keithmoonhangover wrote:jameswilson wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:Will Harrison get David Price next?
Rumours a few days back were they were trying to get Price on the Khan undercard. I'd suggest Price gets a lot more out of a fight in Las Vegas on a big undercard than he would from an Audley fight.
If Audley does fight one out of that lot then I'd say Fury would be his best chance of a win (not that I necassarily think he would win) because Fury is the easiest to hit out of all of those guys, and doesn't exactly punch like a train. Just checking boxrec, Jonathan Banks and Seth Mitchell are actually down to fight eachother on the Khan v Garcia undercard haha.
Whether or not Mr Hennessy wants to have an Audley fight is another thing, Audley isn't particularly cheap as we know.
Fury has one thing in spades that Audley doesn't have..... guts.
By that definition Audley would have lost most of his fights.
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 20:07
by the truth
told you , not taht its a supirise but some were saying adams hahahahaha hes shit
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 26 May 2012, 20:22
by loaded_gloves
Is there anywhere we can see the fight yet?
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 27 May 2012, 01:19
by ERIC GUY
It should be up on Goodwin s website
Re: Audley-Adams!
Posted: 27 May 2012, 02:32
by Syntax Error
jameswilson wrote:Syntax Error wrote:He is indirectly responsible for killing boxing on the BBC.
Why do you keep spouting this turd? At the time the BBC bailed, they had Hennessy shows (Froch, Eastman and Eesham Pickering) as well as David Haye and Audley. If Audley was the only one not pulling in the audiences they would have just ditched his shows and stuck with the rest. But they didn't because they wanted out of boxing full stop. Thinking about it wasn'tthis around about the time they got Match of the day back? Not only that but when Audley was on he no doubt pulled in bigger audiences than the other guys. I'd bet his fights against Hersisia, Francis and Bonin, say what you like about them, pulled in a bigger audiences than any other boxing on the BBC during that period, even more than Thompson v Haye I reckon, that was obviously shown on a delay.
If you're complaining about the money he was on for his first 10 fights, I'd love to see you turn down 1million. No doubt you'd say 'Oh no, I don't want a million, I have this real affection towards the people who pay their TV licences I just couldn't possibly accept that.'
It's only turd because you don't agree.
I could accuse you of writing spouting this turd too, but I won't.
I don't give a hoot about how much he was paid (& yes, I would have accepted the money); my gripe was with his performances & decreasingly quality in opposition which led to decreasing viewing figures.
OK, you're right, he isn't solely responsible, but he was the so-called headline act & poster boy for boxing on the BBC, hence why I keep spouting the turd (to paraphrase yourself) 'indirectly responsible for killing boxing on the BBC'.
If Harrison's 10 fight contract had panned out better, I believe boxing would still be on the BBC.
Thankfully Channel 5 have picked up the baton, but I would certainly worry if Harrison was ever featured because he has form so to speak.