No disrespect Mr Buzz. But this sounds awfully lot like the proposal that Mr Detroit made before about categorising the fighters. And no disrespect here, but the idea that you have had (in bold) is a rankings structure which I refuse to get involved with, because it's far too complicated to work out... It takes me 3/4 at a time to get all the updates every week, and I really wouldn't have the time to go any further than that.BoxBuzz wrote:(The Heavies are the ones who get the advantage, and maybe crease could recognize and "cancel" that advantage if a fighter has a shorter career, it does not discriminate terribly. And that could be a plus for those who are "swapping out". (It does NOT give an advantage, but it does NOT appear to give a great disadvanatage either...it's very neutral in terms of "how many fights". This does NOT mean it would place a fighter at the top, who had only one winning fight....but would also not put a fighter in the basement for a single loss. It would depend on WHO the wins and losses were against. It's a pretty complex algorhythm.
In my defence, I did do out a poll on this before:
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=153462
And while there wasn't that many votes that took place... The current Points system was voted in.
